List Mgmt. “It’s a form of tanking” the Richmond rebuild

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

I would call it dramatic but you post stuff like this often.

All I said was you aren’t going to draft the best player which is unanimously ashcroft, and that the draft is a very even one without elite standouts at the top end. It’s a deep draft but not an elite one, which works well with your 8 top 30 picks anyway.
It's not unanimous. It took me 15 seconds on Google to find some alternative views from various opinion based ranking sources. Certainly he's number 1 in some eyes, but he's not a daylight consensus 1 like Harley Reid was.
 
How is this thread still a thing?

I'd almost forgotten about it. But the same olds trolling Tigers, who then troll right back.


View attachment 2154125 or View attachment 2154126
People are just upset that after decades of incompetence at Tiger land, they finally pulled a finger out, won a few flags and continue to make good moves afterwards instead of going back to said incompetence. Fair play to the Tigs.
 
Tell that to Graham's free agency compensation pick.

Also while we're on the topic of poorly run clubs, you'd think that your mob would've checked that Chris Scott's new gig that clearly breaches the soft cap and is an obvious cash grab doesn't break any rules...
They did check.. the AFL approved it.

Jack graham wasn’t a fair compensation?? What the heck did you expect for jack graham??
 
Tanking is doing it on purpose. Richmond didn't ask the 4 players to leave. We are however making the best of the situation. No doubt the media will muddle it up "they cut too hard," etc.
The thing that's interesting about this is the difference in narrative between these 4 leaving and Brisbane's Go Home 5. Y'all are being criticised for tanking when one wonders about the coach-player connection since you've changed them, how that's going.

A player who is contracted who is happy where they are - even if they're at the arse end of the ladder - isn't moving. One wonders why the focus here isn't a bit more on Yze, why the narrative is so completely on list management.
 
The thing that's interesting about this is the difference in narrative between these 4 leaving and Brisbane's Go Home 5. Y'all are being criticised for tanking when one wonders about the coach-player connection since you've changed them, how that's going.

A player who is contracted who is happy where they are - even if they're at the arse end of the ladder - isn't moving. One wonders why the focus here isn't a bit more on Yze, why the narrative is so completely on list management.
That's actually a very good point.

Maybe there is internally, but interesting there's been nothing from the media.

I must admit, my assumption is that the club has had a mature conversation with the players in question, maybe after getting a sense of their intention to go home/move on anyway, and helped them on their way as they are comfortable with their longer term strategy.
 
The media are vultures - whichever team loses in any week they are all over them with whatever they want to say and whatever agenda they are pushing - they mostly just fabricate stories to sell clicks. Best not to listen to them and certainly dont believe them. AFL media is unique because most the journos have strong ties to certain clubs or hatred of other clubs or individuals and unfort they wield a lot of power
Easier said than done.

If the beltings come thick and fast they’ll light a fire under your club and whatever plan or process that made sense of trade week will start to get shaken by the constant barbs and back page stories questioning if it was the right move.
“They should have held Bolton and Rioli, and how did they let Graham go? Surely they give him what he wants?”.

I can guarantee they’ll flip from the very complimentary way they’ve viewed your trade week when the heavy losses come early in 2025, as we expect they will.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. “It’s a form of tanking” the Richmond rebuild

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top