Hmm ok. This is news to me.If he's dressed up as Jarryd Hayne and ****ed a sex doll, he's made fun of rape. And I can't see the AFL being overly impressed about that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmm ok. This is news to me.If he's dressed up as Jarryd Hayne and ****ed a sex doll, he's made fun of rape. And I can't see the AFL being overly impressed about that
Hmm ok. This is news to me.
Those details, which help explain why the AFL has acted so harshly over what was otherwise a private event, include claims a player dressed up as former NRL and NFL player Jarryd Hayne and interacted with a blow-up doll during an offensive skit.
Now we can package those crap picks and move up next year because somebody else wants to trade so they can take a FS or Academy player. It's neat resource management.Our biggest advantage was if he was good enough to go pick 1 which we get a big discount on and get to use a bunch of crap picks to acquire. All the advantage is lost because he’s slipped so far that we get no benefit whatsoever.
Geelong players wouldn't be out on the p*ss. Not at their age.I'm the opposite of the "woke is bad" Neanderthals out there but agree. Ridiculous.
Would anything happen if this was geelong?
I would argue differently as I recognise humour done well can help raise discussion of issues we usually keep private when talking about them is much betterpersonally feel the 911 stuff was pretty off. due to the scale of death and destruction. anyone knowing someone affected by those 3,000 ish deaths and the tens of thousands more still mentally scarred (my partner was a few hundred metres away and saw the plane hitting) would never contemplate taking the piss out of this event. and thinking about it further, probably similar for many other skits inc making a joke of sexual assault (allegedly - I certainly dont know all the details)
I dont want to apportion blame but Geelong skirting the edges maybe allowed some players to push even furtherWas certainly a weird route to go down.
Unless bid comes in the second round (which sounds unlikely) which causes problemsI think in the past we've been fairly upfront where the potential f/s sits on our talent order. The good news is we have the extra 3rd rounders next year to eat into in case a bid does come a touch early.
Geelong players wouldn't be out on the p*ss. Not at their age.
If you can’t understand the difference between dressing up as goal posts and taking the piss out of rape and a terrorist attack that killed thousands of people then I don’t want to debate this with you further,I would argue differently as I recognise humour done well can help raise discussion of issues we usually keep private when talking about them is much better
But the main issue I have is its not suspension worthy no matter the odious nature of the dress up
Do I get upset because 3 Geelong players dressed up as goalposts and Keays or do I laugh at the whole situation created and recognise the AFL screwed up and Geelong took the opportunity to 1. Highlight it 2 Take the opportunity to have fun at our expense
People need to stop reacting like Maude Flanders
This is the point thoughIf you can’t understand the difference between dressing up as goal posts and taking the piss out of rape and a terrorist attack that killed thousands of people then I don’t want to debate this with you further,
You're kidding right?I don't think there is much to query there, outside of it falling in the broader trend of we clearly don't care for this draft after pick 4.
I kind of agree with the club as well. It's put up or shut up time for this iteration.
And yet Ginnivan dressed up as a serial killer.It's from here:
‘Emotionally drained’: Greene’s manager reacts to controversial post-season event as huge fine could be ‘too much’
‘Emotionally drained’: Giants star’s manager reacts to controversy as huge fine could be ‘too much’www.foxsports.com.au
You're kidding right?
Then we must be just about the only club that don't rate this draft after pick 4 because every list manager and recruiter spoken to over the last month or so on Trade Radio and other media has said the opposite. I.E it's a quality draft that runs very deep.
The problem is you can't bring in quality proven players and retain your full array of draft picks along with the fact this is a very hard draft to secure picks from other clubs who obviously rate this draft.
List spots was the problem mostly.
The clubs failing has been re-contracting several players that it should have moved on.
List management make that call not Hamish and his recruiters.OK then, what decision has Adelaide made that shows we care about this draft past pick 4.
Remember we didn't have to sign anyone up to contracts if we didn't want too.
What tha? The contracts that we signed up years ago that we are stuck with aren’t some sign that 2024 draft isn’t rated.OK then, what decision has Adelaide made that shows we care about this draft past pick 4.
Remember we didn't have to sign anyone up to contracts if we didn't want too.
To be fair that should be a decision with Hamish input.List management make that call not Hamish and his recruiters.
Clearly getting in proven players was number 1 strategy.
Thats on Nicks and the selection committee but the club could play hardball and delist him and pay him out, so that’s on them as wellTo be fair that should be a decision with Hamish input.
Letting Smith hit his trigger seems like a poor move by the club.
I'm sure he would have had input but it's clear what list management's strategy has been for some time re Silvers public statements.To be fair that should be a decision with Hamish input.
Letting Smith hit his trigger seems like a poor move by the club.
Don't disagree on the strategy to get players in, very happy with that outcome.I'm sure he would have had input but it's clear what list management's strategy has been for some time re Silvers public statements.
You're probably right but final list lodgements are a while off yet, stranger things have happened.Don't disagree on the strategy to get players in, very happy with that outcome.
But to let Smith hit his trigger means we don't have the opportunity to trade back into this draft, maybe even that Dobson range.
Maybe we would have still decided to not trade in because we have plans for 2025 to use those picks on Wanganeen-Milera.
Ultimately I think 2026-2027 list looks very promising if we can add 2 or 3 more quality players over the next 18 months.
Keep living in fairy land where the grass is always greenYou can talk. You and Jeff have been labouring this Welsh attitude issue since Sunday.
Don't you think you've got your point across?