- May 2, 2011
- 14,579
- 7,654
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, CDFC, MUFC, Redbacks
Dare say the pies look like premiership material, amazing what a new coach can do...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Dare say the pies look like premiership material, amazing what a new coach can do...
It's a complete bovine faeces retort because if the club had stuck to that Primus would still be our coach and Hinkley would never have been appointed. Hinkley was an untried assistant when given the head coach job at Ports.This is why the argument 'Who else are they going to get to coach?' is a BS retort. ...
The guys just had eye surgery on a serious injury, give him a break!Imagine watching this game with an American who's never seen the sport before and explaining that the only American guy in the whole competition is the guy wearing sunglasses.
There's a very good reason he's wearing glasses and it has nothing to do with his place of birth.Imagine watching this game with an American who's never seen the sport before and explaining that the only American guy in the whole competition is the guy wearing sunglasses.
I tend to agree with you, it's not that Wines isn't good he's just not silky smooth, the same can be said for Boak as much as I like Travis, Drew is a similar type.How about you tell me where I’m wrong.. you reckon we have an elite midfield do you? Maybe you should stop looking at stats and what how we use it and where our biggest deficiency is
Hinkey Hankey lol.Constant loser talk from the coach creates a team of losers. Who'da thunk it.
I’m certainly not sticking up for hinkley.. he’s ****ed up this club good and proper, I’d be happy to drive the prick to gws if required. but our midfield isn’t good enough (yes ruck included) and he’s been shown up in the biggest games. It’s why we can’t regularly beat top 8 sides. Our mids let’s us down 1st quarter of the prelim.We have the players to win a flag, its pretty obvious to anyone that isn't trying to excuse Hinkley's failures. Our midfield is fine personnel wise with one major exception. Ruck. Hinkley (as confirmed by Montgomery today) does not rate hitouts as an important stat. Wines, Boak, Rozee, Butters and Drew roving to Max Gawn would be unstoppable.
The fact our players are mentally weak is the fault of our head coach and his loser language. You're trying to back Hinkley with his player blaming strategy. Its basic and Im sick of seeing you pedal it.
Spot on and add that our rucks are poor as well. We are one superstar midfielder short (JHF maybe?) and one quality ruckman short (make a play for grundy?) until we get that we won’t win a flag.I tend to agree with you, it's not that Wines isn't good he's just not silky smooth, the same can be said for Boak as much as I like Travis, Drew is a similar type.
We definitely need a pacey mid with good ball skills. Imo the Bont is a good mid and does a fair bit around the ground, not comparing him to Wines or Drew because they are different types of player, our issue is we have to man of the same type, just like we have to many HB flankers.
You can't question Wines, Boak or Drew as far as work rate goes but they are not highly skilled players, Boak would be the hardest off season trainer in the AFL but he doesn't have those smooth skills.
Dare say the pies look like premiership material, amazing what a new coach can do...
FTFYI don’t buy that our midfield wasn’t good enough, either.
West Coast won a flag with Shuey, Sheed, Yeo and Redden as their frontline quartet, sans Naitanui who had done his ACL.
Pick any four guys you like playing at or near their best together over the journey and we could trump that: Ryder, Lycett, Boak, Gray, Wines, Wingard, Ebert, Rockliff, Polec, Hartlett,Kornes, Butters, Houston, Amon… the list goes on.
Good kicks, bad kicks, offensive-minded, defensive-minded, fast, slow, tall, short, left-sided, right-sided, tough, soft, creative, dour, sloppy, clinical, whatever the case may be,
It doesn’t matter a jot when your brainstrust is strategically and tactically inept.
It's the players
It's the recruiting team
It's the fitness team
It's the supporters
It's anyone except Hinkley
It's the players
It's the recruiting team
It's the fitness team
It's the supporters
It's anyone except Hinkley
Heard Montgomery suggestion Teakle might get a game ‘but basically he insinuated it’s a work in progress’ kinda thing.
They are already making excuses.
What is it with this loser mentality.
We have been a work in progress for a decade. Its a soft way of kicking the can down the road to avoid expectations.Why is this “loser mentality”?
The worst of this would be its effect on Hayes, but mostly because it came along with a statement that Finlayson/Dixon is a better setup. By itself, I don’t see an issue.
What am I missing?