Opinion Changes vs. Geelong (The Battle For 2nd)

Remove this Banner Ad

Not sure what game you were watching today. C.Pearce was awesome tagging Wells completely out of the game. Suban was really good as well. Kicked two and helped set up two others. Barlow's tweet doesnt fill me with confidence. Mundy for Barlow, pav for tab's and perhaps michie for crozier as a sub is my tip.

Good to have you back on BF sherrif :thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

WANTED
New Big Footy member for Fremantle Board

Due to a recent retirement from our board due to PTBFSD, a place has opened up for a new member having the required attributes:

  • a good knowledge of AFL and the Fremantle Football Club and it's history.
  • an excellent knowledge of the current Fremantle playing list and potential future listings
  • a dedicated member of the Fremantle BF team of posters
  • needs to contribute at least every third post on some many threads
  • needs to be able to maintain arguments concommitantly with at least 14 other Fremantle BF posters at any one time and maintain a high level of rage
  • unable to admit when a wrong statement has been made and prepared to even attack made up avatars when useful arguments run out
  • Must have last word in every argument
  • can move to personal attacks when can't sway other posters to their way of thinking
  • an ego that sits somewhere between "very healthy" and "sociopath"
  • able to attack the head of our Vic cheersquad after all the effort put in week after week
  • doesn't appreciate Moo's sense of humour
Please send all applications to my porcelin mailbox preferably in really soft three ply paper and I'll pass an eye over them. Please assume that any lack of return response means that either my mailbox is full and I will get to your application soon, or the position has been filled by the retiree who already misses us deeply.
Brilliant.
 
Stevie J cited.

Steve Johnson, Geelong Cats, has been charged with a Level Two Engaging in Rough Conduct Offence (225 demerit points, two-match sanction) for engaging in rough conduct against Pearce Hanley, Brisbane Lions, during the first quarter of the Round 13 match between the Geelong Cats and the Brisbane Lions, played at the Gabba on Sunday June 23, 2013.

In summary, due to his previous poor record, his two-game sanction must remain at two games, even with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Brisbane Lions Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has 54.04 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 279.04 points and a two-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 209.28 points and a two-match sanction.
nothing re: harvey or crowley/duff
 
Back to the discussion about changes.

In
Mundy, Pavlich - We smashed North and have two A graders to come back in.

Out
Barlow (If injured), Taberner\Hannath

Can Taberner ruck? If not, then he will have to come out for Pavlich.

If Barlow is fit, then someone else will need to be squeezed out. Maybe Crozier although I thought he played well.

The week after, Sandi in for Hannath and playing at least 50% forward or Sandi in the ruck while Clarke plays on a wing.
 
In:
Mundy & Pav (if fit)

Fingers crossed for Barlow, however I think we'll err on the side of caution.

Outs:
Barlow & Hannath/Taberner

Crozier holds his spot up forward, throw De Boer into the middle to play the extractor role. He'll relish the opportunity.


If for some reason, Barra doesn't pull up, it's time for Viv to debut. The best clearance player we have waiting in the wings.
 
Stevie J cited.


nothing re: harvey or crowley/duff



But did you notice there was a strange opening sentence to the report. Hope it doesn't involve Crowley

The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has reviewed the weekend’s matches. Please note that the one matter from the weekend’s games remains outstanding at this time
 
But did you notice there was a strange opening sentence to the report. Hope it doesn't involve Crowley

The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has reviewed the weekend’s matches. Please note that the one matter from the weekend’s games remains outstanding at this time

Hope all is well for Crowls as I would think he would do the job on Bartell or Selwood.
 
WANTED
New Big Footy member for Fremantle Board

Due to a recent retirement from our board due to PTBFSD, a place has opened up for a new member having the required attributes:

  • a good knowledge of AFL and the Fremantle Football Club and it's history.
  • an excellent knowledge of the current Fremantle playing list and potential future listings
  • a dedicated member of the Fremantle BF team of posters
  • needs to contribute at least every third post on some many threads
  • needs to be able to maintain arguments concommitantly with at least 14 other Fremantle BF posters at any one time and maintain a high level of rage
  • unable to admit when a wrong statement has been made and prepared to even attack made up avatars when useful arguments run out
  • Must have last word in every argument
  • can move to personal attacks when can't sway other posters to their way of thinking
  • an ego that sits somewhere between "very healthy" and "sociopath"
  • able to attack the head of our Vic cheersquad after all the effort put in week after week
  • doesn't appreciate Moo's sense of humour
Please send all applications to my porcelin mailbox preferably in really soft three ply paper and I'll pass an eye over them. Please assume that any lack of return response means that either my mailbox is full and I will get to your application soon, or the position has been filled by the retiree who already misses us deeply.
yep. good riddance to anyone who thinks contributing means dragging everything into pointless arguments and petty insults.
 
But did you notice there was a strange opening sentence to the report. Hope it doesn't involve Crowley

The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has reviewed the weekend’s matches. Please note that the one matter from the weekend’s games remains outstanding at this time

any word on Clarke & Petrie?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

But did you notice there was a strange opening sentence to the report. Hope it doesn't involve Crowley

The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has reviewed the weekend’s matches. Please note that the one matter from the weekend’s games remains outstanding at this time

Kneesy Embley ?.
 
No better thread than this for me to check out from BF.

Good luck guys and gals.

Won't be back.

Let the muppets rule.

And seppo, f**k me, has a bigger attention whore ever been born?

Posting in a thread just to say you aren't going to participate in it, and calling someone an attention whore at the same time probably not the best of decisions.
 
Crowley is cited - for pinching! $900 sanction.

AFL@AFL
9m
MRP investigation has laid one more charge from Round 13. Ryan Crowley pinching Brent Harvey. Can accept $900 sanction.
 
Stevie J cited.


nothing re: harvey or crowley/duff

Pity SJ can't get a reduction with an early plea, means that he will almost certainly challenge and I think might have a shot at getting off all together. The only thing he's gpt to lose is a few extra carry over points. With the early plea discount he'd be tempted to just take the one week.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Changes vs. Geelong (The Battle For 2nd)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top