CrashTestDummy
Club Legend
- Jun 22, 2011
- 2,576
- 1,206
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Saskatchewan Roughriders
Macca you beaut
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
*6mins later
Kosi, assist to Armitage, goal.
Yup, done nothing.
Whoever the sub is should come in for Kosi.Wilkes as a sub for Kosi next week?
Okay, so let me know your argument for why he's had a good game.Ah the stats man, excuse me, I thought I was speaking to someone who knew football. My mistake, shant happen again.
Wilkes kicked 5 today. Get him in there....
Okay, so let me know your argument for why he's had a good game.
I admit, he has contributed. But the fact that he consistently goes missing for 80% of the game just isn't good enough. Kosi really needs to play 4 quarters, bobbing up for a goal or two as a key forward isn't what should be happening. I'm by no means a Kosi hater, just frustrated at his lack of consistency as I'm sure every St Kilda supporter is.Geary hits Kosis left tit, Kosi boots a goal from the 50m paint.
Never said he's had a good game freaky one, you're trying to insert words into my mouth because I disagreed with your outlandish comment. Kosi has contributed, he's been a viable target, had several assists, taken some strong marks and kicked goals. Is there a player on our list who could have done better? Probably, probably not, who knows.
I'd be scolding Cripps & Gilbert and giving Steven a bit of a "see what happens when you try hitting a target and running?" before I even thought of speaking to Kosi about fading out of games.
Because Stanley is there.
Riewoldt is there.
Macca drifts forward.
Do we really need a 4th tall demanding that same attention?
I am not there to see his work off the ball, if any, but you are just hating sir.
Great work Saints.
Great to kick straight too.
We hammered them. Well done Mr.Watters!
Next week will be more telling, but that said a top 8 team should be thrashing GC by 80+ points and we did thatDon´t write us off yet we are not gonna slide like most are tipping.
Next week will be more telling, but that said a top 8 team should be thrashing GC by 80+ points and we did that
Weren't you saying last week that he had small man syndrome and should be sacked?
It's just that I find your congratulating of Watters quite contrary to your opinion of last week that he should be sacked. You shouldn't base your entire opinion of him as a coach on the result of that week's game.What else did I say you selective quoting saintsrfreak?
You want me to dig it up from the archives and post it?
Kicking with a 2-3 goal wind down by 5 points at 3/4 time and playing two rucks in the backline when their Newbie Ruck is subbed.
Watters cost us 4 points last week.
Get over it saintsrfreak.
Beating a development team that has been in the league for one season by 92 points is great.
I'm not complaining about today but last week any Saints fan with any idea about the game would have to be livid with the result.
It's just that I find your congratulating of Watters quite contrary to your opinion of last week that he should be sacked. You shouldn't base your entire opinion of him as a coach on the result of that week's game.
I'm not gonna look through the archives but I distinctly remember you saying to sack him.I didn't say he should be sacked.
You should choose your words carefully there pal.
I said he was responsible for the loss. And guess what.....?
Scott Watters was responsible for the loss against Port Adelaide.
Why do you think the Saints lost last week saintrsfreak?