US Election 2020: President Elect Biden and VP Elect Harris

The Next President and VP will be?


  • Total voters
    315
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is continued in... The Aftermath

 
Last edited:
Caught red handed spying on Trump. Tried to tear him from power twice. Fact.
Yes; the issue is caught. I’d be surprised if this wasn’t standard practice in USA politics, suspect trump is doing the same using the apparatus of the state.
 
Yes; the issue is caught. I’d be surprised if this wasn’t standard practice in USA politics, suspect trump is doing the same using the apparatus of the state.
No the issue is actually that they used intellegence agencies to spy on a political opponent and then, to try to tear down an elected president. And Biden was the VP at the time.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Oh c'mon.

You used to be one of the more balanced posters, with a dose of healthy scepticism and a sense of humour to boot. Same goes with Financialpanther. I'm not trying to be a dick to you guys here, I'm just sad to see many previously jovial posters seemingly lose their mojo now on here, be it due to the lockdown or due to a certain now-banned 3 letter acronym.
 
Oh c'mon.

You used to be one of the more balanced posters, with a dose of healthy scepticism and a sense of humour to boot. Same goes with Financialpanther. I'm not trying to be a dick to you guys here, I'm just sad to see many previously jovial posters seemingly lose their mojo now on here, be it due to the lockdown or due to a certain now-banned 3 letter acronym.
I remain jovial, balanced as well a puerile and immature.
 
Biden is the favourite but it'll only take an October surprise or miraculous end to the pandemic to make it 50-50. So-called independent and "I might not vote" voters don't remember anything that happened more than 2 weeks ago. Like last time, Trump's opponent can win the vote by millions and still lose.
 
Last edited:
Oh c'mon.

You used to be one of the more balanced posters, with a dose of healthy scepticism and a sense of humour to boot. Same goes with Financialpanther. I'm not trying to be a dick to you guys here, I'm just sad to see many previously jovial posters seemingly lose their mojo now on here, be it due to the lockdown or due to a certain now-banned 3 letter acronym.
Are you saying that the locked mail boxes are fakenews? If so then thank you if you can show this. I don’t have time to research out every photo or tweet.
 
I don’t have time to research out every photo or tweet.
Then why write emotive responses to them? I expect this tabloid unverified twitter screenshot shit from the others, so take it as a compliment that I expect better from you. I'm sure we both agree on the whole "burden of proof" concept?
 
Then why write emotive responses to them? I expect this tabloid unverified twitter screenshot sh*t from the others, so take it as a compliment that I expect better from you. I'm sure we both agree on the whole "burden of proof" concept?
‘Twas an interjection of surprise

And in the spirit of information I offer this article from 2019


Maybe they are replacing old phishable mailboxes with new ones to reduce fraud.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I remain jovial, balanced as well a puerile and immature.
I hope so m8. Being puerile and immature is the secret to happiness, but I thought that your overall tone had changed for the worse lately. I've probably just misread the situation.
 
I will spare you the assessment of the effect blokes like you are having on the world.
On a serious note, looking just at the video clip you posted by itself in isolation, do you honestly believe Trump's dismissal of the question was a bad move? How would you have responded to that question?

It was trashy clickbait, pure and simple. The Guardian thank you for the extra few cents of ad revenue you just gave them!
 
‘Twas an interjection of surprise

And in the spirit of information I offer this article from 2019


Maybe they are replacing old phishable mailboxes with new ones to reduce fraud.
Maybe Trump just doesnt trust mass mail out voting after the democrats illegally spied on him and attempted two soft coups?
 
Last edited:
On a serious note, looking just at the video clip you posted by itself in isolation, do you honestly believe Trump's dismissal of the question was a bad move? How would you have responded to that question?

It was trashy clickbait, pure and simple. The Guardian thank you for the extra few cents of ad revenue you just gave them!
No, I don't think his decision not to answer the question was a bad move. He would have only dug a deeper hole for himself by giving it any more acknowledgment than he did.

I mean, when he tries to actually answers question we get this:

 
I hope so m8. Being puerile and immature is the secret to happiness, but I thought that your overall tone had changed for the worse lately. I've probably just misread the situation.
Deep seeded cynicism is just part of the overall package. I do feel for you chaps in lockdown it must be said.
 
No, I don't think his decision not to answer the question was a bad move. He would have only dug a deeper hole for himself by giving it any more acknowledgment than he did.

I mean, when he tries to actually answers question we get this:


Treated it with the contempt it deserved. Old mate will have his press pass revoked and deservedly.
 
Maybe Trump just doesnt trust mass mail out voting after the democrats illegally spied on him and attempted two soft coups?
Illegal spying does not have a clear connection to mass mail out voting. You may need to provide some connection
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top