List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part II

[Samsquanch]

They'll pick him up, he'll have a great season and this board will complain that we should have got him.

We'd better up our offer then so that doesn't happen.

 

[Makeshift Park]

Introduce one premiership player to each line.

Split 2 for Armstrong, Berry and pick 39
Draft gerreyn with pick 22
Trade pick 39 for Luke Parker

26

Luke Parker

Age

32

Ht

183cm

Wt

88kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

24.2

5star

K

12.6

5star

HB

11.6

5star

M

3.8

4star

T

5.6

5star

CL

5.8

5star

D

22.1

5star

K

12.3

5star

HB

9.9

5star

M

3.9

4star

T

5.0

5star

CL

5.5

5star

D

21.2

5star

K

11.4

4star

HB

9.8

5star

M

2.0

3star

T

8.0

5star

CL

5.2

5star

Trade pick 40 for Joe Richards
Trade pick 58 for Jack Darling

27

Jack Darling

Age

32

Ht

191cm

Wt

95kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

12.1

3star

K

7.9

3star

HB

4.2

3star

M

5.0

5star

T

3.0

5star

G

1.9

5star

D

8.0

2star

K

4.3

2star

HB

3.7

3star

M

2.7

3star

T

2.4

3star

G

1.3

5star

D

14.6

4star

K

7.6

3star

HB

7.0

5star

M

6.0

5star

T

4.0

5star

G

1.4

5star

Trade f2 for Caleb Daniel

35

Caleb Daniel

Age

28

Ht

171cm

Wt

72kg

Pos.

M/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

21.3

5star

K

11.5

4star

HB

9.8

5star

M

3.5

4star

T

2.9

4star

CL

1.4

4star

D

19.5

4star

K

11.1

4star

HB

8.4

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

2.0

3star

CL

1.0

3star

D

16.4

4star

K

7.2

3star

HB

9.2

5star

M

3.4

4star

T

2.6

4star

CL

0.2

2star

Draft Stevens with pick 64

Round one:

Archer - Logue - Corr
Daniel - Chom - Goater

Kerch - Parker - Scott
Xerri - LDU - Sheezel

Richards - Darling - Berry
Curtis - Larkey - Duursma

Int: Zurhaar / Wardlaw / Powell / Simpkin / Fisher

 

[dus]

Is Nathan O’Driscoll gettable?

 

[The Big O]

Bookmark this now!


If we get Darling he will, game for game , kick more goals in the season and be more dominant than Zuurhar...

I have two responses.

1. I agree with this statement.
2. This statement is not a positive.

On SM-S901E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[krakouers]

Is Nathan O’Driscoll gettable?

Out of the Freo lineup most of the year due to injury but should sign a new deal
Linked in the paper the other day to Power:

Out-of-contract O’Driscoll in Power’s sights

Port Adelaide are interested in out-of-contract Fremantle wingman Nathan O’Driscoll as several Dockers remain in limbo ahead of next season.

thewest.com.au

“Sources have told The West Australian that the Power, who will take on Geelong in the qualifying final tomorrow night, are eyeing O’Driscoll to add further outside run to their side.

O’Driscoll played the final two AFL games of the season after being hampered by a knee injury for most of the 2024, starting as the sub against Greater Western Sydney before giving the Power a first-hand look at his talents with 20 disposals and a goal.”

 

[Shermanator]

Introduce one premiership player to each line.

Split 2 for Armstrong, Berry and pick 39
Draft gerreyn with pick 22
Trade pick 39 for Luke Parker
Trade pick 40 for Joe Richards
Trade pick 58 for Jack Darling
Trade f2 for Caleb Daniel
Draft Stevens with pick 64

Round one:

Archer - Logue - Corr
Daniel - Chom - Goater

Kerch - Parker - Scott
Xerri - LDU - Sheezel

Richards - Darling - Berry
Curtis - Larkey - Duursma

Int: Zurhaar / Wardlaw / Powell / Simpkin / Fisher

Mate if we could do all that I would happily have Darling..

 

[ChairmanZia]

But why are we not attractive destination for top players?

The answer is not as obvious as because we are at bottom.

Firstly: We don't have anywhere near the top 8 medical team.

Second: Our ability to develop players is terrible.

Third: Post career opportunities

We need to forget about recruiting any xyz names until we professional raise the standard drastically first.

 

[swaeney]

But why are we not attractive destination for top players?

The answer is not as obvious as because we are at bottom.

Firstly: We don't have anywhere near the top 8 medical team.

Second: Our ability to develop players is terrible.

Third: Post career opportunities

We need to forget about recruiting any xyz names until we professional raise the standard drastically first.

I think the answer is we are at the bottom

 

[hilly]

But why are we not attractive destination for top players?

The answer is not as obvious as because we are at bottom.

It is.

 

[swaeney]

It is.

Worst performing team in the history of the AFL? Is that true?

 

[Orange Peanut]

I’m happy with landing just the below 3 experienced players then hitting the draft with 2 (or split it for 6 and 10/12) and 22

Pick in the late 50s for darling
Pick 40 for Parker
Future 3rd for Lobb

Gives us flexibility with the ability to switch Lobb and comben either end

If we don’t get Lobb then happy to keep playing teakle as the KPF that pinch hits ruck but lose a bit of flexibilty of being able to swap with chom in game

B: Archer Logue Corr
HB: Goater Comben Mckercher

HF: Parker Lobb/teakle Simpkin
F: zurhaar larkey darling

And then on the bench you have a 7th forward and defender which could be a number of players

Are we really expecting Sydney to trade Parker for pick 40?

 

[The Nostradamus]

Are we really expecting Sydney to trade Parker for pick 40?

Yep that’s about what we gave up a contracted Higgins for who was in better form

If he demands out I can’t see them stopping it, allows adams a spot back in their side and Parker extends his career and earn more

 

[Gasometer]

Introduce one premiership player to each line.

Split 2 for Armstrong, Berry and pick 39
Draft gerreyn with pick 22
Trade pick 39 for Luke Parker
Trade pick 40 for Joe Richards
Trade pick 58 for Jack Darling
Trade f2 for Caleb Daniel
Draft Stevens with pick 64

Round one:

Archer - Logue - Corr
Daniel - Chom - Goater

Kerch - Parker - Scott
Xerri - LDU - Sheezel

Richards - Darling - Berry
Curtis - Larkey - Duursma

Int: Zurhaar / Wardlaw / Powell / Simpkin / Fisher

No McDonald’s?

 

[Shinboner1]

But why are we not attractive destination for top players?

The answer is not as obvious as because we are at bottom.

Firstly: We don't have anywhere near the top 8 medical team.

Second: Our ability to develop players is terrible.

Third: Post career opportunities

We need to forget about recruiting any xyz names until we professional raise the standard drastically first.

Also players don't want to play infront of 10k fans each week.

 

[krakouers]

No McDonald’s?

Eat healthy Gasometer

 

[chubbspeterson]

Also players don't want to play infront of 10k fans each week.

Some players care about that and some don't. It doesn't seem to bother Giants or GC players.
We might need to recruit more nonplussed country kids or Wardlaw types who don't care much about that going forward.

 

[Makeshift Park]

Are we really expecting Sydney to trade Parker for pick 40?

He’s gonna be 32 next season. Can’t see them needing much more.

 

[New_Roo]

Also players don't want to play infront of 10k fans each week.

That's on us... if we have 50k members take away 10k for pets, interstates, invisible family members, take 5k away as members just being away, should get min 30-35k weekly then with oppo supporters that should mean 40k each week minimum even with interstate clubs.... at marvel that will feel packed. Supporters no doubt will come when we start winning more


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Chip Scab1]

That's on us... if we have 50k members take away 10k for pets, interstates, invisible family members, take 5k away as members just being away, should get min 30-35k weekly then with oppo supporters that should mean 40k each week minimum even with interstate clubs.... at marvel that will feel packed. Supporters no doubt will come when we start winning more


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

We have the 3rd most amount of members in WA. Almost 10,000 paid up, awesome souls.

What you're saying is probably true, however realistically we should be getting
/aiming for 30,000 North fans at each home game - which seems pretty doable, especially if we are half decent!

We ought to focus on controlling the controllables first!

 

[Hazey1977]

I’m happy with landing just the below 3 experienced players then hitting the draft with 2 (or split it for 6 and 10/12) and 22

Pick in the late 50s for darling
Pick 40 for Parker
Future 3rd for Lobb

Gives us flexibility with the ability to switch Lobb and comben either end

If we don’t get Lobb then happy to keep playing teakle as the KPF that pinch hits ruck but lose a bit of flexibilty of being able to swap with chom in game

B: Archer Logue Corr
HB: Goater Comben Mckercher

HF: Parker Lobb/teakle Simpkin
F: zurhaar larkey darling

And then on the bench you have a 7th forward and defender which could be a number of players

That forward line will get absolutely murdered on the rebound. Way too slow.

Sent from my SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Hazey1977]

That should be a given at AFL or any elite level of competition.
Sure some younger players have to develop it, but you expect them all to do so.

But they don't, that's the conundrum.

Sent from my SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Rooboy1708]

Parker on SEN not ruling out North.

 

[Val Keating]

Listening to Luke Parker

26

Luke Parker

Age

32

Ht

183cm

Wt

88kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

24.2

5star

K

12.6

5star

HB

11.6

5star

M

3.8

4star

T

5.6

5star

CL

5.8

5star

D

22.1

5star

K

12.3

5star

HB

9.9

5star

M

3.9

4star

T

5.0

5star

CL

5.5

5star

D

21.2

5star

K

11.4

4star

HB

9.8

5star

M

2.0

3star

T

8.0

5star

CL

5.2

5star

just now on sen, sounds like he’s a very good chance he’s coming to North.

 

[giantroo]

Asked about North and his future- you can never rule out what the future looks like, he is contracted and enjoying the finals.

Have they reached out North?

I’ll focus on footy and my manager will look after that!

 

[Chip Scab1]

Happy use future picks on him, R3 and R4 selections and pay him a decent whack.

That should be enough if they win the flag!