Unofficial Preview Sack Hinkley 2: Septic Portaloo

Part 2?? Why hasn’t Ken been sacked yet???


  • Total voters
    200

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm still angry about the Richmond game in Round 4. If we miss finals by a game and that loss costs Ken his job, it would be fitting.
The GWS game makes me angrier. We went into that game with a forward structure we'd used multiple times and failed with multiple times. And we had options.

The Round 4 Richmond game, we hadn't failed multiple times with said forward structure yet. Despite everything against the Lions we probably would've won if we'd kicked straight in the first 3 quarters of the game. Brisbane would've been 5 goals down at 3/4 time instead of still in the game.

Also in the round 4 game, Frampton was suspended from previous SANFL game and so the SANFL forward option was Marshall. And Marshall hadn't played well at all in the previous SANFL game.
 
I'm still angry about the Richmond game in Round 4. If we miss finals by a game and that loss costs Ken his job, it would be fitting.
That was an all time coaching performance.
1. Coming up against a side low on confidence, talk yourself down during the week - “uncomfortable being favorites”
2. Select a poorly structured side that hides the oppositions deficiencies
3. Make no changes during the game despite being slaughtered for playing poorly structured football
4. Post game say how far in front as a club the opposition are

What a fraud.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The GWS game makes me angrier. We went into that game with a forward structure we'd used multiple times and failed with multiple times. And we had options ....
The option was the one we used so successfully in the West Coast game after the R4 Richmond loss where we spent the entire final quarter kicking it to the Tigers' defenders. What Hinkley called 'dirty footy' from memory where against West Coast the the ball entries up forward were meant hit the ground and couldn't be directly intercepted. If deliberate and not a cover for poor skills it was fantastic. We only had to win 2 or 3 of the ground ball contests and convert and we were better off than any other of our games v WC in recent years. Yet we've never done it again, GWS was just a replay of R4. I mean I swear sometimes we didn't even have a forward near where the GWS defenders were when we kicked in. An absolutely coach-free game IMO.
 
As much as we want Kenny gone, you can't deny, the players love playing for him.
We've had many players sign-on this year under him, with plenty of belief in him still remaining in most of our players.
It's a shame, hopefully, our next coach will have an equal or greater amount of personal connection with the players and group.
I think a lot of the players (not all, I gather) like Ken as a person and a mentor but I'm not sure about playing for him. If they loved playing for him then surely we wouldn't see performances like last weekend. Someone posted recently that they look like they have lost patience with the chopping and changing of game plans and are now just confused, I think there may be a fair bit of truth in that.
 
I think a lot of the players (not all, I gather) like Ken as a person and a mentor but I'm not sure about playing for him. If they loved playing for him then surely we wouldn't see performances like last weekend. Someone posted recently that they look like they have lost patience with the chopping and changing of game plans and are now just confused, I think there may be a fair bit of truth in that.
Yes they have appeared confused for years now.
It’s like he has been trying to get an edge but has just ended up doing the exact opposite.
 
I want Ken gone as much as the next person, but Bickley said something the other night to Tredders which resonated with me.

He said, "Hinkley knows he has conditional clauses in his contract where he must make finals in order to unlock the 2021 year. Hinkley could have just kept Wingard and Polec (both contracted) and pushed to make the 8 and play it safe for his own benefit, yet he got rid of those two and blooded kids all year risking his own future at the club, in the attmept to better the overall future of the club"

Bickley actually has a point here. I think Ken actually does care about the club despite some people on here thinking otherwise, but he just doesn't have the nous of a good coach to take the club where it needs to be.

I'd be more interested in what Tredders thought about that.
 
A better coach wins us the games against GWS, Richmond Round 4 and possibly even against Brisbane at the GABBA which would have been a massive win.
Had Hinkley just stuck fat with a decent forward structure from early in the season we would be one or two games clear in the top 8 at least IMO.
 
Port Adelaide's financial position was the lead story on 7 News tonight. Apparently we're one of 4 clubs on the AFL's financial watch list. It's just a coincidence that all this new information emerges right as pressure to sack Hinkley reaches unchartered territory, right? **** Hinkley and **** his slimy manager.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

2.6 Subject to clause 12.10, the Board of Directors will comprise:
12.6.1 two persons nominated to the AFL by the Club Membership ("Club nominees"); and
12.6.2 eight persons appointed by the AFL.
12.7 The AFL may in its absolute discretion decline to approve the appointment a Club nominee. In that event, the Club Membership is entitled to nominate a replacement person for approval by the AFL as a Director.

Do we need a majority of these AFL plants to agree to sack Ken before it can happen?
 
Had Hinkley just stuck fat with a decent forward structure from early in the season we would be one or two games clear in the top 8 at least IMO.
Too simplistic. If we had a reliable and consistently productive forward structure we'd play it every week. He experimented with Howard and it worked a bit. He persisted with a mostly terrible Marshall and eventually got some results which might pay off in the future. He brought Dixon back and is trying to make him functional. And so on. Robbie Gray is probably the only forward we have who has any consistency.
 
Port Adelaide's financial position was the lead story on 7 News tonight. Apparently we're one of 4 clubs on the AFL's financial watch list. It's just a coincidence that all this new information emerges right as pressure to sack Hinkley reaches unchartered territory, right? fu** Hinkley and fu** his slimy manager.
It sounds like we are almost as badly off as we were when KT and Koch took over.
 
Something significant is happening behind the scenes. Read into it what you like, but the fact that KT has flown out to China on short notice, & multiple board members including Kochie & KT, have pulled out of pre-scheduled media commitments makes me think change is in the air.

I think the end is much closer then people think.
A n t i c i p a t i o n n n

On SM-G920I using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Too simplistic. If we had a reliable and consistently productive forward structure we'd play it every week. He experimented with Howard and it worked a bit. He persisted with a mostly terrible Marshall and eventually got some results which might pay off in the future. He brought Dixon back and is trying to make him functional. And so on. Robbie Gray is probably the only forward we have who has any consistency.
News flash a forward structure is simple & young key forwards need to be backed in for more than a fortnight.
Frampton should've been playing until Dixon was ready with either Marshall or Howard.

*You can add in that the SANFL is a dire place to blood young KPF's
 
News flash a forward structure is simple & young key forwards need to be backed in for more than a fortnight.
Frampton should've been playing until Dixon was ready with either Marshall or Howard.

*You can add in that the SANFL is a dire place to blood young KPF's
I forgot Frampton but yeah that was another development play and/or experiment with the forward line and in general I give credit for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top