Review Good vs Melbourne

Remove this Banner Ad

View attachment 1136623

Just look at this dumb campaigner. Ball may not have gone out? Not relevant. Ball was forced over the line by a Melbourne player? Not relevant.

The focus is on a hypothetical situation of what the ball may have done and what the subjective intention was of the second to last person to touch the ball.

These guys are genuine idiots.

By this argument, tackling a player over the line could be deliberate.

Or kicking it down the line, and it deflects off a player and out of bounds could be a free against the kicker.
I would have thought the sufficient intent rule only applies to the player who last touched the ball. In this case Spargo, and Murray’s intent is no longer relevant.
 
Caved to media. That statement is pointless. Everyone agrees he didn’t show intent. The point is it was deflected.

deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
16 points up with 7 minutes left. There's your problem. Enjoy your 2nd loss on Friday champ
 
deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
Lol you lost to last year's wooden spooners
 
I think the media is just a bit shitted off that Crows are well back on track.
Yep and Melbourne are sensitive because deep down they know this is the first sign of the wheels falling off
 
deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.

Might want to hit up a GP bud, your sodium levels are through the roof.
 
deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
all-these-flavors-and-you-chose-to-be-slaty-youre-jealous.gif
 
deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
Deflected- cause (something) to change direction; turn aside from a straight course.....
 
deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
Yeah, ignore all the other bad calls... like Oliver's rugby throw that led to the Petracca goal. We actually had more poor call than the Dèes, just not in the last 5 minutes which the media have concentrated all their efforts ignoring the majority of the game.

Good luck getting within 5 goals of the Bulldogs on Friday night.. .
 
deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.

And what exactly have Melbourne achieved? You ain't Richmond chief!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
You mean gift wrapped by Melbourne's inability to kick straight or take a regulation mark! Imean how did Pickett drop that mark - wow!

The fact you are so sad still makes this whole thing so much better!

Check the scoreboard big fella , Crows get a W.
 
There’s a lot of North Melbourne 2016 in this Melbourne side (or, for the NFL fans, Steelers last season).

Fluked a few wins, and now exposed as a side playing for free kicks.

They’ll win a handful more games this season and be easily bumped out in the first week of finals.
 
There’s a lot of North Melbourne 2016 in this Melbourne side (or, for the NFL fans, Steelers last season).

Fluked a few wins, and now exposed as a side playing for free kicks.

They’ll win a handful more games this season and be easily bumped out in the first week of finals.
Said the same thing after the match, they ain't anything special
 
There’s a lot of North Melbourne 2016 in this Melbourne side (or, for the NFL fans, Steelers last season).

Fluked a few wins, and now exposed as a side playing for free kicks.

They’ll win a handful more games this season and be easily bumped out in the first week of finals.
I reckon Melbourne are better than that. We contained their medium forwards and smalls well (Fritsch, Pickett, Petracca when he was there) which other teams don't.

I think they also saw how important Christian Salem is to their ball movement too. Teams may sit on Salem after seeing them without him.
 
deflected? lol. even on the reply it isnt clear. Even if you get a hot spot on spargos hand and it shows a minimal of grazes undetectable to the human eye it doesn't mean its the right call.
The umpire didnt even see the blatant deliberate handball, yet you expect him to see a miniscule impossible to detect to the human eye 'deflection'.

Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call. So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.
You would have given your left nut to finish 13th the past few decades
 
Have taken screenshots but too large to upload. It’s 8.34 to go in the last quarter.

you can see his fingers part as the ball goes past in the first slow mo they play. they conveniently only show it once and then move on to worse angles...
Cheers. Might have a curious look.
I remember seeing Berry being convinced it was touched.
 
Are there any rules surrounding how goals are reviewed?

"All goals are reviewed" we get told.

Ok

One look at the potentially incriminating angle but cut off the footage at the key moment. Don't revisit. View more distant cameras that are on worse angles.

Quick! Bounce the ball

If it was a Crows goal they'd still be analysing the crystal clear super slow mo high resolution footage that they magically uncovered
Your tinfoil hat needs adjusting.
 
One thing I feel might have been overlooked after the win was the form of Rory.

For the first 3 quarters he was completely invisible. I'm not sure if he was trying to run a defence role (wasn't effective if he did) or if he just couldn't find the ball, but he seemed to really struggle.
His end to the game was great and he was right in the middle of the winning moments.

Thoughts on his game? Was anyone else concerned by the first 3 quarters?
 
Face it. 4 points gift wrapped by biased umps too scared to make the call.

Us after reluctantly accepting the 4 points.



So u guys come 13th instead of 15th. wow.

Feel free to check back in at the end of September if you actually win anything meaningful. Go ahead. Mark it in your diary. We'll be waiting.
 
Unfortunately the cameras aren't good enough to clearly pick it up.


You can watch F1 and see a speck of carbon fibre come off a car. Yet we can't see if a hand touches a Football.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Those slow mo cameras are aimed at those spot.
The ball is moving and the cameras are moving/ panning.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Review Good vs Melbourne

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top