Certified Legendary Thread Sack Hinkley 12 - Finals Are Scary

Remove this Banner Ad

I wonder if Aiston would have the guts to tell Crows fans the same thing about Nicks, "I really think that Matthew is your man. Yes he hasn't got you into the finals yet, but given the fact that the team is competitive most weeks, it's just a matter of time before it happens."
There is no way that creepazoid says anything bad about the Cows unless he's allowed to.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Definitely a cult. It's all about Kenny Hinkley.

The players play for Kenny and not for the club. The CEO has said that the club fears an exodus of players when Kenny leaves.

This is what the club that sacked a club legend in Russell Ebert, didn't renew the contract of club legend Jack Cahill and sacked its only AFL flag winning coach in Mark Williams has become. None of those greats were bigger than the club but under the current management we are the Port Adelaide Football Club in name only. It's all about Kenny Hinkley. :mad:
Meanwhile, if someone asks me post Hinkley's departure, "What do you think about Ken leaving?", my response will be brief and to the point, "Who?"
 
Wouldn't be surprised if the Club propose a payout of his final year to be paid over 3 years with increases each year to account for inflation. This would reduce the impact on the footy department expenditure.
If he gets any job within the footy industry, then do we still have to pay his full contract out?
 
Rooch will sob on live radio if Ken got sacked.

Rooch is a coward sell-out.

I remember when he called me out on his show for posting Hinkley stats on Twitter. He demanded I replicate the stats of every other AFL coach for a comparison. I said I would if he agreed to speak to them on his segment. Of course he didn’t.

He then proceeded to private message me and claimed I was just a troll - Mark Ricciuto specifically - who was trying to bring down Port Adelaide.
 
If he gets any job within the footy industry, then do we still have to pay his full contract out?

That again would depend on the written language in the contract and any subsequent termination thereof.

I am privy to lots of information. I am not privy to the exact language of Ken's contract.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What could possibly be worse than donuts?

There are plenty. If we end up with one, we sack him. Hinkley’s not good enough. That’s all that matters now.
 
This guy predicted we would beat Sydney a few days ago. What's happened to the list since then?
The list needs more depth, whether we have a good list or not there is no reason/excuse to lose by nearly a 100 points in a home final when you are hot favourites. That needs to be addressed first. Mentally we have massive issues.
On field leadership is non existent.
Off field they need a new voice new ideas. A coach who didn’t retire 30 years ago.
I would also employ a Selwood type who knows how to lead and be successful as Brisbane have done with Cotchin.
 
That again would depend on the written language in the contract and any subsequent termination thereof.

I am privy to lots of information. I am not privy to the exact language of Ken's contract.
Would've thought something like this would have been more an AFL wide rule so that coaches dont double dip but understand that you may not be privy to that information and fairly so.
 
Does anyone else have a specific tenet of their preferred gameplan listed as an indelible feature of the club’s strategic direction?

Like, not an overarching unspoken philosophy such as “Pittsburgh Steelers = strong defensive foundations” or “Tottenham Hotspur = attractive attacking football”, but specifically “take the corridor” in print?

View attachment 2119351

Entrusted largely to a 36 year old whose kicking has never been his 1-wood, and an injury-riddled utility who looked cooked for the better part of 18 months… in a Prelim.

Mmmm… more of everyone responsible for this, please!
lol the capitals randomly used. Expectation lowercase, Heat upper case, each other lower case, In upper case. Corridor uppercase.

This is a north star document used to sell the club to people and guide our principals and yet it's got shoddy shit like this in it. This is a place that turns over a ****tonne each year and is meant to be the best in the country. Lmao.
 
I just knew Rooches article would all boil down to lack of list and getting behind Ken, "barbarians at the gates"

Not one mention of the tired and predictable game-plan.

He's a cancer to this joint.

How many more years should we "get behind Ken" Rooch?

2027? 2029? 2032?






On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
He's on the pay roll
 
lol the capitals randomly used. Expectation lowercase, Heat upper case, each other lower case, In upper case. Corridor uppercase.

This is a north star document used to sell the club to people and guide our principals and yet it's got shoddy shit like this in it. This is a place that turns over a ****tonne each year and is meant to be the best in the country. Lmao.
Give a Shit
 
Had several “round the water cooler” chats with colleagues today.

The “wHo U guNna GEt?!?!” dialogue from those who have no idea is alive and well, let me tell you. What could possibly be worse than donuts? These people are delusional.

I am also astounded at the number of Port Adelaide fans I know socially who espouse the idea that "it's not the coach's fault, it's the players." It's like they cannot fathom the link between what the players produce on the field and the strategy and tactics the coach sets.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread Sack Hinkley 12 - Finals Are Scary

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top