It would have to be McAdam
Crows choice i guess ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It would have to be McAdam
It would have to be McAdam
Carlton would have to turn that 24 25 into a higher pick themselves and then give us that pick...we don’t want to have to do that work.....and I’m happyMate, I doubt you’d find any Carlton supporters that disagree with a trade involving pick 24 and state player, or pick 24 & 25.
We are happy to make that trade every day of the week.
We aren’t the ones arguing with that idea, it’s many of your fellow crow supporters that seem to think they have us over a barrel and can demand more as though we are so desperate for McGovern that we’d pay whatever Adelaide demand lol
What they can’t seem to grasp is that if Adelaide don’t accept our offer, we are more than glad for Adelaide to keep a disgruntled McGovern on their list because we won’t be paying overs, simple as that
Carlton would have to turn that 24 25 into a higher pick themselves and then give us that pick...we don’t want to have to do that work.....and I’m happy
Mate, I doubt you’d find any Carlton supporters that disagree with a trade involving pick 24 and state player, or pick 24 & 25.
We are happy to make that trade every day of the .
We aren’t the ones arguing with that idea, it’s many of your fellow crow supporters that seem to think they have us over a barrel and can demand more as though we are so desperate for McGovern that we’d pay whatever Adelaide demand lol
What they can’t seem to grasp is that if Adelaide don’t accept our offer, we are more than glad for Adelaide to keep a disgruntled McGovern on their list because we won’t be paying overs, simple as that
You'd find plenty disagreeing with the 24/25 bundle. Way overs. 24 & a nudge..
Lol, stop stirring up the crowd supporters, even if it’s fun to do
He’s not stiring, I think he’s genuinely cluelessLol, stop stirring up the crowd supporters, even if it’s fun to do
He’s not stiring, I think he’s genuinely clueless
As much as a lot of Carlton fans don’t rate him high he will become a very good player... he’s a better fit for Carlton’s forward line a lot of young blokes like himself they will form a good understanding...he is a ready made player that is in Carlton best 22... Carlton fans if he comes to your club and you watch him every week and actually see what he is capable of, you will start to understand why crows fans rate him.And trust me, if SOS can find someone to swap those picks with, he will do it, he’ll definitely try.
It’s not like we won’t try to find you a higher pick if someone wants to swap, I’m sure SOS is working the phones trying to do it
No it wont be a 1st round+ and obviously you know that. Bloody obvious you post stupidity for the sake of annoying posters. Not one person in the media is even remotely suggesting a top ten pick would be on the table. Not even Andrew McGovern would expect a top ten pick in exchange for his son. Ill bet the pick is after 13 once the Lynch compensation (After 12 in the unlikely event GC matches all offers) is handed out. If it is more (in terms of draft pick value) ill come on this thread and post that you are right and I was way off in my understanding of afl trade. If it is a higher pick than thirteen (not points, as two second rounders is more points than pick 13, but rather the pick offered) then you do the same and post that you were wrong and dont understand afl trade in this thread. Zero chance you'll accept the offer of the bet as it insanely obvious you are simply using the McGovern situation to mindlessly abuse rival posters.What???. How about you admit you are wrong as reality will bite hard when carlton pay overs and overs aint 2 x 2nd rounders..it will be well into the 1st round +
I agree with the vast majority of what you have said, except the last part. Carlton naturally have to pay overs for a player who is under contract for two more seasons, like Adelaide had to for Gibbs.Mate, I doubt you’d find any Carlton supporters that disagree with a trade involving pick 24 and state player, or pick 24 & 25.
We are happy to make that trade every day of the week.
We aren’t the ones arguing with that idea, it’s many of your fellow crow supporters that seem to think they have us over a barrel and can demand more as though we are so desperate for McGovern that we’d pay whatever Adelaide demand lol
What they can’t seem to grasp is that if Adelaide don’t accept our offer, we are more than glad for Adelaide to keep a disgruntled McGovern on their list because we won’t be paying overs, simple as that
We have to pay brown bags over the top now instead of under the table? Oh man...I agree with the vast majority of what you have said, except the last part. Carlton naturally have to pay overs for a player who is under contract for two more seasons, like Adelaide had to for Gibbs.
With Silvagni in charge, nothing would surprise meWe have to pay brown bags over the top now instead of under the table? Oh man...
Swans Lose pick 12 and get pick 24 and 25.I'm not stirring bro. That's just the price point. Pick 24 doesn't get the casual 25 tack on. Mitch sits around the 20 mark for value.
And the point is ??? .....hope you're not basing your arguments on an "Age Article"Fairfax Media has also reported that injured forward Mitch McGovern, who signed a new deal late last year, is also keen to leave the club.
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/camp-fail-crows-part-with-collective-mind-20180623-p4znbs.html
Long before we were linked. Long before. There was another in March. Cant find it, but Im looking for you buddy
Swans Lose pick 12 and get pick 24 and 25.
Adelaide lose McGovern and get pick 12
Blues lose picks 24 and 25 and get McGovern.
That appears to be a popular trade scenario .....I'm not against it, albeit there "maybe" steak knives attached ....but my issue still remains, that still makes it difficult for Carlton to get other players they're linked to ..... Shiel, Fasolo, Setterfield .....is SOS "Felix the Cat"Swans Lose pick 12 and get pick 24 and 25.
Adelaide lose McGovern and get pick 12
Blues lose picks 24 and 25 and get McGovern.
If the House fails to reach the "reserved" price ......it's often withdrawn, unless the owner must sell ...this is the delusion you're under, the Crows are happy to retain McGovernCrows choice i guess ...
Answer # 2 to your post .....no, it's absolutely your choiceCrows choice i guess ...
OMG .....you just lumped every State League player around the Country at the same level in the Draft ......WOW what ignoranceYeah I don't think we'll be chucking Weitering up for trade.
Besides state league players are worth around 20 to 30. Weitering is playing like someone worth around 20 to 30.
Why is 24 and dibs on a state league player not enough? How is it any worse than what you came up with?
You'd think it would get done early. Contracted, around the 20 mark- he has ability but needs to take it to the next level. Value doesn't change with mass foaming, unless you cave in like the Dees and Lions did
100%It takes 2 picks in the 20's to get 1 player to get to 100 games.
Seriously, people over value picks.