List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part III

[stavro#4]

Going against the afl media reports is Browney

 

[koshari]

View attachment 1534264

i also heard Ice baths are optional to HC if he comes across, ;-)

 

[bergholt]

What's the middle ground?

Don't know but if we give them anything else along with pick 9 and Clark for pick 3 then we're getting absolutely reamed.

That deal already values him as low as pick 25, the more we add the worse that value gets.

 

[stavro#4]

What about Clark and next years first ?

We keep 9.

 

[#gosaintas]

Our team lacks skill. That's the area we've been let down time and time again for a decade.

We have a player with class and skill to burn and we're looking to get rid of him.

It's f*cking insane.

If we can't buy a player with skill then we can at least sell one. JUST DO A DEAL. ANY DEAL.

 

[bergholt]

If it’s Dutch or German beer we’d have to at least hear the offer out

No Heineken tho

 

[Saint Shags]

Haha a future first on top?

**** right off Rawlings.

 

[bergholt]

What about Clark and next years first ?

We keep 9.

I'd do that

 

[ERMAHGERD]

 

[stavro#4]

Haha a future first on top?

* right off Rawlings.

Clark, GC second and our first next year.

For 3 and. Pick 40?

 

[Saint Shags]

What about Clark and next years first ?

We keep 9.

If we think that the 2 we get in this year will be better than waiting next year. And if we can somehow improve.

 

[bergholt]

i also heard Ice baths are optional to HC if he comes across, ;-)

Apparently the last negotiating point is how much of a head start he gets in the time trial. He wants 500m, club only wants to give him 200m.

 

[stavro#4]

If we think that the 2 we get in this year will be better than waiting next year. And if we can somehow improve.

Well as someone else said.

We can get a first for Wang potentially next year.

 

[Hayes4PM]

Why would we trade a contracted Clark for anything not weighted in our favour? Are North just desperate for a trade they can say they “won” this period? To hang their hat on to fans??? There’s no way we should be offering more than Clark and 9 for 3.

 

[koshari]

Nah I reckon at least a couple of slabs as well. Imported beer too not just VB.

Will be Colonial (CB Co) Pale ale

 

[bergholt]

Well as someone else said.

We can get a first for Wang potentially next year.

Except he'll only want to go to Port and they already don't have a first, so that already has the makings of a cluster****.

 

[BrutThough]

Come on, you know if we don't get anything until next year we'll all be sooking it up at draft time.

But think about all the melts next year every time Port win a game.

It's a 12 month gift for us all.

 

[CursingFijian]

So who we getting with pick 3 and 9?

 

[TheOsprey]

be St Kilda FC, recruit Ayce or Zaine Cordy (can’t remember which one) after an underwhelming year


View attachment 1534194


You just… you couldn’t have picked a worse time to start messaging me Saints…

I got this too and read it as, “PLS don’t cancel your direct debit b4 Monday ”

 

[Saintscomemarchingin]

Who are we after? with pick 4 is interesting. Ashcroft & Cadman gone, would leave us to pick one of, Jye Clark, Sheezel, Tasatas or Wardlaw

 

[Tommy Wigs]

Clark, GC second and our first next year.

For 3 and. Pick 40?

Issue is that it could well be pick 6 next year. I’m not totally against the Port first idea, but would still like to swap back in for a second pick.

 

[billings2paddy]

i also heard Ice baths are optional to HC if he comes across, ;-)

just like having a head coach is optional at north

 

[bergholt]

Will be Colonial (CB Co) Pale ale

No deal

 

[Sully111]

Why would we trade a contracts Clark for anything not weighted in our favour? Are North just desperate for a trade they can say they “won” this period? To hang their hat on to fans??? There’s no way we should be offering more than Clark and 9 for 3.

We shouldn't be offering clark and 9 for 3

 

[stavro#4]

What's the middle ground?

Gc pick, Next years saints first, Clark

For

3 and a pick 40 something