Ins & Outs vs Port Adelaide

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
A contest. Something Laycock is struggling to do.

Maybe not this year, but in years to come yes.

No

I don't expect Bellchambers to be a match winner in his first game.

Let me repeat this.

HE WILL GET SLAUGHTERED.

Sometimes I think you follow the Bendigo Bombers and that Essendon are your second side.

Can we please just think logically and play the best possible line-up.
FOR THE ESSENDON FC.

Not Bendigo.
 
Let me repeat this.

HE WILL GET SLAUGHTERED.

Sometimes I think you follow the Bendigo Bombers and that Essendon are your second side.

Can we please just think logically and play the best possible line-up.
FOR THE ESSENDON FC.

Not Bendigo.

Screw it drop him anyway dont bring in Bellchambers but play Ryder in the ruck atm Laycock shouldn't be in our best 22 based on his form this year.
 
____ it if he already knows then he just isn't up to standard and we should be looking to the future, play Bellchambers either way.

You are just looking for a scapegoat.

We are missing 4 of our best 5 players. Every club in the league will struggle to win a game if they miss key players.

Look at how ordinary players like Embley, Lynch and Hansen are now with Judd and Cousins not playing at West Coast.

Key players missing have a snowballing effect on all the other players in the side.

Why take Laycock out of a side already missing 8 of its best 22 and replace him with a player who is not even performing well against non AFL ruckmen in the feeder competition. I'm sorry, its just gross stupidity.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Screw it drop him anyway dont bring in Bellchambers but play Ryder in the ruck atm Laycock shouldn't be in our best 22 based on his form this year.

With Fletcher out, don't you think Ryder will be needed down back more than ever before.

Think about it. Please.
 
You are just looking for a scapegoat.

We are missing 4 of our best 5 players. Every club in the league will struggle to win a game if they miss key players.

Look at how ordinary players like Embley, Lynch and Hansen are now with Judd and Cousins not playing at West Coast.

Key players missing have a snowballing effect on all the other players in the side.

Why take Laycock out of a side already missing 8 of its best 22 and replace him with a player who is not even performing well against non AFL ruckmen in the feeder competition. I'm sorry, its just gross stupidity.

So your happy rewarding mediocrity? Laycock has been shit all year, hasn't even performed well playing up forward. At least Bellchambers is an unknown commodity, that could be anything.
 
So your happy rewarding mediocrity? Laycock has been shit all year, hasn't even performed well playing up forward. At least Bellchambers is an unknown commodity, that could be anything.

How did Bellchambers go on Saturday against John Meesen, an Adelaide reject who can't currently get a game for the worst side in the competition ?

Now how do you think he will go against Brogan and Lade ?

Hardly an unknown commodity.
 
With Fletcher out, don't you think Ryder will be needed down back more than ever before.

Think about it. Please.

Why the hell would we need many KP defenders against Port? It's not like they have any real Power Forwards apart from Tredrea.

Tredrea/Michael, Westoff/Pears, Motlop/NLM, Ebert/Nash
 
So your happy rewarding mediocrity? Laycock has been shit all year, hasn't even performed well playing up forward. At least Bellchambers is an unknown commodity, that could be anything.

And no, I'm not happy about rewarding mediocrity. However with our dire injury list we have to just deal with it for the moment and hope he can turn his form slump around.

Besides aren't we rewarding mediocrity by giving Bellchambers a game when he has done F**k all for Bendigo.
 
HE WILL GET SLAUGHTERED.

How do you know? Can you tell me who is going to win the 2008 Melbourne Cup? :rolleyes:

Sometimes I think you follow the Bendigo Bombers and that Essendon are your second side.

Like many Essendon supporters I follow Bendigo because of their youngsters.
Sorry if this is a crime. :rolleyes:


Laycock has been under performing, fact. Yes, Bellchambers probably isn't ready to play especially after Sat game. But it would be a great test for him and who knows, he might actually hold his own against Brogan and Lade.

Laycock is getting worse and may just need a run at Bendigo to get a his hands on the footy. We wouldn't be having this conversation if Laycock was performing.

Ok, don't bring Bellchambers in. Play Ryder in the ruck with Hille.
 
Why the hell would we need many KP defenders against Port? It's not like they have any real Power Forwards apart from Tredrea.

Tredrea/Michael, Westoff/Pears, Motlop/NLM, Ebert/Nash

Tell me you're not serious.

Every one of those matchups is negative for Essendon.
 
How did Bellchambers go on Saturday against John Meesen, an Adelaide reject who can't currently get a game for the worst side in the competition ?

Now how do you think he will go against Brogan and Lade ?

Hardly an unknown commodity.

He played well against Tasmania, Ballarat and Werribee before this weekend. You not willing to judge Laycock on 6 bad games in a row but you are judging
Chambers on one...
 
Tell me you're not serious.

Every one of those matchups is negative for Essendon.

Michael who has been playing well this year on a out of form Tredrea is a bad match up. Our future FB/CHB on another young KP player bad:rolleyes:, NLM on the inconsistent Motlop, only one that doesn't work is Ebert/Nash and Rama/Slattery/Reimers could all have a run on him
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Why the hell would we need many KP defenders against Port? It's not like they have any real Power Forwards apart from Tredrea.

Tredrea/Michael, Westoff/Pears, Motlop/NLM, Ebert/Nash
Ebert to kick 10 if that happens.

Tredrea/Michael
Westoff/Ryder
Motlop/NLM
Ebert/Pears

With Nash playing Mr Unaccountable off half back as he does best :thumbsu:
 
Michael who has been playing well this year on a out of form Tredrea is a bad match up. Our future FB/CHB on another young KP player bad:rolleyes:, NLM on the inconsistent Motlop, only one that doesn't work is Ebert/Nash and Rama/Slattery/Reimers could all have a run on him

Okay.

1. Tredrea roams between the forward 50 and has a big tank. Doesn't take that many marks in contested situation which is where Michael excels in spoliing. Besides if you have been watching Port Adelaide recently Tredrea hasn't been that bad. He is certainly a danger still.

2. Pears was useless on Anzac Day and you want to put him on the dangerous Westhoff. Pears should be one player at Bendigo this weekend if we follow your rules of not rewwarding mediocrity.

3. Why would you put Nash (our best attacking defender) in a role as a minder/tagger on Ebert ? Where does our run out of defense come from then.
Ebert would be perfect for Slattery I would have thought.

4. NLM/Motlop may eventuate but I would be concerned with that one.
 
Ebert to kick 10 if that happens.

Tredrea/Michael
Westoff/Ryder
Motlop/NLM
Ebert/Pears

With Nash playing Mr Unaccountable off half back as he does best :thumbsu:

Paddy on Tredrea - with instructions to drag him up the ground where possible.
Perhaps NLM on Westhoff.

Michael to remain in defensive 50 as a spoiler or to pick up any loose men that come through.

Slattery on Ebert - think he can do a job there.

Would give Welsh first crack at Motlop with a licence to wander up forward and make Motlop accountable.
 
Maybe bring Mcphee back to defence.. spesh coz no fletcher
and put CJ forward? or is he reported?

NO on both counts.

McPhee's days as a defender are over. I would much rather put Pears in defence than put McPhee back there plus McPhee is doing well forward. Johns as a forward is just as silly..he was probably worst on field for us against the Pies..Daniher up forward!:thumbsu:
 
Laycocks learning curve

Jason should play this week, it will give him one more chance to play on the best ruckman going around. All he needs to do is keep up with a 31 year old, on a small ground, and reflect on what he should have been.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top