List Mgmt. 2017 Trade & FA Targets Part 1

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
What if rocky is going hell for leather because it's his last contracted year and is chasing the $$$ only to then do an armo or Daisy Thomas and go back to spud like

I.e. we could be buying at his absolute peak here only for him to never get back there again

Good point but i would back Rockliff's class any day .
 
I thought against Collingwood it was the best a backline of ours had performed as a group since probably the Lyin years.

Our biggest issues by far have been the midfield (and getting smashed in the ruck against Melb and Coll) and our terrible kicking for goal. And running out of steam late against the better sides we've played. West Coast had 50 more disposals than us in the last and Geelong a whopping 70 more. Our pressure took a big dive after 1/4 time against Melb and they outscored us by 50+ from that point on.

Yes yes and yes .The midfield problem is as much a ruck problem as anything else.
Hickey didn't seem to have the same spark early in the season ,and it was no coincidence that we were being beaten in the clearances .
As for Bruce in the ruck , well it is really not his go .He is not aruckman and his game suffers from confidence because of it .As soon as they find an competitive alternative to the second ruck the better the clearances and last quarter fade outs will be .
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Can't wait to see who gets pilfered from the GWS list this year. Would take Greene in a heartbeat. Hate the little campaigner but can play.
Would run rings around any small forward on our list and can play midfield.

On SM-G930F using BigFooty.com mobile app
No way the Giants let him go, he's a star.

We should have grabbed him when they were shopping him around a couple of years ago.
 
Didn't we bring in Carlisle to play as Back/Ruck?. But Bruce went into ruck cause of Carlisle suspension last year. Bruce or Rooey could be sent down back when Carlisle is rucking. Bringing in either Paddy will be handy.

I've not heard that from the club at all, only from here.
 
Enough is enough with the personal attacks on this board!

This Big Footy board is a safe place for St Kilda supporters to discuss all things about our team and express different views.
This is NOT Bay 13 or the main AFL board so please tone it down.

We, the moderators of this board, Kildonan Armitage2Riewoldt and I have have observed a large increase in the number of posters potting each other for little or no reason.

We have now recently received a number of complaints from respected posters about the demise of this board and we are genuinely concerned.
We are not about to stand by and see this board deteriorate into a daily / weekly slanging match between particular posters.

IT NEEDS TO STOP AND STOP NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...ead-them-before-posting-on-this-board.324902/
We refer you to the list of Golden Rules clearly articulated by Kildonan above.

Of particular note is rule number 3. No personal abuse. Treat your fellow posters with respect. If you disagree with something someone said - GO THE BALL NOT THE MAN - explain how you see the issue without attacking the poster.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! PLAY BY THE GOLDEN RULES OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Fox Footy just said that GWS CEO Dave Matthews declared that Josh Kelly would not be traded to North Melbourne under any circumstances. Matthews said North have no players that would interest the Giants in any trade.

Sounds like the Giants are furious with North's public intent to grab Kelly with a huge long term offer during the season proper.

If GWS can't fit him into their salary cap and have to trade Kelly they will want 2 things in any trade:

1. Adequate compensation.
2. Respect from their trading partner.

Bitterness and anger are bubbling to the surface. North's public intent has backfired spectacularly.
 
Fox Footy just said that GWS CEO Dave Matthews declared that Josh Kelly would not be traded to North Melbourne under any circumstances. Matthews said North have no players that would interest the Giants in any trade.

Sounds like the Giants are furious with North's public intent to grab Kelly with a huge long term offer during the season proper.

If GWS can't fit him into their salary cap and have to trade Kelly they will want 2 things in any trade:

1. Adequate compensation.
2. Respect from their trading partner.

Bitterness and anger are bubbling to the surface. North's public intent has backfired spectacularly.

We, on the contrary, very respectfully took Brucey and Steele off their hands
:D
 
We, on the contrary, very respectfully took Brucey and Steele off their hands
:D

I think GWS accepted slight 'unders' for Steele but were happy to complete the trade because of the professional way the two clubs negotiated with each other.

St Kilda never publicly made their desire to trade for Steele, and Steele never declared his interest in St Kilda, until after GWS completed their season. I think that is very important.

A new franchise like GWS craves respect from their football peers. They know they will lose some elite talent, the smart clubs will deal courteously and confidentially.

GWS doesn't like a club like North leaking to the media that they intend to recruit one of their best young players on a huge long term contract during the season. I'd be ropable if another club did that to us. It is disrespectful and intended to destabilise.

If Kelly wants to return to Melbourne to play his football there is one less club that can win his services.
 
Post deleted
That is so not a nice thing to say about Armitage.

For god sake he played with injury all of last year and he is now injured and needs surgery. We should be thankful that he played through his injuries and not have a go at him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top