Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah no 38 for Meek for mine. 4th rounder or gtfo
Is Scully and Lemmy seriously in the toilet now?
9 months ago they were the best thing since sliced wholemeal gluten free on rye.
**** thatWow.
Only way that happens is if he is out of contract and we have a very low psd pick.
You need to pay a premium for any ruck with potential. They are a rare commodity.
We've interviewed Broadbent, I take that as we know he's talented perhaps just hampered by that injury.Add Broadbent to that list.
From potential 1st rounder to rookie. Maybe.
Hopefully we have said we will draft him so dont go have too big a season. Shin splints are not fun at all.
He's worth 2. I just can't see us doing that although I'd like it if it happened. (may ruin future trade relations though)PSD Jackson please, or downgrade 2 to 14 for Jackson. Use the leverage.
Melbourne don't have pick 14. They traded it to Sydney last yearPSD Jackson please, or downgrade 2 to 14 for Jackson. Use the leverage.
2 --> Jackson + 14
14. Hewett/Sybkowski/Phillipou
20. Keeler/Ginbey/MacKenzie
26. Gilbey/D'aloia/Ryan
38. Broadbent/Hagan
Dunno. Collingwood seem fine after screwing StK out of Luke Ball... Worth extra $'s to Jackson to save pick 2.He's worth 2. I just can't see us doing that although I'd like it if it happened. (may ruin future trade relations though)
Well that's stuffed up my plans for early retirement... next year's first it is!Melbourne don't have pick 14. They traded it to Sydney last year
I don't think we would go for Georgiades if we got Jackson.If we somehow end up with Jackson and Georgiades and a couple of draftee mids that's not bad
On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
So going back some 10 months ago, the AFL majority thought the Demons had won the trade of future first. Sorry - the mega deal with Saints, Dees, Crows and Dogs has now settled
View attachment 1507013
With all clubs out of the premiership race. the conclusions can be drawn
Demons - a net loss of pick 50
View attachment 1507006
Crows - a net loss of pick 49
View attachment 1507007
Saints - a net gain of pick 67
View attachment 1507009
Doggies - a net gain of pick 37
View attachment 1507011
So Dogs got the big premium of pick 17 in points a 49% premium of nearly 500 points. A bit higher than I would have expected for pick 17 but I suspect Adelaide thought they would be higher.
So next time the football donkey reporters state who won out of trades, I have learnt to wait for the fullness for time before taking victory laps.
Well done Dogs, you did well.
I hope that the Lions do not expect the same.
So you want to revisit this deal in 2034 when ALL their careers are all done and dusted?Well to wait for the fullness of time you need to wait to see what those draft picks are used on. If pick 17 is a gun and picks 23, 44, and 45 are duds, then the Doggies *ed it up.
Nicely worked out AsterixTheGaul , yet the fact that AFL Draft pick values are wrong screws up the perceived maths. (Later draft picks should be worth much less) Winder/Jamieson/O'neill/Foley ≠ Nick DaicosSo going back some 10 months ago, the AFL majority thought the Demons had won the trade of future first. Sorry - the mega deal with Saints, Dees, Crows and Dogs has now settled
View attachment 1507013
With all clubs out of the premiership race. the conclusions can be drawn
Demons - a net loss of pick 50
View attachment 1507006
Crows - a net loss of pick 49
View attachment 1507007
Saints - a net gain of pick 67
View attachment 1507009
Doggies - a net gain of pick 37
View attachment 1507011
So Dogs got the big premium of pick 17 in points a 49% premium of nearly 500 points. A bit higher than I would have expected for pick 17 but I suspect Adelaide thought they would be higher.
So next time the football donkey reporters state who won out of trades, I have learnt to wait for the fullness for time before taking victory laps.
Well done Dogs, you did well.
I hope that the Lions do not expect the same.
* that
How can you draft them at pick 69, play them for only 13 games in five years, trade in an expensive replacement and then expect to get pick 38 in return??
Well that's stuffed up my plans for early retirement... next year's first it is!
If CCJ is worth pick 20 then Meek is worth a top 5 pickBecause he's looked pretty competent in those 13 games? Where he was taken is irrelevant now
I don't think anyone in the league would disagree that he's worth ~ pick 40, especially with such a dearth of ruckmen going around
If CCJ is worth pick 20 then Meek is worth a top 5 pick
Haha, that was gross mismanagement by Norf.
I want their 1st from next year back as well.Nup. Next years draft crop is much better than this years by reports.
Straight pick 2/3 is more than fair
Aint that the truth. Woke AFL rewarding mediocrity.It's OK, the AFL will give them a priority pick to make up for it.