- Apr 3, 2006
- 34,620
- 13,363
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Not so sure.
Head hitting the turf has seen reasonable tackles punished.
That was from one of the commentators, so ymmv.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Not so sure.
Head hitting the turf has seen reasonable tackles punished.
That was from one of the commentators, so ymmv.
I didn't hear one word of the commentary.
I'm only going on my judgement from watching a replay without any volume.
A brace or a bump. They are one and the same. It's the old fashioned hip and shoulder that made contact with the head.Honestly thought you were taking the piss with your first couple of posts.
He didn't choose to bump at all. Horrible take.
Are people still assuming Duncan doesn't make contact with the head?He gets him in the head. Zero doubt. Slow it down and watch his head bounce off the point of Duncan’s shoulder.
View attachment 1667746
A brace or a bump. There are one and the same. It's the old fashioned hip and shoulder that made contact with the head.
I'm not sure why some are having difficulty understanding what occurred.
The fact is Duncan was in his bumping motion before Fox overran the ball.
So no, I'm certainly not taking the piss.
And I certainly don't agree with the AFL's interpretations either or the way they police it, but the players are well aware of the consequences of their actions should they elect to bump..
But it's Christian... He should have been replaced years ago. He's incompetent.
What you've just posted is your imagination.How can you be attacking the football, have your opponent kamikaze you ignoring the football, dive headfirst at you, and be considered to be laying a bump?
It sounded like a quoted rule - where if the bump is fair, head contact with the turf afterward is not considered to be the bumpers fault.
Or they could have been making it up, who knows.
A brace or a bump. They are one and the same. It's the old fashioned hip and shoulder that made contact with the head.
I'm not sure why some are having difficulty understanding what occurred.
The fact is Duncan was in his bumping motion before Fox overran the ball.
So no, I'm certainly not taking the piss.
And I certainly don't agree with the AFL's interpretations either or the way they police it, but the players are well aware of the consequences of their actions should they elect to bump..
But it's Christian... He should have been replaced years ago. He's incompetent.
It'll get to the stage where every player will be forced to wear a helmet.The head is sacrosanct.
Any contact that causes any impact to the head will be carefully scrutinised.
The head is sacrosanct.
Any contact that causes any impact to the head will be carefully scrutinised.
Ok. We'll agree to disagree.A brace is not a bump.
A brace is when you brace for contact to protect yourself (head or legs in particular) as we have been taught growing up for decades.
A bump is when you actively move yourself towards another player with an intent to hit them in the chest.
They might look similar to some people but they are very different.
Players brace for contact hundreds of times a game and those instances are not bumps.
It'll get to the stage where every player will be forced to wear a helmet.
How can you be attacking the football, have your opponent kamikaze you ignoring the football, dive headfirst at you, and be considered to be laying a bump?
What was the cause though?
I'd say there is some form of protection given otherwise why the hell does Daniel wear one. It isn't to hide a deformity.Helmets dont do much to protect from concussion though (insofar as the current research tells us this could change as more becomes known about concussion).
Ok. We'll agree to disagree.
Brace or bump actually doesn’t matter. It’s forceful contact to the head under the rules.A brace is not a bump.
A brace is when you brace for contact to protect yourself (head or legs in particular) as we have been taught growing up for decades.
A bump is when you actively move yourself towards another player with an intent to hit them in the chest.
They might look similar to some people but they are very different.
Players brace for contact hundreds of times a game and those instances are not bumps.
It'll get to the stage where every player will be forced to wear a helmet.
I'd say there is some form of protection given otherwise why the hell does Daniel wear one. It isn't to hide a deformity.
A brace is not a bump.
A brace is when you brace for contact to protect yourself (head or legs in particular) as we have been taught growing up for decades.
A bump is when you actively move yourself towards another player with an intent to hit them in the chest.
They might look similar to some people but they are very different.
Players brace for contact hundreds of times a game and those instances are not bumps.
There is no 'head first dive'.
Fox tries to position himself between Duncan and the ball. He is upright, on his knees essentially, when Duncan hits him.
I have no doubt that will be the case.No doubt science will be working on some sort of head device that protects sportspeople from concussion better.