- Oct 9, 2003
- 46,893
- 45,902
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Eagles (NFL), Suns (NBA)
so much thisRiccardi is the one we should be chasing - still younger to be there when we move into the finals
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
so much thisRiccardi is the one we should be chasing - still younger to be there when we move into the finals
Macrae only makes sense if:
Our midfield is too slow on the spread as it is, Macrae is a plodder who would only exacerbate this problem. He also has no secondary position, can't hide him forward as he is next to useless. Would not be spending any draft capital on him.
- It is a Bulldogs salary dump and we are getting a useful pick in return for picking up what would be his rather substantial salary for the next 3 years, AND
- We do not manage to land Parker.
Maybe we swap 40 and 58 for Dogs 32 and 44 and we take the full salaryI doubt the dogs will give us a pick purely because they have none - they used them all on moving up for Ryley Sanders then didn’t play him
Macrae only makes sense if:
Our midfield is too slow on the spread as it is, Macrae is a plodder who would only exacerbate this problem. He also has no secondary position, can't hide him forward as he is next to useless. Would not be spending any draft capital on him.
- It is a Bulldogs salary dump and we are getting a useful pick in return for picking up what would be his rather substantial salary for the next 3 years, AND
- We do not manage to land Parker.
He signed a 3 year contract less than a year ago.so much this
I thought he was on 900kIsn't his salary only 650-750k range so won't be a salary dump as not huge money
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Sounds good. But with all these players you are bringing in we will need to do some more delisting if we want to use those picks. I like it.Maybe we swap 40 and 58 for Dogs 32 and 44 and we take the full salary
yeah but thay're not playing him, he's not getting a game. so maybe he's open to a move?He signed a 3 year contract less than a year ago.
Armstrong or Shanahan is the future, surely.
I thought he was on 900k
Hope so! With any luck, they'll win the GF without him, and he'll get pissed off, Noble style, haha.yeah but thay're not playing him, he's not getting a game. so maybe he's open to a move?
Love Parker and McRae perfectAssuming we delist Sellers, Lazz, Free, Taylor and Harvey (re-rookie or delist) how many can we realistically trade for?
Some chance of Parker, McRae, Darling (unfortunately) and one of Rosas/Owies. Daniel would be a good get too. If we bring in 4, how many picks does that leave in the National Draft? Ideally we’d want at least three right?
Then there's TT, Greenwood and Shiels.Assuming we delist Sellers, Lazz, Free, Taylor and Harvey (re-rookie or delist) how many can we realistically trade for?
Some chance of Parker, McRae, Darling (unfortunately) and one of Rosas/Owies. Daniel would be a good get too. If we bring in 4, how many picks does that leave in the National Draft? Ideally we’d want at least three right?
Just stop… some of us have given upRiccardi is the one we should be chasing - still younger to be there when we move into the finals
Well I'm not as keen on Macrae as Parker. Just suggesting what I'm hopeful the deal is if we take the full salary.Sounds good. But with all these players you are bringing in we will need to do some more delisting if we want to use those picks. I like it.
Didn’t he only have a 1x year deal?Any more, and we gotta pay-out one of Nyuon, Sleevo or CCJ.
What if we all kina got together and told him we think Ross Lyons is a coaching genius, the St Kilda list has the potential to go deep into September and we all think that for St Kilda in 2025 that IT's HAPPENING!!!!!Saints = perennial underachievers on the road to nowhere fast with a boring af coach.
Kangas = Young team on the rise with a 4x premiership winning coach + Sheezel and Wardlaw.
I know who I'd be choosing if I was McRae.
Is it still compulsory to take a minimum three draftees?Assuming we delist Sellers, Lazz, Free, Taylor and Harvey (re-rookie or delist) how many can we realistically trade for?
Some chance of Parker, McRae, Darling (unfortunately) and one of Rosas/Owies. Daniel would be a good get too. If we bring in 4, how many picks does that leave in the National Draft? Ideally we’d want at least three right?
Footywire has it as 2 years. It could be inaccurate. No one seems to know.Didn’t he only have a 1x year deal?
can see us paying Stepho out if we get someone in
Jay Clark reckons Parker will come. I'm not getting too excited until the season is over and he meets with Longmire.
Twomey claimed we'd offered a F1 for Houston but hadn't spoken to him. TAO's inside info is we didn't offer the F1.
What do Darling, Parker and Macrae have in common?
I don’t think so. A few teams last year only took two picks in the ND.Is it still compulsory to take a minimum three draftees?
Offerd F1 but didn't meet, that doesn't sound quite right...