![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/western_bulldogs.png)
- Oct 9, 2013
- 11,507
- 15,937
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 24
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Apologies all for missing the vote yesterday - I was driving 13 hours up north and in my haste to make good time I didn't log on to vote.
Anyway, here now and caught up on the thread so let's kill some evil fkrs hey!
Unlikely sante was intimidated as evil would have assumed he was protected. I daresay some of those pushing the intimidation could be trying to protect swans.
I've checked on sante twice this morning and both times he was seen less than 5 minutes ago. Infact he was last seen 3 minutes ago. And he says he can't post today because he's busy? Please. He's intimidated. I'm not says SSwans isn't evil, but I've got nothing to suggest that he is. Sante imo is 100% intimidated unless he comes on and says he isn't. And I'm sure, given he's finding time to keep up with this thread, he can find the 30 seconds to confirm he's not intimidated, unless he is... which would put more pressure on those continuing to press for SSwansI would have assumed that protection covers all bases, so they might have avoided going for him in any fashion, kill, seer, intimidate.
I'm inclined to believe it for now. SSwans2011 Grand Uncle Horace jmoo wan
I'm voting Cadsky because checking profiles is lame.I've checked on sante twice this morning and both times he was seen less than 5 minutes ago. Infact he was last seen 3 minutes ago. And he says he can't post today because he's busy? Please. He's intimidated. I'm not says SSwans isn't evil, but I've got nothing to suggest that he is. Sante imo is 100% intimidated unless he comes on and says he isn't. And I'm sure, given he's finding time to keep up with this thread, he can find the 30 seconds to confirm he's not intimidated, unless he is... which would put more pressure on those continuing to press for SSwans
Meta gaming by checking profiles is not only lame (and sometimes against the rules), but info gleaned does not really mean all that much.I've checked on sante twice this morning and both times he was seen less than 5 minutes ago. Infact he was last seen 3 minutes ago. And he says he can't post today because he's busy? Please. He's intimidated. I'm not says SSwans isn't evil, but I've got nothing to suggest that he is. Sante imo is 100% intimidated unless he comes on and says he isn't. And I'm sure, given he's finding time to keep up with this thread, he can find the 30 seconds to confirm he's not intimidated, unless he is... which would put more pressure on those continuing to press for SSwans
I've checked on sante twice this morning and both times he was seen less than 5 minutes ago. Infact he was last seen 3 minutes ago. And he says he can't post today because he's busy? Please. He's intimidated. I'm not says SSwans isn't evil, but I've got nothing to suggest that he is. Sante imo is 100% intimidated unless he comes on and says he isn't. And I'm sure, given he's finding time to keep up with this thread, he can find the 30 seconds to confirm he's not intimidated, unless he is... which would put more pressure on those continuing to press for SSwans
Never encountered this before. Just using the information in front on me but will take it on boardMod Note
checking and using activity status is not against the rules but is contrary to the spirit of the game.
Please do not do this or be prepared to face universal derision.
I remember a previous game years ago where someone checked activity and noticed that someone was "in a conversation" as an indication they were evil. Not a good look, meta-ing just ruins games.Never encountered this before. Just using the information in front on me but will take it on board
No arguement here. I just wasn't aware.I remember a previous game years ago where someone checked activity and noticed that someone was "in a conversation" as an indication they were evil. Not a good look, meta-ing just ruins games.
Say what?Well we've got plenty of time to find out if sante is intimidated*
*He is
Three people have pushed back against him being intimidated
BEaston boncer34 por_please_ya
If you're smart you can pull out a "why are you engaged in conversation" post to elicit a few telling melts without ever actually checking.No arguement here. I just wasn't aware.
You never reply when I talk.
I love you boncerYou never reply when I talk.
Thanks for the trapIf you're smart you can pull out a "why are you engaged in conversation" post to elicit a few telling melts without ever actually checking.
well I was going to say you until this very nice response so now I'm going to say Pie 4 LifeHello Gralin
Interested to know who you think has been suspiciously quiet by their own recent standards.
![]()
I agree. Let’s remove his life and make him just Pie 4well I was going to say you until this very nice response so now I'm going to say Pie 4 Life