I was expecting similar when I checked
They had 13 inside 50s in the first quarter & seemed very efficient when going forward
They had 18 in the second quarter, but didn't have that same efficiency - the ball just seemed to live in that area though, so maybe that's why it felt like it could have been a lot more
The 3rd quarter it was 14, and then 15 in the last
So it's interesting that the first quarter was their lowest inside 50 tally, but ended up their highest scoring quarter - maybe we became better at limiting the ease of them moving the ball forward so the entries weren't as clean, versus simply limiting the entries
One I50 from a centre bounce can be worth more 5 repeat I50 wide against a set defence. If only their was some expected score based off I50 to compliment the one focused on conversion.