If it’s 10, Future second & Acres then I’ll be very happy.
I assume we’ll throw some shit their way as well
I assume we’ll throw some shit their way as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
NopeSorry if this has already been covered but is the option of Brad staying with us gone?
So obviously Morris's tweet was just an inference (okay made up) based on the fact they'd traded out a future pick as part of the Howard / Ryder deal. Since he new about it ahead of the public with his connections he made an attempt to get in first. You'd like to believe he'll be laughed out of town for it, but I doubt it.
Why do people dislike the idea of Acres so much? Something happened to him this year, but he played pretty well in '17-18 and was looking like he'd be a good player. Maybe we could get him back on track.
Gees settle down will yaAcres. Bloody hell. Bell fu**.ed it up. Unbelievable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10, future 1st and Acres for Brad, a future 2nd and future 3rd. Or walk.
Loved that movie as a kid.Freo fans lining up to melt in the morning like:
View attachment 764967
I hope you are speaking literallyIf it’s 10, Future second & Acres then I’ll be very happy.
I assume we’ll throw some shit their way as well
Agree but in context were we seriously going to get #10 and future 1st without something like a future 2nd going back? a future 1st is not equal to Acres + future 2nd BUT future 1st - future 2nd MIGHT = future 2nd + AcresI mean, once we sign Acres I'll bang on about how great he is and all that, but Acres + future 2nd is a long way from a 1st rounder.
You started a thread called 'Suck shit saints'! LOLGod St Kilda fans are a bunch of pompous twats
I'd happily send something back with 10 + 2020 first.Agree but in context were we seriously going to get #10 and future 1st without something like a future 2nd going back? a future 1st is not equal to Acres + future 2nd BUT future 1st - future 2nd MIGHT = future 2nd + Acres