Rumour 2024 Rumours and Speculation Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Many posters have pointed out repeatedly why Nicks isn't competent with regard to game plan strategy, yet you continue to come up with excuses that make no sense. Nicks' poor coaching record speaks for itself!

You are correct that being incompetent means we will go nowhere, which is why so many were annoyed when AFC extended Nicks as we are going nowhere!

Our only hope is with Davis taking over the game plan strategy coming from a successful club, which is basically covering up Nicks isn't up to the job.
A bunch of fans on a message board have angrily posted their opinions on Nicks, sure.

Some of the opinions are fair enough, some are impossible to know from the outer.

I'm not even a massive Nicks fan. The only difference is he's mostly done about what I expected during a rebuild. I also occasionally give him the benefit of the doubt when things don't go to plan - but as I've said, all the excuses that come with a rebuild end this year.
 
A bunch of fans on a message board have angrily posted their opinions on Nicks, sure.

Some of the opinions are fair enough, some are impossible to know from the outer.

I'm not even a massive Nicks fan. The only difference is he's mostly done about what I expected during a rebuild. I also occasionally give him the benefit of the doubt when things don't go to plan - but as I've said, all the excuses that come with a rebuild end this year.
Why do you think the club appointed Davis and have given him the responsibilities he has? Because Nicks was doing well in those areas or badly?
 
Many posters have pointed out repeatedly why Nicks isn't competent with regard to game plan strategy, yet you continue to come up with excuses that make no sense. Nicks' poor coaching record speaks for itself!

You are correct that being incompetent means we will go nowhere, which is why so many were annoyed when AFC extended Nicks as we are going nowhere!

Our only hope is with Davis taking over the game plan strategy coming from a successful club, which is basically covering up Nicks isn't up to the job.
You keep repeating this BS .....same as you recently tried to put words in my mouth, as to what I am supposed to have said

This is pure BS ....and anyone who had a modicum of footy intelligence would understand Davis is not in charge of the gameplan

He has never developed a gameplan at AFL level .....no head coach would ever hand responsibility for the gameplan to him, and then be held personally responsible

Kane, you simply make stuff up
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Why do you think the club appointed Davis and have given him the responsibilities he has? Because Nicks was doing well in those areas or badly?
It's the closest we have got an admission from the club they ****ed up reappointing Nicks... for the reasons most of us have been pointing out.
 
You keep repeating this BS .....same as you recently tried to put words in my mouth, as to what I am supposed to have said

This is pure BS ....and anyone who had a modicum of footy intelligence would understand Davis is not in charge of the gameplan

He has never developed a gameplan at AFL level .....no head coach would ever hand responsibility for the gameplan to him, and then be held personally responsible

Kane, you simply make stuff up
Lol Wayne... the club is on record that Davis is looking after game plan strategy.

So many have given you direct quotes.

Yet, here you are still in denial.
 
Why do you think the club appointed Davis and have given him the responsibilities he has? Because Nicks was doing well in those areas or badly?
Why do you think George ......I'll give you a hint, follow the GEEL review outcomes with Bomber Thompson

If you're open-minded, you can soon work it out
 
You keep repeating this BS .....same as you recently tried to put words in my mouth, as to what I am supposed to have said

This is pure BS ....and anyone who had a modicum of footy intelligence would understand Davis is not in charge of the gameplan

He has never developed a gameplan at AFL level .....no head coach would ever hand responsibility for the gameplan to him, and then be held personally responsible

Kane, you simply make stuff up
I think all the coaches would have a degree of input into the game plan but the final say is with Nicks not Davis.
 
You keep repeating this BS .....same as you recently tried to put words in my mouth, as to what I am supposed to have said

This is pure BS ....and anyone who had a modicum of footy intelligence would understand Davis is not in charge of the gameplan

He has never developed a gameplan at AFL level .....no head coach would ever hand responsibility for the gameplan to him, and then be held personally responsible

Kane, you simply make stuff up
Pot Kettle Black.

Have you ever responded to your claim that all the fantasy players know Wilkie is a turnover merchant when the stats prove the opposite?
 
You keep repeating this BS .....same as you recently tried to put words in my mouth, as to what I am supposed to have said

This is pure BS ....and anyone who had a modicum of footy intelligence would understand Davis is not in charge of the gameplan

He has never developed a gameplan at AFL level .....no head coach would ever hand responsibility for the gameplan to him, and then be held personally responsible

Kane, you simply make stuff up
You clearly don't have that bit of intelligence
 
I think all the coaches would have a degree of input into the game plan but the final say is with Nicks not Davis.
Yes, you're correct !

The philosophical discussion has always been, do you develop a gameplan to suit the personnel at your disposal .....or a gameplan that'll win Grand Finals, and then recruit players for that gameplan

It was obvious early, we were eveloping a gameplan around contested footy ....in fact the Crows are in the top 3 contested footy sides in the AFL .....but we're poor on opposition transition ....and our rebound off HB, that people are critical about, was off the back of losing Milera, and Smith falling off the perch
 
Why do you think George ......I'll give you a hint, follow the GEEL review outcomes with Bomber Thompson

If you're open-minded, you can soon work it out
That’s easy, I’ll just quote the key stake holders:

Silvers - gameplan, execution, development and manage assistant coaches
Davis - go into a game with a plan, stick to it and manage playing a game of AFL
ROO - coach the coach

That leaves Nicks to manage relationships and front the media, aka Hinkleylite.

Now given what Silvers, Davis and Roo have said, what do you think Davis’s role and therefore Nick’s role?

No critical thinking bullshit, actually spell it out or will this go the same way of you failing to explain shape?
 
Pot Kettle Black.

Have you ever responded to your claim that all the fantasy players know Wilkie is a turnover merchant when the stats prove the opposite?
Try staying on topic .....however, you are free to quote me where I said this .....not what you think I said
 
Yes, you're correct !

The philosophical discussion has always been, do you develop a gameplan to suit the personnel at your disposal .....or a gameplan that'll win Grand Finals, and then recruit players for that gameplan

It was obvious early, we were eveloping a gameplan around contested footy ....in fact the Crows are in the top 3 contested footy sides in the AFL .....but we're poor on opposition transition ....and our rebound off HB, that people are critical about, was off the back of losing Milera, and Smith falling off the perch
Our transition was shit even with Milera in the team at the beginning of the year, it’s because Nicks changed our gameplan and went defensive, it’s why you criticised Nicks coaching and said he went rogue bonkers. Do we need to bump your quotes again?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Try staying on topic .....however, you are free to quote me where I said this .....not what you think I said
You mean this:

I'm guessing you watched very few SAINT's games, if any, apart from the Crows .....and you would have not been focussing on Wilkie

I watched all SAINT's games .....but I watch games differently to you, given my involvement with SuperCoach and AFL Fantasy ......we're all looking for bargains, and DEF players who turn balls over are not viewed favourably ....he's not a great decision maker
 
Silvers - gameplan, execution, development and manage assistant coaches
Davis - go into a game with a plan, stick to it and manage playing a game of AFL
ROO - coach the coach
You're not bright George, or you're simply here looking for arguments ....

None of that says Davis is developing the gameplan .....he himself said he's there to support Nicks, and you'll find that's ensuring the vertical understanding & compliance of the agreed gameplan at all levels of coaching & development

You do zero research on any subject, shoot from the hip with any thought that denigrates the club .....strangely though, you are completely intolerant of anyone criticising your Norwood

You yourself have said your passion lies with Norwood NOT the Crows .....and it shows thru in your continued denigration of the club
 
You're not bright George, or you're simply here looking for arguments ....

None of that says Davis is developing the gameplan .....he himself said he's there to support Nicks, and you'll find that's ensuring the vertical understanding & compliance of the agreed gameplan at all levels of coaching & development

You do zero research on any subject, shoot from the hip with any thought that denigrates the club .....strangely though, you are completely intolerant of anyone criticising your Norwood

You yourself have said your passion lies with Norwood NOT the Crows .....and it shows thru in your continued denigration of the club
lol. So you love the club more than me and that means you ignore critical thinking to blindly follow, I love them less and are actually critical when they **** up rather than blindly follow, ok I’ll pay that.

Ok let’s say Nicks creates the gameplan, I agree he would have final say. But given what Silvers, Davis and Roo have said, I won’t repeat them all, what are Nicks responsibilities?

As for research, what’s your research? Coming up with the 6 week acceptance theory for logos ignoring the raptor ;)
 
Man the last few pages have been a hard read, you'd think we were a top 4 side the way it has been defended
I want to know when I’ve said my passion lies with Norwood and not the Crows, sure if Norwood came into the AFL they’d be my no 1 team but I’m not going to drop the Crows.

Being an inaugural member, being to all 3 grand finals, constant posting about the Club doesn’t make me a passionate Crows supporter because I’ve been a Norwood supporter since aged 5.

Welcome to Waynus World
 
I want to know when I’ve said my passion lies with Norwood and not the Crows, sure if Norwood came into the AFL they’d be my no 1 team but I’m not going to drop the Crows.

Being an inaugural member, being to all 3 grand finals, constant posting about the Club doesn’t make me a passionate Crows supporter because I’ve been a Norwood supporter since aged 5.

Welcome to Waynus World
Yeah, I don't have to read Waynes posts anymore, for $250 you could have him put on ignore

Worth.Every.Dollar.
 
Yeah, I don't have to read Waynes posts anymore, for $250 you could have him put on ignore

Worth.Every.Dollar.
You paid $250 to have Wayne on ignore?

Wow, perhaps this is why Chief made him moderator to make more money lol.
 
I’ll fill you in, he asked for proof where he said Wilkie turned the ball over because as a fantasy thing it’s a big focus. I posted it. He stopped posting.
If only... ;)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour 2024 Rumours and Speculation Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top