Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Burgo is going fineDoubtful. I'm probably the most cynical bastard on this forum and I'm not turning on Burgo.
1.5 says our disposal is abhorrent, which is why we slow the game down.1.5 says we werent being belted
Classic 1970.He does this when he can’t mount a reasonable argument to support his belief. One issue is he’s a massive Sloane fan and he can’t mount any counter-arguments, so does what he’s doing abs then accuses others. He’s done this a lot.
You wouldn't even be top 10 lol.Doubtful. I'm probably the most cynical bastard on this forum and I'm not turning on Burgo.
Therefore why slow the game down? Get back to allowing the players to play their natural instinctive football, can't be any worse than against the Pies.1.5 says our disposal is abhorrent, which is why we slow the game down.
It wouldn't be a bad idea if he playsAlso not enough experience in the forward line...but we wouldn't put Sloane up there would we!
Other than Cox and Perkins, I reckon he's played more games than the rest of the top 10 picks put together. (JUH, Philips, McDonald, Campbell, DGB, Hollands, Reid)
There's nothing wrong with dropping a player if he's not getting a kick, especially if it's not beneficial to his development. Perhaps we have learnt from Chayce Jones.
I agree.Therefore why slow the game down? Get back to allowing the players to play their natural instinctive football, can't be any worse than against the Pies.
Therefore why slow the game down? Get back to allowing the players to play their natural instinctive football, can't be any worse than against the Pies.
Easy to say in hindsight, but you need to think we were all in and so close to that flag we have all been dreaming about for the last 20 years.
Sloane would have had other bigger offers from Vic clubs (probably the Roos), he was the vice captain, one of our best players and we'd just lost Dangerfield, picked up Gibbs, so if it comes down to 4 v 5 years, you throw the 5th year on there and worry about it later, hopefully with a premiership cup.
How do you think the Tigers 7 year deal for Martin is looking now? The last year or 2 of a long year deal is always too many, but clubs do that so they can secure the player for the first few years.
Grundy, Coniglio, Martin, Franklin, Daniher (oh wait, that was only a 3 year deal right, not 5), Fyfe...all these guys will be struggling to make the team in their last year, but they'll all be picked.
Slow ball movement in theory means you're less chance of giving it away.Exactly, why go to a high possession game when your disposal isn't that good.
It was prior to rd 17 and sure we weren't going to make it.This was near the end of the 2018 season and we weren’t likely to make finals that year. We had done our dash.
Any deal greater than 4 years is just nuts without certain trigger clauses protecting both parties.
It’s a stupid game plan if you can’t kick. Not only do you turn it over, but if you get it forward the opposition have clogged up your forward line.Slow ball movement in theory means you're less chance of giving it away.
Our skills are that bad we can't even manage that.
Plus our tall forward setup even with RT just weren't providing moving targets when we did move it quick.
Also, it's not a premiership winning formula.It’s a stupid game plan if you can’t kick. Not only do you turn it over, by the time you get it forward the opposition have clogged up your forward line.
It's possible it could work, but you've gotta do it very, very well.Also, it's not a premiership winning formula.
If we are going to lose, would prefer to do it with a game plan that should be successful in the future.
Our forwards don't move at the best of times, not the tall ones anyway.It’s a stupid game plan if you can’t kick. Not only do you turn it over, but if you get it forward the opposition have clogged up your forward line.
Not imo, with the direction thr game is going.It's possible it could work, but you've gotta do it very, very well.
Slow ball movement in theory means you're less chance of giving it away.
Our skills are that bad we can't even manage that.
Plus our tall forward setup even with RT just weren't providing moving targets when we did move it quick.
I guess you’d be down on confidence being dropped after 1 game, where a lot played poorly.
Maybe they meant his confidence in the teams skills and game plan was down?Wasn’t he supposed to have come back from the off season in ripping nick? One of the stars of the track who was flying
Where did the confidence go?
Maybe they meant his confidence in the teams skills and game plan was down?
“Go on son go and get some confidence back without crouch and sloane waiting for day break to kick it to ya”As it should be
We do not and never will have Hawthorns premiership winning skill leve.It's possible it could work, but you've gotta do it very, very well.
I'd take Toby Greene in a heartbeat. He's a jet every 6 weeks between suspensions.Toby Greene
The best fitness guy is worthless if you don't have the talent on your list to begin with.Burgo is going fine
We're running around like headless chooks just as frantically at the end of games as we are at the start