3rd Test Border Gavaskar Trophy December 14-18 1050hrs @ The Gabba

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Surely if Khwaja and Labuschange dont score runs in the last 2 tests they don’t go to SL?

Hopefully Konstas goes ok and gets selected there as well and Jead moves up to open for that series allowing them to pick another middle order player who’s good against spin.

SL top order

Konstas
Head
Smith

Then the rest
Head is one of the best performing test batsmen in the world at the moment, i don't want to move him at all.
 
Yea I agree don't screw with the only batter that's excelling at present.
Head is one of the best performing test batsmen in the world at the moment, i don't want to move him at all.
Only for series in the subcontinent like SL/India where getting him early against the newer ball before the spinners come on.

Outside of those series then I completely agree about leaving him at 5.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Did you actually watch the footage of this or did you just read the bullshit manufactured drama the media tried to spin it in to? He didn't berate anyone, it was a polite exchange asking them to not film his children
I watched the filmed and recorded news report, and it definitely wasn’t a polite exchange, on Kohli’s behalf at least. Kohli accused the media of filming his children, which was totally incorrect as it turned out. This was pointed out to him, however that didn’t prevent him from berating the diminutive female reporter at length.

A caller to 3AW who witnessed the incident as it occurred said that what was shown on TV was a very truncated segment, and that Kohli continued to carry on behaving in a similar, bullying manner for some minutes.

And it’s not as if dear old Virat hasn’t got prior form for intemperate and obnoxious behaviour.
 
Last edited:
Have you watched him bat ? There is a guy for England who has a similar technique and is doing well. Hookes was the same and in a lesser way Hughes and both did OK. Exeptional eye / hand co-ordination for a young upstart can mask many technical issues. I will watch with interest - if he's able to "do his thing" it will be very entertaining.
Yes i have, I don’t classify him as a cross bat slogger. Which English player are you referring to specifically, i have watched a fair bit of them. Phillip Hughes was not a cross bat slogger either, he had a pretty big technical issue because instead of going back and across his back leg went to the leg side allowing him to open up the offside as he did early in his career until he got picked apart. David Hookes was my idol as a kid and i loved the way he batted but a Test batting of 34 and only one ton from 20 or so Tests over a seven or eight year period tells you that he wasn’t up to the level required and sadly if you asked him he would tell you that himself.

Being aggressive doesn’t make you a cross bat slogger. Konstas has all the tricks and i hope like hell he has the skills necessary to survive early against India.
 
Harry Brook.
Bloke can seriously play, very aggressive, fantastic eye but technically not too many issues. Just brought up in a different generation/system. He is the prototype of the modern batsman, capable of scoring monster scores and equally capable of being knocked over cheaply because he doesn’t take the time that an old school educated player would to play themselves in and get used to the conditions.
 
A player who hits the ball hard and far does so because of a good technique. Not despite.

Warner and Gilchrist are exhibits A and B.

Brook is pretty correct. So is Head.

Konstas seems able to adjust his game for limited overs cricket. Also keeps his head very still.

All of these contrast with actual sloggers like JFM.
 
Last edited:
Harry Brook.

I'm talking about batsman who regularly play across the line - pull / sweep / on drive balls pitched on middle / off / outside off to or over the boundary - not normal shots from the test handbook. Some can live by the sword if they're good enough. Rare though and usually don't last long. We shall see.

Brook plays a LOT through the off-side. If you think he’s a cross-bat slogger that fetches balls from the off to hit through the on, you haven’t been watching him that closely.

When he REALLY tries to up the ante he sometimes gets into that mode but predominantly he just hits the ball where it’s supposed to go, he just does it very aggressively.
 
A player who hits the ball hard and far does so because of a good technique. Not despite.

Warner and Gilchrist are exhibits A and B.

Brook is pretty correct. So is Head.

Konstas seems able to adjust his game for limited overs cricket. Also keeps his head very still.

All of these contrast with actual sloggers like JFM.

I wouldn't say Warner had the best technique tbh. Averaged only 32.50 outside Australia which isnt the best for a Test opening batsman. He also struggled in India and England, his technique wasnt up to it, he averaged 26.48 in England and averaged 21.78 in India. Warner was best suited on roads in Australia. Outside Australia his technique was tested and he didn't do so well and his record reflect this.

Apart from South Africa and Bangladesh (Bangladesh aren't strong) where he got 5 hundreds combined there....he only got 1 other Test hundred outside Australia - UAE.

It's what makes him in my opinion be a "only a good" Test batsman. He simply needed to be better outside the comforts of Australia.
 
Last edited:
Only for series in the subcontinent like SL/India where getting him early against the newer ball before the spinners come on.

Outside of those series then I completely agree about leaving him at 5.

In the subcontinent the spinners will be bowling in the first 10 overs anyway. No need to move him.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Its actually the reverse Konstas.

gulf in class from Bumrah to the BBL means he has more time, so he should be scoring runs
Does that apply in reverse…… hope not for Konstas’ sake.

Bit of pressure on the selectors now, since the selection decision he’s made a duck and McSweeney gets a MOTM.
 
I highly doubt Konstas was selected off that BBL game

It was the Aus A century combined with McSweeney failing


Seems a pretty clear choice, both will get a couple games, whichever performs best will get the Sri Lanka games

The difference being the pitches that Konstas get to play on vs those McSweeney copped
 
Uzzie should be gone, both of them should be in the side.
Opening with McSweeny and Konstas would be madness.

I don't hate the Konstas selection, though I expect him to have his struggles and be dropped at least once before cementing his spot in the side, if he is indeed good enough. There's clearly been a lack of players in the 25-30 age group really putting their hands up so we may need to skip a generation and pick the likes of Konstas and Connolly in the near future and hope that trial by fire works for some of them.
 
Opening with McSweeny and Konstas would be madness.

I don't hate the Konstas selection, though I expect him to have his struggles and be dropped at least once before cementing his spot in the side, if he is indeed good enough. There's clearly been a lack of players in the 25-30 age group really putting their hands up so we may need to skip a generation and pick the likes of Konstas and Connolly in the near future and hope that trial by fire works for some of them.

Agree we might need to. Connoly has had an impressive start to his career.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

3rd Test Border Gavaskar Trophy December 14-18 1050hrs @ The Gabba

Back
Top