Me too.
Could we see some old school ross the boss?
Make it a negative scrap and 'park the bus'?
View attachment 1955307
Am I missing something, or are we seven short on the field?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me too.
Could we see some old school ross the boss?
Make it a negative scrap and 'park the bus'?
View attachment 1955307
That's seven players that can't get injured this week. Great planning.Am I missing something, or are we seven short on the field?
Exactly- hate to be a backline player when our mids are having an ordinary dayThe EF had more to do with how our midfield was going than Zlugger.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cordy was getting murdered in one on one contests with Hogan. No matter how good the midfield is that will happen again.Cordy will stand up as long as our midfield does.
How much scar tissue will be messing up the Saints from last year’s final!?
Toby and co. gave us a lesson-and-a- messin’
Cordy was Caminiti were rendered dysfunctional. Members was absent but had been a shadow of himself in prior games. Butler shouldn’t have played and with his ankle, couldnt kick over a tin can. Wilkie was easily beaten, and nurtured.
The King was a threat.
Even with all this, we should remember that we did make a couple of threatening pushes during the game, including the third quarter and started to close the gap.
But seeing that first quarter, especially after the first ten minutes, seeing how easily they sliced us up like melting butter to get into f50 and outmaneuver our defence - it wasn’t pretty.
So now what? Members? Coming back for revenge? GWS swill be stealing themselves, yelling themselves the Saints want revenge. And they won’t use the same game plan twice.
As has been pointed out, they e had a soft draw on paper, but the coastal teams are actually better this year.
Cordy was getting murdered in one on one contests with Hogan. No matter how good the midfield is that will happen again.
But yes, reduce the I50s and you win half the battle there.
Clearances 35 to 36How much scar tissue will be messing up the Saints from last year’s final!?
Toby and co. gave us a lesson-and-a- messin’
Cordy was Caminiti were rendered dysfunctional. Members was absent but had been a shadow of himself in prior games. Butler shouldn’t have played and with his ankle, couldnt kick over a tin can. Wilkie was easily beaten, and nurtured.
The King was a threat.
Even with all this, we should remember that we did make a couple of threatening pushes during the game, including the third quarter and started to close the gap.
But seeing that first quarter, especially after the first ten minutes, seeing how easily they sliced us up like melting butter to get into f50 and outmaneuver our defence - it wasn’t pretty.
So now what? Members? Coming back for revenge? GWS swill be stealing themselves, yelling themselves the Saints want revenge. And they won’t use the same game plan twice.
As has been pointed out, they e had a soft draw on paper, but the coastal teams are actually better this year.
Clearances 35 to 36
I agree with this ... yeah we were up and about vs the pies, but have been half asleep the other games. Kingers has even said that we won't be playing our best footy this time of year, so I reckon it's a real 50/50 gameGWS haven't got out of pre-season practice mode yet. Roos, Eagles, a bye and the Suns. They haven't faced 4 quarters of pressure footy. They may have more individual weapons at this stage of the season, but our team game is getting closer to being very good.
All that "dominance" for a 4 goal win in a game where a fair bit went right for them and very little for us.Doesn't tell you squat, because that includes around the ground clearances AND doesn't say anything about the quality of clearances.
They utterly destroyed our midfield in the centre square.
They kicked 4 goals directly from centre bounce clearances to our zero.
Plus the "Giants led effective clearances 32-25 and points scored from stoppages 54-27"
They had over 20% more centre clearances than us 14 to 11.
Briggs and kelly nearly had more than our entire team.
All that "dominance" for a 4 goal win in a game where a fair bit went right for them and very little for us.
I think we are a chance.
Don't need glasses of any type - quite comfortable about my view of that final. We lost but we weren't hopelessly outclassed.A 4 goal margin is pretty large given we only kicked 11 of them.
As for the asertion that they 'jumped us early cos of members etc'
View attachment 1955465
Yeah nah mate.
It was 2 goals to 1 in our favour goal for the first 20 minutes of the game.
I'm not saying anything about our prospects this week- but simply pointing out that you have huge rose tinted glasses on over that final.
They pantsed us comfortably
The bigger ground will help our halfbacks , with Nas and Sinclair getting back to his best we should be in good shape.I re-watched the Tigers game again this afternoon. We will need to significantly reduce our fumbling, dropped marks and missed passes against GWS. The one thing we have in our favour is the bigger ground at Manuka, suits our game style much better. Obviously we struggle with the in close tighter scrambled games, so a ground that gives us space will help.
When we do win possession against the Giants we will need to do our best to maintain possession and avoid there intercept game.
I think we are a chance v GWS but not favorites. And they didn’t jump us because of Members. If anything we surprised them at the start..and then they preceded to destroy us until that late comeback. Membrey had been poor last year anyway. And all those stats don’t reflect the quality of disposals etc. But we are a chance. Anything can happen, but based off the final and first month of this season, there are no reasons to think we’d be favorites IMOThe bigger ground will help our halfbacks , with Nas and Sinclair getting back to his best we should be in good shape.
Hopefully Hill has a big game as well.
If our forwards fire and we can put scoreboard pressure on them we should have a very good chance of winning this game - but they have to start to kick straight.
We were taken apart in the final due to there mids run wild - Tom Greene 35 touches , Whitfield 31 , Ash 31 , Kelly 30 ---- if we can break even in this department we will have a chance of beating them.I think we are a chance v GWS but not favorites. And they didn’t jump us because of Members. If anything we surprised them at the start..and then they preceded to destroy us until that late comeback. Membrey had been poor last year anyway. And all those stats don’t reflect the quality of disposals etc. But we are a chance. Anything can happen, but based off the final and first month of this season, there are no reasons to think we’d be favorites IMO
I think we are a chance v GWS but not favorites. And they didn’t jump us because of Members. If anything we surprised them at the start..and then they preceded to destroy us until that late comeback. Membrey had been poor last year anyway. And all those stats don’t reflect the quality of disposals etc. But we are a chance. Anything can happen, but based off the final and first month of this season, there are no reasons to think we’d be favorites IMO