Diehard Saint
Brownlow Medallist
I think we handled it really well.I think there is an argument to be made about whether we were used as a pawn.
Ultimately it does look that way - seeing as he Is apparently staying.
The actual argument is, if we rated him - should we have gone balls deep on an offer and blown the pies away?
But then you get into the waters of being negligent with someone who has issues with behaviour.
Very fine line. So it’s easy to see how people sit on either side of it.
We have been interested in him for a while, but made a responsible offer, treating him as an adult - not silly money which could have blown up in our faces.
So, we didn’t get him. It’s pretty unusual for a player who is happy at his club to leave and staying would have been his first option. However, far from being left with egg on our faces, I believe it is Collingwood who come out of this looking pretty weak. They backed down because we forced their hand, so all their posturing about behavioural clauses turned out to be just that, posturing. And this is on top of caving into Grundy’s demands for a nine year contract previously.
The Pies have lost a certain amount of leverage in their negotiating with players in the future I believe, because player and managers just have to dig their heels in and there’s a chance they’ll cave.