- Sep 13, 2019
- 4,746
- 5,296
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Yep, melbourne having a crap night. Pretty boring game though.Brisbane going not too bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yep, melbourne having a crap night. Pretty boring game though.Brisbane going not too bad.
Spot on … they always try and get betterThey’ve got an awesome but developing midfield with ?s over the front and back. Reckon they’re probably where we were in our prelim days under Craig and couldn’t quite get there without a genuinely strong KPF. But what I rate about them is that even if they get the player wrong, they identify what they think will help and work out a way to get them.
Forward, back and ruck. I'm not sure why they got Lycett on big contract when Ryder was there who then he ended up leaving after trying to play him forward, a better option was to develop a ruckman with Ryder as the lead ruck. Fantasia was always going to return to SA and supposedly we also "interested in him" lol and then there was Rockliff who they got him as a FA on a big contract (why?). Only Dixon was understandable as why they recruited him as the initial missing link since they needed a key forward but paid a lot for him so all the players they've recruited seemingly like they just took them as they wanted to join Port Power.They’ve got an awesome but developing midfield with ?s over the front and back. Reckon they’re probably where we were in our prelim days under Craig and couldn’t quite get there without a genuinely strong KPF. But what I rate about them is that even if they get the player wrong, they identify what they think will help and work out a way to get them.
I wonder if rozee, jhf and butters combined will out score Jeremy Cameron or Charlie Curnow?Ask Freo how easy it is to win games consistently with a very good midfield and average forwardline. Since when are forwardlines easy to patch on the fly?
Port’s midfield will win them a lot of games, but their lack of dominant key forwards could cost them some too. Will need to rely on a decent number of goals from the midfield, which Rozee, Butters and JHF are all capable of.
We obviously learned nothing from getting Fog to 50 games.
Every game Himmelberg plays in front of Thilthorpe is a waste of time and resources
Of course it doesn't. You've missed the point. Nothing we say here makes any difference. So you may as well enjoy yourselves.
We obviously learned nothing from getting Fog to 50 games.
Every game Himmelberg plays in front of Thilthorpe is a waste of time and resources
Haven't seen any credible argument as to why TT shouldn't be playing in the senior side.
We are a bottom rebuilding team with very few elite prospects.
The club really staggers me at times....
Because he doesn’t compete. At all. He won’t fly for marks when he’s the only tall there. He avoids body contact when rucking and just doesn’t have any competitive instinct. He has all the talent, but lacks desire.Haven't seen any credible argument as to why TT shouldn't be playing in the senior side.
We are a bottom rebuilding team with very few elite prospects.
The club really staggers me at times....
We obviously learned nothing from getting Fog to 50 games.
Every game Himmelberg plays in front of Thilthorpe is a waste of time and resources
I don’t even wanna hear their argument to this tbh because I know they’ll come up with some BS reasonHaven't seen any credible argument as to why TT shouldn't be playing in the senior side.
We are a bottom rebuilding team with very few elite prospects.
The club really staggers me at times....
Is this an issue since joining the Crows or was he like this at Westies?Because he doesn’t compete. At all. He won’t fly for marks when he’s the only tall there. He avoids body contact when rucking and just doesn’t have any competitive instinct. He has all the talent, but lacks desire.
You can’t just keep on picking a guy if he keeps on not doing what you have asked. Eventually he has to get the message.
Are you talking actual ruckwork as in the actual ruck contest? If you are I beg to disagree.I still think the club is hoping longer term that Thilthorpe and Himmelberg can be rotating ruck/forwards at the expense of ROB. This would mean ROB will be the one to drop out of the side, not Himmelberg. ROB is the bigger liability IMO and has already hit his ceiling. RT's ruckwork is already superior around the ground.
I haven't seen him "avoid body contact when rucking" and "won't fly for marks", I've seen him drop mark when he got first hand to them though.Because he doesn’t compete. At all. He won’t fly for marks when he’s the only tall there. He avoids body contact when rucking and just doesn’t have any competitive instinct. He has all the talent, but lacks desire.
You can’t just keep on picking a guy if he keeps on not doing what you have asked. Eventually he has to get the message.
Do you seriously think that he would have been gone inside 5 years, if he didn't have the 5-year contract? Whether it's a 3-year contract (which was justifiable), plus a 2-year extension (which he definitely would have got), or a 5-year contract outright - the result is the same. He was never likely to be delisted during this window, so why not just bite the bullet?God knows why.
He was the only second 5 year contract (Sloane was the first) and reckon club has learnt never to do it again.
It gave Milera security however we have not got our value and doubt we ever will.
AFL Tables - Wayne Milera - Stats - Statistics
afltables.com
Tell me what stands out if anything, from the above. I got nothing.
Especially given Himmelburg‘s game last week where he did sweet **** all..It really is beyond belief that RT isn’t playing
Valid points but you don't allow for flexibilityDo you seriously think that he would have been gone inside 5 years, if he didn't have the 5-year contract? Whether it's a 3-year contract (which was justifiable), plus a 2-year extension (which he definitely would have got), or a 5-year contract outright - the result is the same. He was never likely to be delisted during this window, so why not just bite the bullet?
I don't agree with 5-year contracts, because they represent too great a risk to the club - the club is tied to the player for a long period, even if their form falls off a cliff, or they suffer a career-ending injury. It's a bigger problem for older players, which is why giving one to Sloane was particularly stupid - less so for younger players like Milera.
It's easy to forget that he missed 2 whole years due to injury, and then spent the whole of 2022 getting himself back up to speed. Judging his lack of performance over this 3-year window is harsh.
As I said, I don't like 5-year contracts - but if you're going to give them to anyone, then giving them to a younger player who is unlikely to be a delisting candidate in that 5-year window is the player you should be giving them to. The fact that said player then suffers severe injury problems is bad luck, but it's not something that the list manager can reasonably foresee.
Because he doesn’t compete. At all. He won’t fly for marks when he’s the only tall there. He avoids body contact when rucking and just doesn’t have any competitive instinct. He has all the talent, but lacks desire.
You can’t just keep on picking a guy if he keeps on not doing what you have asked. Eventually he has to get the message.
The Lynch roll would be good for hims**t, that sounds terminal. Or perhaps we could design a role that is more suitable. I don't recall Tom Lynch being a competetive beast that lived for the contest. Otherwise, we're looking at another McAsey, becsuse what you just described is unfixable if not corrected by year 3. And it's not like he hasn't played his share of 2s.
No current season stats available
It really is beyond belief that RT isn’t playing