- Jan 19, 2014
- 7,955
- 13,122
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Michael please.Couch your terms all you like but it's obvious you have a set against Smith for whatever reason. You are now blaming him for the decisions of others. Do you honestly think his teammates (some of who he lives with) or coaches wouldn't know if he was unwell? Do you honestly think this isn't something that happens weekly?
Usually players who play through illness or injury get lauded (Michael Jordan's flu game as one of the most prominent examples) instead you want to blame a 20 year old for playing through an illness when you don't even know what he had.
Your "just asking questions " routine is tiresome and not fooling anyone.
Whether you like or not, his team mates will be asking themselves whether they can trust him. Possibly his coach too. And whether it's disclosure or judgement, the result is effectively the same. He didn't perform in a match that mattered and it subsequently comes out that he was unwell before the game. So how does he get on the field? Player disclosure or medical staff? He wanted to play is the best explanation we have thus far. I admire Bevo's protection of his players.
Bevo or any of Bailey's co-workers are not going to say. But, this a problem. The one thing you have to be able to do in these endeavours (and the Pies game was an endeavour of some magnitude) is to be able to trust your team mates. Judgement or disclosure. Lose trust in it, and it's very hard to get it back.
Incidentally, Bailey is 22 years old. This goes to research and this information is freely available on the web. I broached the subjects of reactions (Frankl), research and independent thought on a different thread, Admittedly, reactions was the only one I addressed with a teasing quote from Frankl. The subject of research was next on my hit list. If you'd like tune in when I get around to it there is a follow me facility on BF I believe.
Last edited: