Underrating Houston there a bit. he is genuinely one of the best half backs in the comp both offensively and defensively. Caleb Daniel can kick and retain the footy but he is a deplorable defender, his kicking also lacks depth and he has lost a bit of toe over the last few years. Daniel is maybe a slight upgrade on fisher, but in all reality, they are as equally as poor as one another, due to their terrible defending.
Don't get me wrong, Houston is a gun. I like fisher but he is expected to bite off more than he should sometimes being the only creative one back there... we see it with Kerch too... think Daniel is slightly better and maybe fisher more fwd of the ball... but couldn't have both on hb due to size and as you say lack of defending!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com