- Thread starter
- #8,626
Do you want to read his post again, comprehend it, and reconsider your post?Just looking at his post, he didn't say there were 14 players in front of Daicos did he ? He said 2 or 3.
Comprehension - is important
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Do you want to read his post again, comprehend it, and reconsider your post?Just looking at his post, he didn't say there were 14 players in front of Daicos did he ? He said 2 or 3.
Comprehension - is important
I'm not convinced of that. His support crew will be worse ( pendles will be gone) . Judd won a brownlow in his 3rd year, didn't get any better at Carlton in a less performing team. You could argue a similar case with Daicos moving forward
If ALL of these players were on the draft board, and available to play at your club in 2025 (let alone for the next 10 years), 100% of coaches and list managers are picking Daicos.Currently rather busy but off the top of my head Gawn, Pettraca, Curnow. Hogan, Heeney are all better right now, with a host of players who are about at an equal level.
I've read it again. He did not say there were 14 players in front of him.Do you want to read his post again, comprehend it, and reconsider your post?
and you know this because ......If ALL of these players were on the draft board, and available to play at your club in 2025 (let alone for the next 10 years), 100% of coaches and list managers are picking Daicos.
When someone disputes your suggestion that a player is top 2 or 3, and instead goes with top 15, the INFERENCE is that there are 14 players ahead of him.I've read it again. He did not say there were 14 players in front of him.
Because... I watch football games and have common sense.and you know this because ......
No, the inference was that he was grouped with a bunch of other players around the same level, but not in the top 2 or 3When someone disputes your suggestion that a player is top 2 or 3, and instead goes with top 15, the INFERENCE is that there are 14 players ahead of him.
Oh, so you haven't asked the coaches or list managers of their thoughts . I assumed you were connected.Because... I watch football games and have common sense.
No, I didn't have time to survey all the AFL coaches and list managers in the two minutes between when the list was posted, and when I responded to the post.Oh, so you haven't asked the coaches or list managers of their thoughts . I assumed you were connected.
Just checking
OK, so if I corrected someone who rated McKay in the top 50 players in the comp and said, 'Nah, I've got him in the Top 200', you wouldn't question that because you'd assume I must have 100 or 150 players at around the same level as Harry?No, the inference was that he was grouped with a bunch of other players around the same level, but not in the top 2 or 3
Stick to what was actually written by the posterOK, so if I corrected someone who rated McKay in the top 50 players in the comp and said, 'Nah, I've got him in the Top 200', you wouldn't question that because you'd assume I must have 100 or 150 players at around the same level as Harry?
Interesting thought process.
Indeed.Daicos might be behind only Bont and Cripps at the moment. Absolute star. On a par with Neale, However, unlike Daicos, these guys and Heaney, Petracca, Martin, etc can take a contested mark. He will also need to improve his contested ground ball work before he is in the conversation for the best current player let alone the GOAT.
If ALL of these players were on the draft board, and available to play at your club in 2025 (let alone for the next 10 years), 100% of coaches and list managers are picking Daicos.
Do you ever not argue ??OK, so if I corrected someone who rated McKay in the top 50 players in the comp and said, 'Nah, I've got him in the Top 200', you wouldn't question that because you'd assume I must have 100 or 150 players at around the same level as Harry?
Interesting thought process.
Yes.Do you ever not argue ??
Daicos is the best 184cm / 79 kilo player in the AFL.Indeed.
Cripps' 0.3 contested marks per game (despite being 4 inches taller and 20 kg's heavier) really separate him from Daicos.
Nick Daicos and Cripps are first 2 picked in any AA teamAlthough Fly couldn't influence Champion's Data to make their all Australian team.
Cmon Walshy, you’re trolling now.Making up? Think just about everyone knows Flybagger McRae was doing the dodgy business on the coaches votes. Was clear as day
Very doubtful.Most would agree that has some merit
Even some of your own supporters were saying the same after the Carlton game when Flybagger gave him 5 votes. I believe the quotes were along the lines of "playing Hinkley levels of coaches vote favouritism". Made the award a farce this year and no doubt he'll ride him all the way home with 2 more 5 voters the last fortnight.Cmon Walshy, you’re trolling now.
Who deserves the 5 votes in Collingwood's last two games, if not Daicos?Even some of your own supporters were saying the same after the Carlton game when Flybagger gave him 5 votes. I believe the quotes were along the lines of "playing Hinkley levels of coaches vote favouritism". Made the award a farce this year and no doubt he'll ride him all the way home with 2 more 5 voters the last fortnight.
Hopefully Goodwin gave Nicky a big fat 0 to even things up after his blatant stat padding performance vs the Dees last week.
Would just be evening things up after Fly made an absolute mockery of the award this season. How annoyed would you be if Goodwin gave botched votes this week which meant Nicky missed out on winning the coaches award?Who deserves the 5 votes in Collingwood's last two games, if not Daicos?
Good to see you're hoping another coach destroys the integrity of the award by not giving deserved votes, whilst at the same time complaining about another coach allegedly awarding 'undeserved' votes...
Some would consider that as 'hypocritical'.