I thought he was ok for a lot of the game actuallyYep like Petracca when the big game comes against a good team he goes to water
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought he was ok for a lot of the game actuallyYep like Petracca when the big game comes against a good team he goes to water
Just calling it as I see it, and many agree, and many won't. As I said however, I have no issue with Dangerfield or the decision. I just have an issue with the rule.How do you know he had no intention of competing in the ruck?
Doctor Gero Daz made a funny!!doubt anyone would sober...
HAHAHAHAHAHAAH
Go Catters
The winning Cats culture?
YESSSSSSS!!!!!
SUCK ON THAT GEELONG!!!!!!!
Didnt get to watch the game. Can someone sum it up in a couple of word's
The last 30secs of this match back in 2013 says otherwise.
If anything our last passage of play tonight reminded me of that brilliant passage of play by Brisbane that night!
Tonight gives me an excuses to post it! Perfection!
FFSNo - the whining Cats culture that has been a large part of them winning **** all despite loading up on Danger and Ablett and unearthing gems like Stewart, Kelly and Henry.
Hopefully you'll sack your Coach, ditch Selwood and Ablett, and give these young guns a fresh culture to develop of their own, free of the sooking mantra that's infected your club since 2012.
But maybe you're happy being par with Hawthorn who have come off 3 flags and a list turnover and yet are still par with you at this stage of the season?
Angus Brayshaw could really use your mindreading skills right now.
How can anyone have any complaint about that free?
You Choked...
He continually pushes up into Brayshaw's back and draws attention to it, struggle to see how that is a block, and he does it with the aim of milking a free, had no intention of contesting as a ruck imo.
You don't have to agree.
Came out of nowhere? It was discussed ad nauseum for over a year before change instituted.Seriously, I never heard anyone call for a rule against 3rd man up. It came out of nowhere. Would be interested to be proved wrong.
Blics has done well as defender this year.
I don't have a complaint about that free but I do agree that Danger never had any real intention of competing in the ruck, it was just smart play by him.
Came out of nowhere? It was discussed ad nauseum for over a year before change instituted.
Interesting opinion. The rule is the rule and it was clearly broken by Brayshaw. Conversation about feigning seems ridiculous; he went to move to ruck, Brayshaw blocked him and he was smart enough to know the situation and appeal for the free kick that was blatantly there. Seems like one guy has pretty good footy iq.Brayshaw never took his eyes off the ball.
Dangerfield initiated the contact by pushing hard up against his back and elbow as I saw it.
Players engage in contact at every ruck contest.
The difference here was Danger nominated as ruck in order to feign blockage as a ruck.
He exploited the rule.
Clever. Unsportsmanlike.
On here? Only been on here for about three months to try to give myself an outlet instead of punching walls (ha) but if you are taking all your football information and conversation from here, you are missing some important discussion (you may have noticed, it can be a little extreme in here and not exactly the overall consensus)Show me the thread
FFS
You guys have made whining an art form.
Doesnt your coach have a weekly whine coffee session with the AFL CEO to complain about free kicks against poor Hawthorn?
If you can't see the sickness within your own club then you deserve the club the you support.
Does he? Doesn’t have a single hitout to his name this yearThat would be a pretty big risk to take from Dangerfield. If an opponent doesn't seek you out to block your path, as Brayshaw did, it's an uncontested hitout for Gawn and probably an immediate rebound from the defensive 50 for Melbourne.
Dangerfield nominates for the ruck contest numerous times every game. There's no way Melbourne wouldn't have been aware that it happens in games and been prepared for it. He's the nominated ruckman and, I'm sorry, any ruckman would act exactly the same way Dangerfield would in that instance, when they're preparing to go up and an opposition player blocks them illegally.
No question it's a shithouse rule and it should either be removed or significantly refined (e.g teams have two regular ruckmen before the game and if anyone else in the team nominates as ruckman at a given ball up, the umpire makes sure it is absolutely clear), but I don't see much of an issue with the interpretation.
I just laugh thinking about the response on here if the shoe was on the other foot and Scott had made the comments that Goodwin did? Or if Melbourne had won whether there would have been much scrutiny on the outrageous non-call for front on contact to Menzel by Jetta in time on in the fourth quarter?
Classic Hawkforce. I can’t understand the Hawks fans hatred of Geelong on here. Sure, we won a lot of games against you in the last eight years or so, but you’ve done okay in that time, beaten us in a key final or two. Although, you may be feeling a little on edge at present, giving your loss to Lions last week (home deck, I believe) and heading into a ‘danger’ game against the Blues today. Best of luck! Watch out for the boy Kripps, seems to be quite a playerIf you can't see the sickness within your own club then you deserve the club the you support.
True. By which, we infer ‘Brayshaw’ was not smart? So why is coach not chatting to his player instead of whingingDoes he? Doesn’t have a single hitout to his name this year
Danger was smart. Knew what he was doing.
Haha, you're a ripper.