List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Latest news and rumours

Done deals:



  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted


Ongoing discussions:




  • List Manager Matt Clarke appeared on Sept 11 Gettable - Click spoiler below for summary
    On the draft: "We predicted that the draft was strong, but it's probably gotten stronger during the year."

    On top end of draft: "You could probably make five or six different choices and get it right."

    On Pick 3: "I reckon there's five (players) around that mark."

    On splitting: "I think you want to hold an early selection if you can. The depth of this group allows you to maybe have some movement there, and see what you can do to bring in more talent in the first 20-25 picks. Easier said than done, and I think most clubs would be saying the same thing. We'll see what we can do."

    On Liam Baker: "He's still yet to make a decision. They're still weighing up a few things. We'd love to get Liam on board from what he offers from a talent and leadership point of view. We understand where we're at as a group, we're rebuilding our group, we need to add some guys in the middle tier to support our young group."

    On Jack Graham: "We've got a number of players that we're speaking to. A bit of a wait and see on that one as well. We'll talk to a number of guys."

    On Shai Bolton: "I think it will be difficult for anybody, really. He's heavily contracted and a high quality player."

    On James Peatling: "He's heavily involved in a finals series at the moment so I don't want to comment too much on it, but I think there's a number of guys that have been playing really good footy this year that could suit what we do and what other clubs do. He's taken his footy to another level this year."

    On Tom Barrass: "We've had an early discussion with Hawthorn about it, they understand where we're at. He's nominated Hawthorn as his ideal destination. We want what we think he's worth, as a genuine key back in the competition that can do what he can do. We're obviously mindful of getting an appropriate deal for West Coast."

    On Tom Clurey: "Maybe (note: sounded very non enthused). We'd probably need some key back depth, whether that's through the draft or trade and free agency."

    On Jack Darling: "We've had initial discussions with his management group about (moving). We're open to talking, as we are with all of our players, but Jack's contracted with us."

    On Liam Ryan: "I expect him to be at West Coast next year, yes." (The most definitive answer of the day by a mile, a non-starter of a talking point.)

    On out of contact players e.g. Rotham, Witherden, Jones: "We're still working through what it looks like from a list point of view, and how many selections we'll want to have, and players that may come in and potentially may go out. You might want to give a coach an opportunity to look at these guys."

    On Harley Reid: "We've had discussions most of the year with his management group. I think it sits in a really good place. We're open to doing really whatever they want to do to be honest. We're really confident in building the right system around Harley, on and off field, to make sure that he's really comfortable, that he's going to play his best footy, and his long term future."

    On Jake Waterman's new deal: "Yep, really close. We're working really closely with his management on that. I expect that we'll have something done pretty soon."

    On Oscar Allen: "We've been talking with Oscar and his manager most of the year on that one. We're going through some stuff at the moment. I think we'll be ok with that one."



Past rumoured targets:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s not really that much more, if any, than their previous offer though is it!!?

F1 + F2 = 14 (ok we get the choice, but splitting hairs).

Previous offer was 14 + F2 for our F3

If they are now adding a late future pick it’s probably F4, which would about equate to the F2 to F3 downgrade previously suggested.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
f4 has no points attached, so not really worth much to us at all
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It’s not really that much more, if any, than their previous offer though is it!!?

F1 + F2 = 14 (ok we get the choice, but splitting hairs).

Previous offer was 14 + F2 for our F3

If they are now adding a late future pick it’s probably F4, which would about equate to the F2 to F3 downgrade previously suggested.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

But it's heading in the right direction

Which means the opposite of them cooling on him
 
Need Ross lyon on the blower to TB.

Barrass 23 to saints for 7 8 .....**** the Hawks.

8 to tigers for 18 and baker F4

Tigers F4 for Dev.

Turns it into.....Barrass 23 into 7 18 baker dev


2024
3 FOS
7 TT
18 ?
Champion

Graham, baker, Dev


2025 all F picks.

On Pixel 6 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

"The new talks would also ensure West Coast wouldn’t need to rely on trading Barrass before it can acquire Baker.

It’s believed Hawthorn’s latest offer for Barrass is a future first-round pick and a second rounder (either tied to Hawthorn or Carlton), with a future later pick also going back to West Coast."

Don't know if this means Hawks have upped their offer or it's a misprint and meant to say "back from WC")
Sounds like they’ve downgraded the offer or increased it by $5. Clowns.
 
Our board is trying to work out how we are getting involved. It will either involve one of 7 and 8 (not both) and a combo of first rounders (our future first etc.). It could also be we are giving something to Richmond to help you guys get the Baker deal done.
We're equally confused mate.
 
Our board is trying to work out how we are getting involved. It will either involve one of 7 and 8 (not both) and a combo of first rounders (our future first etc.). It could also be we are giving something to Richmond to help you guys get the Baker deal done.
plenty of ways it could happen

Eagles have 3, Saints 7+8, Richmond 6+10+18+baker(worth 15-20), plus everybody has future picks

Im sure your club has incentive to get to pick 3, and Richmond want it to happen because otherwise theyre stuck with Baker who doesnt want to be there
 
Need Ross lyon on the blower to TB.

Barrass 23 to saints for 7 8 .....**** the Hawks.

8 to tigers for 18 and baker F4

Tigers F4 for Dev.

Turns it into.....Barrass 23 into 7 18 baker dev


2024
3 FOS
7 TT
18 ?
Champion

Graham, baker, Dev


2025 all F picks.

On Pixel 6 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
We are focussed on the draft, the only aging players we are interested in are dirt cheap ones sorry.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

With the Hawthorn unders offered for Barrass being rejected, I think it looks like we aren't being a soft touch (at the moment at least).

Hopefully it is a sign that we are not compromising our own draft position in order to keep good relationships like we have in the recent past.
PA and Geelong are ****holes to trade with, but this doesn’t impact their ability to get trades done at all.

Glad to see a bit of a tougher stand by WC. Shows we’re not pushovers/bendovers.
 
It's getting worse. We are going to trade 3 for 8 and a few picks in the 40s or some crap

I think 3 + Hawks f1st for 7 and 8

Then 8 for 15 and 16
Can’t see us losing both picks.

3 + 63 for 8 + 27.

You can split 8 for Baker + Tigers pick?
 
Can’t see us losing both picks.

3 + 63 for 8 + 27.

You can split 8 for Baker + Tigers pick?
That doesnt make any sense from out perspective. Could split 8 with 15+16 from GWS, then use 16 for Baker.
We arent splitting 3 for pick 15+27+Baker. We wouldve just accepted the Carlton offer if this was the case.

Will be a top 10 pick coming our way, as well as Baker
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top