Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Without question that we wasted our time, however, I doubt we wasted his.
After all, at least Brett can now say he was on an AFL list, and I assume there are some additional perks with being in that environment for a few months that he wouldn't had access to at Glenelg.
Part of the sales pitch that the rebuild is "on track" was the success of the SANFL side.C'mon, that's not true.
They're winning an SANFL flag for the 150 people that turn up?
If nothing else, they don't want to win because they don't want the SANFL being vindictive with them in the future. Self interest said they don't want to win.
I think they planned to keep Turner, but they also planned to trade Crouch, Sholl and others. Plans changed as circumstances did
I've added a few more for completeness those who have played a significant portion last year or will this year.Adelaide - O'Brien - Developed
Brisbane - McInerney - Developed / Fort (traded)
Carlton - De Koning - Developed (Pittonet traded but see DK as they're future)
Collingwood - Cameron (traded)
Essendon - Draper - Developed / Phillips (traded)
Fremantle - Darcy (Developed) / Jackson (traded)
Geelong - Blicavs (Developed / Stanley - traded)
GC - Witt's (traded)
GWS - Preuss (traded) / Flynn (developed)
Hawthorn - Reeves (Developed) / McEvoy (Traded) / Lynch (traded)
Melbourne - Gawn (Developed) / Grundy (traded)
North - Goldstein (Developed) / Xerri (developed)
Port Power - Lycett (traded) / Hayes (Developed)
Richmond - Nankervis (traded)
St Kilda - Marshall (developed) / Ryder (traded)
Sydney - Hickey (traded) / Ladhams (traded)
West Coast - NicNat (Developed) / Williams (Developed)
Dogs - English (Developed)
11/18 Clubs developed their own ruckman with possibly Port and Geelong adding to that number in the next 12-18 months.
Majority of those youve added aren't the number one ruck, or have retired so doesn't really reflect the actual conclusion.I've added a few more for completeness those who have played a significant portion last year or will this year.
Developed: 16
Traded: 15
Suggests there's no right or wrong way to go about it.
Nice workAdelaide - O'Brien - Developed
Brisbane - McInerney - Developed
Carlton - De Koning - Developed (Pittonet traded but see DK as they're future)
Collingwood - Cameron (traded)
Essendon - Draper - Developed
Fremantle - Darcy (Developed)
Geelong - Blicavs (Developed / Stanley - traded)
GC - Witt's (traded)
GWS - Preuss (traded)
Hawthorn - Reeves (Developed)
Melbourne - Gawn (Developed)
North - Goldstein (Developed)
Port Power - Lycett (traded) / Hayes (Developed)
Richmond - Nankervis (traded)
St Kilda - Marshall (developed)
Sydney - Hickey (traded)
West Coast - NicNat (Developed) / Williams (Developed)
Dogs - English (Developed)
11/18 Clubs developed their own ruckman with possibly Port and Geelong adding to that number in the next 12-18 months.
The difference is the vast majority of other clubs have given themselves a chance of using either option, develop their own ruck and trade. We have effectively decided to rule out one of those options and are now stuck with a trade.I've added a few more for completeness those who have played a significant portion last year or will this year.
Developed: 16
Traded: 15
Suggests there's no right or wrong way to go about it.
The difference is the vast majority of other clubs have given themselves a chance of using either option, develop their own ruck and trade. We have effectively decided to rule out one of those options and are now stuck with a trade.
Doesn’t it concern you that we’ve practically gone it alone in limiting our options?
Unless of course by some miracle we decide next year will be the first year since 2014 we’d draft a developing ruckman.
Well we can’t hit though can we if we are not in the game?Developing is so hit and miss though. Look at Port last year. Have a first rounder developing for a few years - and then when Lycett went down they hardly played him and went makeshift options instead
Not the highest priority I don’t think. What I did like about Barnett is he has shown a bit as KPD so that would have been nice for an option
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Hey ROB showed a bit in the TAC Cup at CHB as well. Weve never tried him there though in SANFL or AFLDeveloping is so hit and miss though. Look at Port last year. Have a first rounder developing for a few years - and then when Lycett went down they hardly played him and went makeshift options instead
Not the highest priority I don’t think. What I did like about Barnett is he has shown a bit as KPD so that would have been nice for an option
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
he would get it, kick it and it would end up closer to goal than where he started and hes not chipping it backwardsHey ROB showed a bit in the TAC Cup at CHB as well. Weve never tried him there though in SANFL or AFL
Yeah not sure i'd wanna see ROB picking up Buddy, Jez or a King brotherHey ROB showed a bit in the TAC Cup at CHB as well. Weve never tried him there though in SANFL or AFL
Did a decent shut down job on the very athletic Darcy Moore (2 goals) in a TAC Cup Final who just happened to be considered the best KPf prospect in the land at the time.Yeah not sure i'd wanna see ROB picking up Buddy, Jez or a King brother
Well, if we go back to last year, only looking at #1 ruck...Marshall hardly played ruck until the end of the year, and Blivcas was only ruck when Stanley was injured.Majority of those youve added aren't the number one ruck, or have retired so doesn't really reflect the actual conclusion.
The current numbers (mine) show that most clubs are developing their own number one ruck.
Was hardly a surprise to see it.ROB can think what he likes but he's off my Christmas list for meeting with Jordan Peterson and then proudly posing for photos with him.
ROB couldn't man up father christmasYeah not sure i'd wanna see ROB picking up Buddy, Jez or a King brother
And to weaken Glenelg'sIt feels like Turner was only brought in to bolster our midfield for SANFL finals.
We should have grabbed Panos.And to weaken Glenelg's
You’re out!!We should have grabbed Panos.
Nah, Harry Boyd...We should have grabbed Panos.
Yes this sickens me in the guts to be honest after previously defending the club's actionsIt feels like Turner was only brought in to bolster our midfield for SANFL finals.