Yes we sent them flowers and chocolates after the deals.We, on the contrary, very respectfully took Brucey and Steele off their hands
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes we sent them flowers and chocolates after the deals.We, on the contrary, very respectfully took Brucey and Steele off their hands
He barracked for North as a kid, let alone his father's connection with the club.
If he leaves, I'm backing he will go to the Kangas. Good for them I'd say.
Kelly is gone. Just a question of where.
They'd want more than TreloarWould North part with their round 1 pick? You'd imagine so, if we want him we need to offer something that is more appealing to them. Player and a pick.
The likely reality is they will need to move someone and they will want bang for their buck. Qustion is are we desperate enough to pay the farm to get him or are we more of a money ball club? Can't see us giving up our current advantaged position for one player.They'd want more than Treloar
god damnit makin me log in.
Roberton has gone from averaging 19 touches last year, to 25 this year. Webster averaged 15 last year, 20 this year.
Because they don't have to go third man up, they can wait at the drop and run it out.
Brown and Carlisle have been great.
1. It won't happenWhat would happen if Kelly went in to the draft ala Luke Ball??? If he was picked with the #1 pick would he have to go? and be paid a draftees salary????
I think GWS accepted slight 'unders' for Steele but were happy to complete the trade because of the professional way the two clubs negotiated with each other.
St Kilda never publicly made their desire to trade for Steele, and Steele never declared his interest in St Kilda, until after GWS completed their season. I think that is very important.
A new franchise like GWS craves respect from their football peers. They know they will lose some elite talent, the smart clubs will deal courteously and confidentially.
GWS doesn't like a club like North leaking to the media that they intend to recruit one of their best young players on a huge long term contract during the season. I'd be ropable if another club did that to us. It is disrespectful and intended to destabilise.
If Kelly wants to return to Melbourne to play his football there is one less club that can win his services.
What would happen if Kelly went in to the draft ala Luke Ball??? If he was picked with the #1 pick would he have to go? and be paid a draftees salary????
If Kelly nominates North he will get to North irrespective of what GWS says. Look at what they said about Tom Boyd the days after the Bulldog offer.
Very little, if anything, can done once he nominates.
Yep, precedent has been set. Nothing you can do about it.No Ball nominated his price so he'd just say he's not moving for under $1 million a year and not attend medicals for the clubs he doesn't want to go to. Ball got away with it and the AFL obviously saw nothing wrong there.
If we have any chance of getting Kelly we must get him. Even if we have to pay him 10 mill over a decade. Be brave & don't **** it up.
I don't want to pay him that kind of money but agree we need to do everything to get him, he's a much better player than Whitfield.
Not sure where to type this, but I wouldn't mind seeing Billings play Montagna's role in defence when Joey hangs the boots. He doesn't have to be offensive weapon forward of centre, he could still be one the back half. I just don't think he is a pressure act kind of guy, which you need in the forward half. I think he would do well playing the Hodge role for the hawks.
I've never been so confident in a player becoming absolute top shelf elite. He's even a chance to win the Brownlow this year, he's clearly been GWS's best player with Toby Greene second imo.
Also, I read somewhere that with the new CBA coming in the average salary will see an increase of about 70k pa. By my estimates paying Kelly 1 mill a year is like paying closer to 800-850 pa on the current agreement. We could also front load the **** out of his contract & pay him 1.5 a year for the first three years or so. Depends if we have any other players/FA's in our sight.
1 mill a year will be the norm in 5 years.
he's not awful I'm overstating it but he doesn't offer what we need IMO. They way we played last year was much more mobile and attacking from deep guys like Roberton are needed to move the ball out for the two lump backs who are really just stoppers who neutralise the talks but the way footy is played now so much of the scoring comes from the smaller players in the forward line. He has very good passages but it's not really giving us anything better than we had. We need to defend from the midfield still and require all our forwards to double back to sure up the defence still so I don't get what they add other than height.
He won't be able to defend at all.Not sure where to type this, but I wouldn't mind seeing Billings play Montagna's role in defence when Joey hangs the boots. He doesn't have to be offensive weapon forward of centre, he could still be one the back half. I just don't think he is a pressure act kind of guy, which you need in the forward half. I think he would do well playing the Hodge role for the hawks.
I don't want to be critical, but Joey can't defend either.He won't be able to defend at all.
Rather him forward of centre if not in the middle