List Mgmt. 2019 Draft and Trade Hypotheticals Thread

[caesar88]

Thing that has me doubting Paps is the fact he’s done nothing to stifle all this talk. If he was committed to the club and to honouring his contract, how hard would it be to shut it down in one fell swoop? Like Parker did on Instagram last year.

 

[6yearsold]

I think so. Pick 8 gets it done IMO:

I think age profile, position and contractual status would mean it would need to be a premium pick to make it happen.

The swans would need to sell this one to their members that they were willing to let him walk with a year (or an un-triggered 3 years) to go on his contract. The only way they do that is for overs (Pick 8) IMO.

How do you know it is untriggered?

Pick 8 is not enough IMO and I would be disappointed with that return.

 

[MITSUHIRATO]

How do you know it is untriggered?

Pick 8 is not enough IMO and I would be disappointed with that return.

My understanding is that it’s the same as the Levi Casboult situation.

The player may have triggered some clauses for an automatic contract extension, but he still needs to agree to the new deal.

Casboult automatically triggered a contract extension this year, but hasn’t accepted this new deal and will invoke his free agency status.

 

[MITSUHIRATO]

Wow amazing!
The fact Casboult has still been in your best 22 & is now hesitating to agree to a new deal at a bottom 3 club says he is very gettable.
Quick, do the Caboult for Paps trade now before they both change their minds.

I don’t understand what you are trying to say in this post.

 

[Tedeski]

I don’t understand what you are trying to say in this post.

I'm posting rubbish to reply to your rubbish of saying you work with Pap's girlfriend.
You go around the rumour threads to stir trouble & gloat on your own forum about it.
You said Brad Scott had the Saints job. What, you worked with Scott's partner too?

Spare me pal. You've sucked in our mods as they deleted my post but left yours on here.
Congrats for that alone.

 

[tombomb]

I think so. Pick 8 gets it done IMO:

I think age profile, position and contractual status would mean it would need to be a premium pick to make it happen.

The swans would need to sell this one to their members that they were willing to let him walk with a year (or an un-triggered 3 years) to go on his contract. The only way they do that is for overs (Pick 8) IMO.

I don’t think pick 8 (or 5 or 9) is overs.

Papley is 23 and one of our best players, not to mention contracted.

Top 10 pick would be a minimum imo, and pick 8,9, or 10 I would still be unhappy.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

I don’t think pick 8 (or 5 or 9) is overs.

Papley is 23 and one of our best players, not to mention contracted.

Top 10 pick would be a minimum imo, and pick 8,9, or 10 I would still be unhappy.

First rounder +2nd rounder for Papley + our third (or 4th)...

Still don't want to lose him though!

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

I don’t think pick 8 (or 5 or 9) is overs.

Papley is 23 and one of our best players, not to mention contracted.

Top 10 pick would be a minimum imo, and pick 8,9, or 10 I would still be unhappy.

It isn't so much that he's one of our best players, although he is.

It's the type of player he is. There are perhaps 3, maybe 4 players in the competition who can perform that role to his standard. That makes him more valuable from a supply/demand perspective (same as why Hannebery and Mitchell were less valued).

 

[tombomb]

It isn't so much that he's one of our best players, although he is.

It's the type of player he is. There are perhaps 3, maybe 4 players in the competition who can perform that role to his standard. That makes him more valuable from a supply/demand perspective (same as why Hannebery and Mitchell were less valued).

I think the biggest issue would be losing a really good player who is about to enter that sweet spot of his prime.

The problem with our list for the last 3 years has been that gap between young fringe players and older players. The last thing we can afford to do is lose a good player who is about to hit that middle range, let alone 2 with Jones.

 

[6yearsold]

My understanding is that it’s the same as the Levi Casboult situation.

The player may have triggered some clauses for an automatic contract extension, but he still needs to agree to the new deal.

Casboult automatically triggered a contract extension this year, but hasn’t accepted this new deal and will invoke his free agency status.

How do you know?

 

[Tedeski]

Carlton Football Club are a joke.

have a read of this.

Blues not on "same page" with trade targets: Edmund

“There’s a lot of chefs down there and there’s a lot of broths as well."

www.sen.com.au

"Carlton is having issues working out who they want to target in the upcoming trade period, according to SEN Breakfast’s Sam Edmund.
The Blues have a number of people behind the scenes with a say in who they should approach in the trade period and Edmund believes there are disagreements going on at Ikon Park.
“They’ve gone nowhere on the pursuit of Tom Papley. The Swans have been really strong that he’s staying put, we know he’s contracted for four more years,”

“The mail is the Blues aren’t on the same page in some cases and that’s causing some confusion, but it certainly does seem as though they’re all-in for Papley.”


HOOLEY DOOLEY! Hehehehe.................

 

[MITSUHIRATO]

I don’t think pick 8 (or 5 or 9) is overs.

Papley is 23 and one of our best players, not to mention contracted.

Top 10 pick would be a minimum imo, and pick 8,9, or 10 I would still be unhappy.

I think the fact that we are a (seemingly) desperate buyer would give the swans an advantage to pull for more.

Every man and his dog knows that we are in the market for a small forward, so it wouldn’t surprise me to see Harley and Co squeeze us for more.

I think 8 is fair though.

 

[Wayne Swan]

I think so. Pick 8 gets it done IMO:

I think age profile, position and contractual status would mean it would need to be a premium pick to make it happen.

The swans would need to sell this one to their members that they were willing to let him walk with a year (or an un-triggered 3 years) to go on his contract. The only way they do that is for overs (Pick 8) IMO.

After the GC PP & GWS Green matching your pick 8 becomes pick 10

 

[Jewelsbon]

Thing that has me doubting Paps is the fact he’s done nothing to stifle all this talk. If he was committed to the club and to honouring his contract, how hard would it be to shut it down in one fell swoop? Like Parker did on Instagram last year.

Yes I've thought the same thing.
I know someone who knows Papley on a social level and he made out to her that he was pretty happy here in Sydney- living his childhood dream was the actual terminology.
He also never bothered to mention to her- or her friend whom he got pretty up close and personal with, that there was a GF in Melbourne

 

[Swansujelly]

Yes I've thought the same thing.
I know someone who knows Papley on a social level and he made out to her that he was pretty happy here in Sydney- living his childhood dream was the actual terminology.
He also never bothered to mention to her- or her friend whom he got pretty up close and personal with, that there was a GF in Melbourne

probably best he does stay in Sydney for a while then..

 

[Superstar swan]

To get daniher i think we will have to let papley go

 

[The King!]

has anyone spoken with Papleys barister today?

 

[Jewelsbon]

has anyone spoken with Papleys barister today?

Barrister or Barista?

 

[The King!]

Barrister or Barista?

combined the roles

 

[MITSUHIRATO]

has anyone spoken with Papleys barister today?

Yep, said he’s leaving.

But in other news; he’s no longer having full cream milk.

 

[caesar88]

I like Paps and want him to stay but if we got pick 8 (or 10?) for him we should take that and run. The club won't be planning on staying down the bottom for long. Along with our pick 5/6, that's either two top 10 picks to use in the draft in the one year we're down here, or two top 10 picks to use to land an Angus Brayshaw or Brad Crouch. Win/win scenario.

 

[Banyo Bloods]

Thing that has me doubting Paps is the fact he’s done nothing to stifle all this talk. If he was committed to the club and to honouring his contract, how hard would it be to shut it down in one fell swoop? Like Parker did on Instagram last year.

Took a while for Parker to do it though (Really enjoyed it when he did). Maybe Paps is enjoying the speculation and having his profile out there earning him potential dollars for the next contract. Who knows but it's really only to satisfy the fans to quash this stuff.

 

[The King!]

Took a while for Parker to do it though (Really enjoyed it when he did). Maybe Paps is enjoying the speculation and having his profile out there earning him potential dollars for the next contract. Who knows but it's really only to satisfy the fans to quash this stuff.

he could feel the contract stifles the talk
Or saw daniher deny things and it only fuel speculation, they cant win sometimes

 

[DST]

Took a while for Parker to do it though (Really enjoyed it when he did). Maybe Paps is enjoying the speculation and having his profile out there earning him potential dollars for the next contract. Who knows but it's really only to satisfy the fans to quash this stuff.

When joining all the dots on this, I think Papley has a lot more on his plate than responding on social media at present.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Wayne Swan]

Yes I've thought the same thing.
I know someone who knows Papley on a social level and he made out to her that he was pretty happy here in Sydney- living his childhood dream was the actual terminology.
He also never bothered to mention to her- or her friend whom he got pretty up close and personal with, that there was a GF in Melbourne

At that moment in time in his mind he didn't have a GF in Melbourne! Maybe he's toying with the idea of trading up to a Sydney girl?