You are right, but that exactly describes Kane Farrell, who in my mind besides his kick, was a flakey outside player that had nothing else that showed he could make it as a an AFL player. Yet here he is, and I love how he is being used with his weapon, his kicking, being fully utilised, and he has also improved in all his weaker areas. At 24, he has been given three more years to develop than Mead.Mead is too short, not hard enough at the ball, doesn't find enough of it, doesn't provide enough pressure. Kicks pretty well in the field and goal but I don't think he has 'it'. I really liked him around his draft time but he's not really made any progress.
Right now, right this minute, Mead is not at the level required, but IMO we tend to give up too quickly on some young players! If they have ONE weapon, they are worth persisting with, and Meade does have it in his kicking. In fact, I would argue that he has shown more than Farrell at the same age.
Just my thoughts.