AFL 2017 - R19 Carlton v Geelong Cats 19:25 AEST - Etihad Stadium

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

"Pile driver", jesus christ. Do you lynch mob members read the drivel you post?

A strong tackler taking down a tall player and correctly pinning the arms. Shame it hurt Kreuzer.
To be fair cats fans and vicco media questioned Sloane when he injured Blicavs last week accidentally. I have only seen the replay of the Dangerfield tackle and there seems to be more in that than Sloane on Blicavs and with Dangerfield being a shoe in for the Brownlow if he doesn't get rubbed out it is worthy of generating some discussion. Any one who can't see that is delusional.
 
Cheats hold, throw, shrug shoulders, duck, shocking excuse for a football side is Geelong

Would it better if we did it with some brown paper bags... you know..make you feel more at home? :D

GO Catters
 
I like how all these "neutrals" want to castrate Danger over a hard tackle when the player had the ball that will result in concussion yet totally ignored Sloans off the ball illegal tackle that broke Blicavs leg and will have him out for up to 2 months...
 
I like how all these "neutrals" want to castrate Danger over a hard tackle when the player had the ball that will result in concussion yet totally ignored Sloans off the ball illegal tackle that broke Blicavs leg and will have him out for up to 2 months...
The ball was long gone and he dumped him in to the ground resulting in concussion. Probably deserves a week imo. Doubt he will get more than a fine though. Geelong special privilidges and all that. I'm sure if he was playing for a different club you would agree.
 
The ball was long gone and he dumped him in to the ground resulting in concussion. Probably deserves a week imo. Doubt he will get more than a fine though. Geelong special privilidges and all that. I'm sure if he was playing for a different club you would agree.

No I wouldn't.
One motion, shoulder first, couldn't see the ball.
Again if you want to take the fact he was concussed due to it why wasn't Sloan sighted? Blicavs didn't have the ball and now has a broken leg....
 
No I wouldn't.
One motion, shoulder first, couldn't see the ball.
Again if you want to take the fact he was concussed due to it why wasn't Sloan sighted? Blicavs didn't have the ball and now has a broken leg....
There was commentary around the Sloane "incident". There's commentary around this incident. Sloanes did look more like an accident to my eye, where Dangerfield appeared to drive Kreuzer into the ground which under normal circumstances (ie: not a Brownlow favourite) would result in at least a week suspension if the player is concussed.
 
There was commentary around the Sloane "incident". There's commentary around this incident. Sloanes did look more like an accident to my eye, where Dangerfield appeared to drive Kreuzer into the ground which under normal circumstances (ie: not a Brownlow favourite) would result in at least a week suspension if the player is concussed.

Shows the bias between supporters of clubs, I see Dangers as accidental and Sloans as a bit malicious.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

To be fair cats fans and vicco media questioned Sloane when he injured Blicavs last week accidentally.

Hehe... yeah accidently jumped on him and wrapped his legs around his nowhere near the ball. Weirdest tackle I've ever seen. I think you're the delusional one.

under normal circumstances (ie: not a Brownlow favourite) would result in at least a week suspension if the player is concussed.

Explain Burgoyne's and Mumford's tackles then? You can't I bet.
 
Hehe... yeah accidently jumped on him and wrapped his legs around his nowhere near the ball. Weirdest tackle I've ever seen. I think you're the delusional one.
Blicavs wanted to test out sloanes concussion and was looking to clean Sloane up, Sloane saw it coming and Blicavs got what he deserved. Won't be playing til next year will he? :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL 2017 - R19 Carlton v Geelong Cats 19:25 AEST - Etihad Stadium

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top