I reckon if someone bids on him before 25-30 we'd have to stop and think about matching. Probably still would but it's food for thought.Whats the point of nominating him then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I reckon if someone bids on him before 25-30 we'd have to stop and think about matching. Probably still would but it's food for thought.Whats the point of nominating him then?
What I mean is what’s in it for the player if he’s not guaranteed to be taken by his nominated club in the national draft?I reckon if someone bids on him before 25-30 we'd have to stop and think about matching. Probably still would but it's food for thought.
He most likely gets to play for the club of his choice, which his Dad played for.What I mean is what’s in it for the player if he’s not guaranteed to be taken by his nominated club in the national draft?
That can happen if we draft himHe most likely gets to play for the club of his choice, which his Dad played for.
That's the whole concept of father sons.
Now it's very, very likely as we have 1st dibs.That can happen if we draft him
Got Langford clearly ahead of SmillieWhat do people think about Josh Smilie? Would he be a good fit for us if Smith / Draper is gone?
Is he the one slower than Crouch?Got Langford clearly ahead of Smillie
We have to nominate him to have first rights on a bidWhat I mean is what’s in it for the player if he’s not guaranteed to be taken by his nominated club in the national draft?
So we’re passing on another one and letting him go to Kuwarna! TypicalWhy Kuwarna?
I get that, it works for us, but the player doesn’t seem to get much, I can understand if they go high and the collateral was a lot, but with a later pick?We have to nominate him to have first rights on a bid
JonesI wouldn't say that. We could choose to not pick Crouch, Laird, Murphy, Berry.
I'm not totally certain. There are 2 separate F/S Nomination dates - today (31st Oct) and Friday 22nd November. The November date pre-selects them in the RD, so you don't need to worry about being gazumped.Vader going back to the Ben Jarman drafting ....it was at the time, if you nominated a father / son in the main draft, you were obligated to take him ....UNLESS, he was bid on, then you could refuse to meet the bid
It's why we only nominated Jarman as a Rookie father son ....and not in the main draft
Is this still the case now with Welsh ?
Yes, they do.I get that, it works for us, but the player doesn’t seem to get much, I can understand if they go high and the collateral was a lot, but with a later pick?
Does the player automatically go on to the rookie list if no one picks him?
Concern for me over Smilie was he didn't step up when the quality stepped up - ie at the Nationals - although he wasn't terrible, which leads to the thought that maybe he was bullying the general U18 league with his size advantage. Not a great mark for his height but a very good kick. Wonder if he'll potentially be a defender rather than mid. Good player - maybe 7-12 range rather than the top echelon.What do people think about Josh Smilie? Would he be a good fit for us if Smith / Draper is gone?
He’s slow but the highest metres gained player in the draft , not as slow as crouchIs he the one slower than Crouch?
Surely you want to be a decent mark to be a defender, especially at that height.Concern for me over Smilie was he didn't step up when the quality stepped up - ie at the Nationals - although he wasn't terrible, which leads to the thought that maybe he was bullying the general U18 league with his size advantage. Not a great mark for his height but a very good kick. Wonder if he'll potentially be a defender rather than mid. Good player - maybe 7-12 range rather than the top echelon.
You're probably right... which doesn't make it any less ****ing stupid!
Yeah I'm not sure why anyone is annoyed about it reallyI actually think it is the opposite of stupid.
In sure plenty of people would have never heard the Aboriginal names of places … it’s great that more people are made aware.
Or are you one of those “it’s Ayer’s Rock” thinkers?
If you want people to change their views or actions, you want them to be slightly uncomfortable with their current status quo. But directly challenging them about their views/ actions has been shown to be counter productive to change.I actually think it is the opposite of stupid.
In sure plenty of people would have never heard the Aboriginal names of places … it’s great that more people are made aware.
Or are you one of those “it’s Ayer’s Rock” thinkers?
I think it's more that he hasn't often pushed forward and taken big contested marks that you might expect from a 195cm guy - in a way Langford has at 190cm. That would take him to next level as a prospect. Although you could level the same criticism at Cripps and he seems to have worked out ok.Surely you want to be a decent mark to be a defender, especially at that height.
Expect - Draper if available, Langford over Smith if Draper goneI’d love to get a feel for what we all would - EXPECT - HOPE - HATE - from our first pick on draft night … so there aren’t the classic rewrites of history after the draft!! It’s so easy to take pot shots at decisions when you never specifically lay out what you would have done … after the fact.
For me:
EXPECT - to pick Draper because he is from SA.
HOPE - pick Langford because he is the best player available at our pick.
HATE - we move back in this draft to get a player we “love” and move the surplus collateral into next year OR even worse, we just use pick 4 on a player that is rated much lower!