gringo2011
Premium Platinum
"Without him we dont get near the opportunities we had forward."
I took that to mean you thought we needed him him more in the ruck because we need as any opportunities inside 50 as we can get.
Again the issue is not whether Marshall is an ordinary forward, its whether he maybe the best option given our lack of available choices.
I'd be happy to play King Cordy or even Battle but none of them are available and as "ordinary" as Marshall may be as a forward, I think he might be a substantially better option than Sharman.
I know you hate Sharman but this is just nonsense. Marshall's best ever return in a season is 13 goals in 19 games with peak Ryder letting him play forward more often- most other years he's averaged around 8 or 9 a season. Sharman in the same year played 3 full games and one at 39% TOG and kicked 10.
If I had a choice between who I'd want as a forward it's not Marshall.