Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks mate!It basically just says that in the press conference he said that he expects answers from their players soon so that they can be prepared for their moves. And it again mentions North as Logue's main suitor. But only a mention. No details.
Quote from article below...
“I suppose the timeframe is going to come pretty soon,” Longmuir said when asked when Fremantle will want to know about Lobb, Acres and Logue.
“We’ve got the players for, at the most, another week, then they’re off on holidays, so I’d imagine we’ll get some answers soon.
“We’ll work through that. Trade period starts after the granny and we want to make sure we’re ready for that, so those conversations will happen in the next week or so.”
Saints board think they’ll get PP 19 for Hill
Hill is a massive downhill skier.
Don't want him anywhere the club.
Seems reasonable to me,Saints board think they’ll get PP 19 for Hill
While not much, I think this bodes well for us re Logue. If he hasn't re-signed yet, he's not going to now with a week to go (based on Longmuir's comments).
Different circumstances. We know Bailey is most likely staying and a new contract is a formality, while every major report linked to Griffin is that he wants out. Whether it is to us is another thing.You mean then that Bailey is assured not to sign with us either then???
Freo board want TT for Logue, or 19 + plus favourable change.Saints board think they’ll get PP 19 for Hill
Haha I’m fairness, I feel like that hypothetical aside, the Freo board’s expectations of the Logue trade are much more realistic then the Saints wanting a top 10 for Clark and 19 for 900k Hill.Freo board want TT for Logue, or 19 + plus favourable change.
Saints board think they’ll get PP 19 for Hill
He's also a 3 time premiership players in one of the best teams in the AFL era.Hill is a massive downhill skier.
Don't want him anywhere the club.
Also, if we had 22 blokes that work as hard defensively as well as offensively, then we'd be one of the worst skilled teams in the comp.Hill is a massive downhill skier.
Don't want him anywhere the club.
Don’t know why turner and atu haven’t been delisted yet -1 it’s not like they are trade able
So you’re telling me BB wasn’t worth 2 first rounders!?Bigfooty Boards: Unrealistic Expectations Since 2002
They giving Clark and long also if they want a chance at thatSaints board think they’ll get PP 19 for Hill
Just don't want Hill even if free. We have a number of players: Scott, Taylor, Stephenson, and Goater for starters who all could make a wing their own.Saints board think they’ll get PP 19 for Hill
If we got Logue for a PP at pick 19 plus change then we've done very well. Remove the TT part of that discussion and that's a more than reasonable deal from the Freo board.Freo board want TT for Logue, or 19 + plus favourable change.
I’d take pick 80 and 81 over Turner/atu - you just have to look at the rookie draft to see there’s quality better than those twoWe have f*** all draft capital and it appears most of our players are wanting to stay.
So I assume it has to do with list spots and not knowing what sort of picks we’d be looking at filling them with.
Currently we need 2 list spots. Pick 1 and Cooper and given that Cooper would wipe out most of the rest of the points picks we have that third player would likely be a pick in the 80s? More cuts more later picks to fill spots.
We desperately need the draft assistance so that we can cut for quality and not for wild speculation.
Pick 19 for an overpayed wingman who turns 30 next. Rightio.Saints board think they’ll get PP 19 for Hill
Nah we're aiming to get the whole 2017 draft on our list.Could sleevo be used in any trades