Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That might be true if Berg was the preferred chop out ruck, but I don’t remember seeing him the centre once, and if he’s not doing that role then he’s not providing anything that Gollant can’t.I’m not sure they’ll drop EH, I think they’re wedded to the structure.
Himmelberg attended 2 ruck contests for the game. Thilthorpe attended 14 and 69 for ROB. ROB had 24 CBA's, Thilly had 2 contests at the centre bounce and none for Himmelberg.That might be true if Berg was the preferred chop out ruck, but I don’t remember seeing him the centre once, and if he’s not doing that role then he’s not providing anything that Gollant can’t.
Frampton ??Out: Himmelberg / McPherson / Soligo
In: Frampton / Sholl / Pedlar.
That might be true if Berg was the preferred chop out ruck, but I don’t remember seeing him the centre once, and if he’s not doing that role then he’s not providing anything that Gollant can’t.
On the Sub, I think Pedlar needs consistent game time but I don’t like dropping debutants either, so I would wait one more week before swapping them.
I would say Cook for sub, but he needs consistent game time too. I would consider Harley for the sub.
Frampton ??
You're joking aren't you ??
Yes !I'd move Hinge back and keep Dawson as a wing forward.
Our entries are absolutely horrible, we need Dawson's disposal outside the backlines
That’s the thing that might save himI’m not sure they’ll drop EH, I think they’re wedded to the structure.
Why would we need Frampton for Cox? He's only 3cm taller than Butts who would be the obvious choice. Collingwood only played two tall forwards last weekWell - it would be nice to put someone on Mason Cox.
Considering so called "Spud" Rory Lobb had 6 marks inside 50 for 2 goals 3 behinds and 2 goal assists.
Why would we need Frampton for Cox? He's only 3cm taller than Butts who would be the obvious choice. Collingwood only played two tall forwards last week
So you’re playing Frampton up forward despite sucking at it last year? And if we don’t have the confidence Butts can handle Cox we’ve got a problemFrampton gives us a lot more flexibility.
Will provide the same up forward as Himmelburg (next to nothing).
Could also play a defensive fwd role on Darcy Moore if he starts to dominate. And would also be able to go to Cox if Butts can't go with him.
If Butts, who is clearly our best defender, can't go with Cox, what makes you think Frampton can?Frampton gives us a lot more flexibility.
Will provide the same up forward as Himmelburg (next to nothing).
Could also play a defensive fwd role on Darcy Moore if he starts to dominate. And would also be able to go to Cox if Butts can't go with him.
So you’re playing Frampton up forward despite sucking at it last year? And if we don’t have the confidence Butts can handle Cox we’ve got a problem
You've found your new Mackay!Frampton gives us a lot more flexibility.
Will provide the same up forward as Himmelburg (next to nothing).
Could also play a defensive fwd role on Darcy Moore if he starts to dominate. And would also be able to go to Cox if Butts can't go with him.
If Butts, who is clearly our best defender, can't go with Cox, what makes you think Frampton can?