List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Starting to become really concerned he’s a higher priced Chesser. We need blokes that can get there hands on the ball.

Jagga, Reid, Draper, Langford and Smillie are all ball pigs, must be all better suited to our needs at this stage.
Absolutely valid point with the moderate possession count but all those players also come with their pitfalls. Glad half full there’s at least 3 players most of us would be happy with at 3 if we still have it.

We do need an accumulator and as much as I hate to admit it from a list balance point of view you’re probably right. If we were going to take that approach I’d pick Jagga but also mindful that we don’t need to (can’t) fill every list need in one draft.
 
The good thing is FOS isnt going to slide to pick 3.I wouldn't want him at pick 1 if we had pick 1 too big risk. But at 3 it's a different story.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sam Frost out for the rest of the season with foot stress fracture. Horrible for him but will probably expose Hawthorn defensively and drive up Barrass price.
 
Woweee it's happening we arrive going to get a first round pick and future first for TB. Frosty is out lol.

It's all happening fella. With frost out Dixon going to run riot which means TB future first is coming. Pop the bottles
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Woweee it's happening we arrive going to get a first round pick and future first for TB. Frosty is out lol.

It's all happening fella. With frost out Dixon going to run riot which means TB future first is coming. Pop the bottles
Dixon isn't capable of running riot. I don't think he's capable of running full stop.
 
So for those who think bringing 3 to the table is bending over

Look at the possible deal as it could be

3 + 15 (via Hawks for Barras and they beat Port then lose)
for
Baker + 6 (via Suns for Rioli) + 9 (via Freo for Bolton)

At 6 we have two options out of the following 7
Smith, FOS, Draper, Smillie, Langford, Murphy, Lalor (may be more if Armstrong or Trainor taken prior)

At 9 we have one of Travaglia or Lindsay or Berry or perhaps one of the 7 mentioned above

We still keep 23 and whatever sweetener Hawks offer plus all our futures unless it is Hawks F1 with our F2 going back

Stop pissing your pants and over reacting.
 
Last edited:
So for those who think bringing 3 to the table is bending over

Look at the who deal as it could be

3 + 15 (via Hawks for Barras and they beat Port then lose)
for
Baker + 6 (via Suns for Rioli) + 9 (via Freo for Bolton)

At 6 we have two options out of the following 7
Smith, FOS, Draper, Smillie, Langford, Murphy, Lalor (may be more if Armstrong or Trainor taken prior)

At 9 we have one of Travaglia or Lindsay or Berry or perhaps one of the 7 mentioned above

We still keep 23 and whatever sweetener Hawks offer plus all our futures unless it is Hawks F1 with our F2 going back

Stop pissing your pants and over reacting.

I mean, that’d be amazing but Richmond wouldn’t do that. I don’t even think they’d do 3 for Baker and 6. I think if a deal like that gets done it’ll be 3 for 9 or 10 and Baker which is disgusting for us.
 
So for those who think bringing 3 to the table is bending over

Look at the who deal as it could be

3 + 15 (via Hawks for Barras and they beat Port then lose)
for
Baker + 6 (via Suns for Rioli) + 9 (via Freo for Bolton)

At 6 we have two options out of the following 7
Smith, FOS, Draper, Smillie, Langford, Murphy, Lalor (may be more if Armstrong or Trainor taken prior)

At 9 we have one of Travaglia or Lindsay or Berry or perhaps one of the 7 mentioned above

We still keep 23 and whatever sweetener Hawks offer plus all our futures unless it is Hawks F1 with our F2 going back

Stop pissing your pants and over reacting.
FOS , Draiper , smillie, Langford all gone by 6 Lalor probably goes to Melbourne at 5 too .



Recon at 6 we may be stuck drafting Reid who is a flight risk or jagga

If I was west coast I would refuse to trade pick 3 for anything

We need top end talent not the best of the rest
 
Stop pissing your pants and over reacting.
Discover No Way GIF by ADWEEK
 
So for those who think bringing 3 to the table is bending over

Look at the who deal as it could be

3 + 15 (via Hawks for Barras and they beat Port then lose)
for
Baker + 6 (via Suns for Rioli) + 9 (via Freo for Bolton)

At 6 we have two options out of the following 7
Smith, FOS, Draper, Smillie, Langford, Murphy, Lalor (may be more if Armstrong or Trainor taken prior)

At 9 we have one of Travaglia or Lindsay or Berry or perhaps one of the 7 mentioned above

We still keep 23 and whatever sweetener Hawks offer plus all our futures unless it is Hawks F1 with our F2 going back

Stop pissing your pants and over reacting.

I don't see the upside here for the Tiers. They upgrade their first pick by a few spots in what many consider a pretty even group at the top only to have another pick slide by what could be come draft night 8-9 spots AND they give up a player they are hoping to get a later first rounder as well?

I'd do that deal, i think we all would but there's no way the Tigers do.


I am however resigned to the fact we will be trading pick 3, after hearing Pyke admit it's a possibility publicly, he's basically preparing the supporter group for the outcome.
 
FOS , Draiper , smillie, Langford all gone by 6 Lalor probably goes to Melbourne at 5 too .



Recon at 6 we may be stuck drafting Reid who is a flight risk or jagga

If I was west coast I would refuse to trade pick 3 for anything

We need top end talent not the best of the rest

I'd be shocked if Jagga is there at 6
 
I can't say much but and it may not happen but a lot of work has gone into making sure pick 3 is used on a much higher caliber player than Baker.

The clubs has quite a few trade targets. Hopefully get a couple over the line but still want 2 picks inside the top 20 of the draft.
Phil you god damn tease.
If we are talking Chad then I’m as hard as a diamond in an ice storm.
Even Kozzy has me at half-mast.
We need this…
All the Baker and Graham talk is a real boner-killer
 
I don't see the upside here for the Tiers. They upgrade their first pick by a few spots in what most consider a pretty even group at the top only to have another pick slide by what could be come draft night 6-7 spots AND give up a player they are hoping to get a later first rounder for?

I'd do that deal, i think we all would but there's no way the Tigers do.
As we get closer to the draft it’s best to think of it in terms of players rather than numbers. I believe the Tigers are pretty keen to pair Jagga and FOS if possible. At 15 they’d still get their preferred Whitlock.

So possibly Smillie, Travaglia and Baker for FOS and JWhitlock. Don’t think it looks shocking, really just going to be dependent on who the tigers are targeting and where they are likely to be picked. The other consideration is that the tigers will not be able to use all their picks so they might be inclined to overpay to move up the draft order or trade into next year.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top