DaTBird187
What D Farke?
- Feb 9, 2014
- 17,413
- 47,039
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Boston Celtics
Sack Hinkley 7 - The Wrath of Carn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why are things so out of whack between board, president, CEO, coaches, players and fans?
We used to be a club well aligned in message and goal.
The club brought out this by 2025 plan - should all be clear as mud. But there is such disconnect between the club and the fans now and, I suspect, this is echoed internally.
Why has this occurred? It’s not just because of Hinkley.
Why are things so out of whack between board, president, CEO, coaches, players and fans?
We used to be a club well aligned in message and goal.
The club brought out this by 2025 plan - should all be clear as mud. But there is such disconnect between the club and the fans now and, I suspect, this is echoed internally.
Why has this occurred? It’s not just because of Hinkley.
Did Holly contribute on the board last year? Looks like she was busy earning a Harvard degree.
Does Harvard do degrees on LinkedIn corporate speak now?
If we didnt sack Primus there would be a Sack Primus thread and I would be the thundercloud of this forumI mean... that's a stretch.
Moving on Primus was the right decision I think.
It's more the context of how everything has gone since, that has made the sliding doors of 'gee, what if we didn't sack Primus?' look more legitimate. If we had of sacked Hinkley as a reasonable moment consistent with the ethos of this football club, nobody would be talking about Primus.
It's definitely true that Matthew Primus operated with far more accountability, far less support, and far less selfishness, than Ken Hinkley, without comparing coaching.
I am happy though I get to listen to him on the radio talk footy still, at least. He's still miles better to listen to than Ken. And he doesn't sound any dumber, maybe even more insightful.
Intellectual honesty. A hunger for evidence. Familiarity with a wide range of analytic methods. An urge to extract answers from the clutter of real-world public problems.
Those are just some of the characteristics of someone who pursues the Master in Public Policy (MPP). It’s a rigorous two-year program that prepares you to understand complex problems and craft concrete solutions. Through courses, exercises and fieldwork, you master concepts and skills that draw on the social sciences but are adapted for action.
A defining feature of the MPP is its relevance: You can take what you learn here, apply it in the real world, and deliver results.
The Complete MPP
At the heart of the program is a core curriculum that lets you learn across a range of areas. Classes are taught using a combination of traditional lectures and the case method, which was pioneered at Harvard. You will work with world-renowned faculty members in a collaborative environment.
Best of all, your classmates will be as diverse and interesting as the issues you investigate and the problems you solve.
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
YesCan anyone confirm whether the Board is meeting this Wednesday?
Yes they areCan anyone confirm whether the Board is meeting this Wednesday?
Anyone seen the agenda?Yes they are