To quote youPeople outside the inner sanctum can argue all they like. It's irrelevant...
"Probably not, but just goes to show the club does care about people."
Also irrelevant, but my post is relevant to your quote
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
To quote youPeople outside the inner sanctum can argue all they like. It's irrelevant...
Relevant or irrelevant, who gives a shit?To quote you
"Probably not, but just goes to show the club does care about people."
Also irrelevant, but my post is relevant to your quote
So no proof thenHe was listed at the time of trade. Burden of proof is on those who think he was to be delisted
You got some?So no proof then
It seems you do.................... touche'Relevant or irrelevant, who gives a shit?
Not really, I just like conversing with you.It seems you do.................... touche'
No otherwise I wouldn't have askedYou got some?
Stalemate?No otherwise I wouldn't have asked
Surely the club must've have seen something in him, IMHO (humble) I think it's a gamble given he's cat b rookie and hasn't played a senior game after 2 years in the system.Murray was not going to be delisted. If we did not come knocking would have been kept on the cat b list for another year
We're not playing chess mate, just wanna it confirmed one way or the other if the swans wanted to keep himStalemate?
I'd be questioning the relationship there good Sir.
You get her a spanking new car
And all she does is feed you? An a pie no less?
That's all?
I think she should be at least spanking you back.... at least
Yeah I like our banter tooNot really, I just like conversing with you.
Collingwood obviously thought they did.We're not playing chess mate, just wanna it confirmed one way or the other if the swans wanted to keep him
Correct, it looks now it's check mate in favour of the swans unless this kid plays 22 senior games and has a blinder year and we're contending again.Collingwood obviously thought they did.
Sydney’s back line is pretty good, and difficult to break into.Surely the club must've have seen something in him, IMHO (humble) I think it's a gamble given he's cat b rookie and hasn't played a senior game after 2 years in the system.
I am confident that CFC knows something we don't and that's why they paid overs or so it seems to us.
So Collingwood this better f***** work, otherwise I'll gladly go up for an assault charge and punch the collective signatory's in the face
Just because some team has a good backline doesn't automatically mean anyone not getting a game in that position is good though.Sydney’s back line is pretty good, and difficult to break into.
The lad has only been playing in the back line this year, so still learning his craft.
To every time you draft a kid in it is a risk, reward situation, to me this is no different. He is what we need, and works it is cheap. If not it’s no different than a second round drafted bust
Did not say it was, but who is he going to beat out after just switching to defence in the swans if he is good thoughJust because some team has a good backline doesn't automatically mean anyone not getting a game in that position is good though.
I'm tipping he plays 17 minimum this seasonFair enough on Marley but Wells as good as he is he's no good to us if only the park for 9 or 10 games a year - need a minimum 15 if we want to contend
Good news then.The spanky spank goes without saying good sir.
Started as a forward. I still have nightmares of his kicks at goalWith Sinclair doubtful for 2018 after soft tissue and concussion injuries ruined his season and Ramsay's future even more in doubt, Murray's selection makes a lot of sense.
Geoff Walsh on NAB Draft Radio last week, suggested Darcy Moore would be tried down back during the pre-season. This would allow Reid to stay forward. Our big weakness this year was our offensive pressure; we were simply second rate once the ball hit inside 50. How to rectify the problem?
If Reid plays permanent CHF with Grundy/Cox at FF, we would still need offensive pressure.
Elliott and Faz are certainties and whilst both are capable of turning a game off their own boots, neither are defensive beasts. How about Goldsack staying forward? It has worked in the past. Now for the remaining spot. There's plenty of love for Kirby and he could well fill a spot, but how about a call from left field? Could Ben Sinclair play forward? He has the pace and the defensive pressure to be considered I reckon. Has Ben ever played forward? Bucks needs to think outside the box in 2018. Provided Sinkers in still on our list going forward, it's worth considering a new role for him.
With Sinclair doubtful for 2018 after soft tissue and concussion injuries ruined his season and Ramsay's future even more in doubt, Murray's selection makes a lot of sense.
Geoff Walsh on NAB Draft Radio last week, suggested Darcy Moore would be tried down back during the pre-season. This would allow Reid to stay forward. Our big weakness this year was our offensive pressure; we were simply second rate once the ball hit inside 50. How to rectify the problem?
If Reid plays permanent CHF with Grundy/Cox at FF, we would still need offensive pressure.
Elliott and Faz are certainties and whilst both are capable of turning a game off their own boots, neither are defensive beasts. How about Goldsack staying forward? It has worked in the past. Now for the remaining spot. There's plenty of love for Kirby and he could well fill a spot, but how about a call from left field? Could Ben Sinclair play forward? He has the pace and the defensive pressure to be considered I reckon. Has Ben ever played forward? Bucks needs to think outside the box in 2018. Provided Sinkers in still on our list going forward, it's worth considering a new role for him.