Richo has mentioned the holding the ball rule 20 times this half.
Are we now witnessing proof that richo is indeed a broken robot?
Are we now witnessing proof that richo is indeed a broken robot?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join the Sweet FA and sign up for State Of Origin! Rivalry, Banter and New Friends made along the way in Bigfooty’s own AFL-Style simulated game. Everyone Welcome! -- Sweet Football Association - Since 2001 AD
“We’ve a warrant here…”Wonder what was said to Pickett?
Give up clown.“We’ve a warrant here…”
Haha no its not. Perfectly umpired tonight (mostly). If you take the play on and then caught its holding the ball. The way its alway been until recently.HTB is more confusing than ever
The AFL buckled to loud minority of dumb spectator and media opinions thinking they would appeal to them. Now it's backfiring on them hard and making them look unprofessional as ever.That's the exact call that the AFL want.
Put that decision in the video package explaining how the rule is meant to work.
Why do you want players getting the ball, it's so much more appealing to watch tackles getting free kicks for goals goals goals?
[\sarcasm]
That's not even the adjustment that was made. As you said it was always the rule, but umpires were making errors. The confusing thing is the unnecessary change to the no prior decisions. Turned it into a raffle whether it's htb or not.Haha no its not. Perfectly umpired tonight (mostly). If you take the play on and then caught its holding the ball. The way its alway been until recently.
With the points despite 5 goals down.P*SS off Cats