- Apr 19, 2019
- 11,122
- 35,049
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Why don't our players run?
Like we are so stationary it's absurd.
Christ get moving.
Would love to see the GPS numbers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why don't our players run?
Like we are so stationary it's absurd.
Christ get moving.
Which ultimately stemmed from an LDU handball that missed Ziebell, iirc. We had the ball on the half forward flank. But yep, the 50 was garbage.Their 1st was from a garbage 50m penalty which probably hasn’t been paid in the history of tome previously.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
How on earth did I miss Will Phillips getting stuck on Tim English?
Ziebell as the experienced head back there should not have allowed that to happen.
Had blokes scared of the coach, had the best player ever, as well as some of our best players ever. Tough buggers who loved the tough stuff as well as winning the ball. Shinboners.I watched a 98 game on Fox a bit back.
Our players ran hard both ways, almost always put body on the line, chased hard even if gassed, and dead set every contest was important even though we in front as players wanted it.
What's happened?
Pittard
Polec
Hall
I can see what they are trying to do and I'm on board with it.This part sounds to me an awful lot like Brad Scott ~2010 rhetoric, when we moved away from late-Laidley-era "hold the ball in the air to slow play down" tactics, and as a result got routinely comfortably beaten by the top sides: 'we're sticking to this approach because we want to build a gameplan and play the way we want to play, we don't just want to beat the best, we want to be the best', and so on. For all the good it led to, we never really shook our inability to halt opposition momentum, and it remained a habit that we started fast and faded late in games. Now maybe you can argue that the approach was sound, and our failure to address these inherent deficiencies of a more open and attacking style is a separate issue - all the same, I don't think it's unreasonable not to be convinced by such a loose method of play that looks great when it comes off but exposes us badly whenever it doesn't, especially not with that same issue from the Scott era in such recent memory.
I would argue the only momentum to a performance like that is backwards; as I've said elsewhere on here, it's obvious how drained of confidence the players are becoming already, drawbacks like that don't just disappear.
I don't see how being definite about the competition as a whole being cyclical ("can, and will, turn") invokes any agency on our part. I get that the letter is going for staunchness, and confidence in the long-term process, but what it effectively says is that showings like Friday's are acceptable - "frustrating", but acceptable - and that invites the question, what wouldn't be okay? What's more than merely "frustrating" to "some of our people"? What standards are we setting that ensure this "difficult path" is actually taking us where we want to be? So when all the letter offers on that front is the uncontrollable notion that all this "goes through cycles" (i.e., downswings like this are inevitable and can't be helped, but hey, there'll be an upswing eventually too because it all goes around in the end...), it's very difficult to take any confidence that the people overseeing matters at the club right now have the necessary active mindset to navigate something like this, rather than talking like they have no say in what befalls us beyond whether we stay on a particular path or not. Standards are set early in these processes, and right now we seem desperate not to have any.
Had blokes scared of the coach, had the best player ever, as well as some of our best players ever. Tough buggers who loved the tough stuff as well as winning the ball. Shinboners.
I don't think they were scared of the coach. I think they were scared of letting him (and themselves) down and scared of losing his respect.Had blokes scared of the coach, had the best player ever, as well as some of our best players ever. Tough buggers who loved the tough stuff as well as winning the ball. Shinboners.
He's not really an experienced backman tho is he?How on earth did I miss Will Phillips getting stuck on Tim English?
Ziebell as the experienced head back there should not have allowed that to happen.
Add in - the talent diluted at the same time the talent went from footballers to athletic footballers to athletes who play football. Coaches were taskmasters instead of mates and the team was genuinely punished if they played shit, not backed in and nurtured.Had blokes scared of the coach, had the best player ever, as well as some of our best players ever. Tough buggers who loved the tough stuff as well as winning the ball. Shinboners.
23 years?I watched a 98 game on Fox a bit back.
Our players ran hard both ways, almost always put body on the line, chased hard even if gassed, and dead set every contest was important even though we in front as players wanted it.
What's happened?
Geez I had high hopes of Hrovat becoming the next Leigh Adams - 20 possies and 3 goals playing the HFF role. Got that one wrong. As I did with EVW. And maybe Will Walker who I had pinned as Brett Burton styled winger/half forward. This is getting depressing....Now we have Mahony so Hrovat spirit lives on.
Quite frankly we've ended up with bizarre, and horrendous, matchups on occasions for years now; possibly it's something to do with how we set up and roll over. It happens to a lot of teams I suppose, but it's rare you get an example as glaring as that.He's not really an experienced backman tho is he?
He's not really an experienced backman tho is he?
I and dare say most of this Board have no recollection of the year you are talking about and as for watching any games from that year I would rather shave my head and walk up LaTrobe Street in a * jumperI'd have that team over this group.
No shit? You'd go for the team that had won a premiership, would play in the grandfinal that year, and win their second flag the next year?I'd have that team over this group.
No sh*t? You'd go for the team that had won a premiership, would play in the grandfinal that year, and win their second flag the next year?
No sh*t? You'd go for the team that had won a premiership, would play in the grandfinal that year, and win their second flag the next year?
No sh*t? You'd go for the team that had won a premiership, would play in the grandfinal that year, and win their second flag the next year?
Never that dominant?I was commenting on how they played and attitude, not results.
We were never that dominant in the 90s. Lost plenty of games despite a great period.
However this team is farcical in comparison and it's simply not North Melbourne.