Its 1.7% but really its being propped up by the Greens vote. He will be fine.What was the margin in the Dutton's electorate last election?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 0
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Its 1.7% but really its being propped up by the Greens vote. He will be fine.What was the margin in the Dutton's electorate last election?
You seriously think Tim Wilson will get back in?
What is about Wilson that is 'far-right'?sadly, it’s possible. the libs are pouring in big bucks, spreading misinformation, and targeting her at a personal level. wilson is a self-obsessed far-rightist who did sfa for his electorate cos he thought his blue-ribbon seat was his for life.
the issue daniel has is that a lot of libs voted for her cos they loathed morrison. that factor doesn’t apply now. although many don’t like wilson. so here’s hoping.
Its 1.7% but really its being propped up by the Greens vote. He will be fine.
If you don't think that Labor HQ will be desperately trying to distance themselves from the Greens and Teals during the election campaign, then all I can say is please volunteer to be a Labor adviser.
I will repeat - Being associated with the Greens and Teals is a certain vote LOSER for the swing voter.
He holds it with a 3.4% margin however the swing needed is 1.7%.Quite the ‘advice giver’ aren’t you? I suggest you study basics before getting onto ‘big stuff’
Dutton holds he seat with a 3% margin not 1.7%
Abbott was only 'deeply unpopular' with those that never would have voted for the Coalition anyway. If someone had said this time last year that Trump would win the election as well as the overall vote and both houses then you would have said they were crazy.
Expect a similar rout in Australia at the next election. And unlike the Democrats, Labor have been given due warning.
What is about Wilson that is 'far-right'?
He holds it with a 3.4% margin however the swing needed is 1.7%.
When party people talk about electoral seats they generally talk in the context of 'swing needed', not current margin.
sadly, it’s possible. the libs are pouring in big bucks, spreading misinformation, and targeting her at a personal level. wilson is a self-obsessed far-rightist who did sfa for his electorate cos he thought his blue-ribbon seat was his for life.
the issue daniel has is that a lot of libs voted for her cos they loathed morrison. that factor doesn’t apply now. although many don’t like wilson. so here’s hoping.
I think the Coalition will win even without the teal seats. We are going to see 5-10% swings against Labor in the suburban seats. There are almost 40 seats held by Labor with a margin under 10%.
Abbott was only 'deeply unpopular' with those that never would have voted for the Coalition anyway. If someone had said this time last year that Trump would win the election as well as the overall vote and both houses then you would have said they were crazy.
Expect a similar rout in Australia at the next election. And unlike the Democrats, Labor have been given due warning.
It will take something ot of the ordinary to achieve that.
But never say never. Abbott was deeply unpopular and didn’t have a great ministerial record either.
I say Abbott because he and Rudd were the only recent changes to get close to 5% overall
Rudd swung 23 seats, Abbott 18. Something in that range taken directly off Labor
Actually, they're quite different. The Teals serve the class interests of high income earners, whereas the Greens serve the class interests of low and middle income earners. These interests happen to intersect for things like climate change and political corruption that harm everybody, but don't necessarily intersect on things like taxation and the power of corporations.Media advertising and campaigning is done at the holisitic level - not at the seat level. Associating Teals and/or Greens (although they are both the same really) with Labor helps LNP in the outer suburban Labor seats which are the main seats in town this election.
Haha - The Greens pretend they are class warriors but the reality is they know that none of their proposals re tax would ever be enacted. Therefore their incomes will always be protected.Actually, they're quite different. The Teals serve the class interests of high income earners, whereas the Greens serve the class interests of low and middle income earners. These interests happen to intersect for things like climate change and political corruption that harm everybody, but don't necessarily intersect on things like taxation and the power of corporations.
You seem to be very adept at reading minds. You could make a very lucrative career out of that.Haha - The Greens pretend they are class warriors but the reality is they know that none of their proposals re tax would ever be enacted. Therefore their incomes will always be protected.
If anything, they are even more elitist than the Teals.
Along with mis and disinformation, campaign financing is, IMO, the main barrier to a healthier democracy. I would love it to be reformed. Just not in the way Labor is trying to do.![]()
Labor and the Coalition are poised to launch a major attack on our democracy
This new donations bill will starve small parties and independents of the cash they need to compete while fattening up the coffers of the big players.www.smh.com.au
Labor and the Coalition using every trick in the book to entrench electoral disadvantage to Teals and other independents.
Jenna Price says if you’re in a Labor or Coalition seat, write to your member immediately and tell them they’ve lost your vote if they collude to pass this seriously dishonest electoral funding reform bill.
Teals were backed by a billionaire funderJust got my first ‘anti teal’ flyer in the letter box in kooyong electorate.
It’s along the lines of teals will be catastrophic in a minority labor govt. a vote for teal is a vote for greens and labor. Funded by big money in Sydney and Melbourne. Teals mps voting with green and labor much more than with coalition
Tealsrevealed.com.
Presumably this is targeted at the small percentage of voters who switched lib to teal, cos all the arguments they put actually is positive for greens and labor voters who voted tactically either first or subsequent preferences that we are getting exactly what we voted for, and are pretty happy with it.
So the anti teal flyers are actually pro teal for about 40% of the voters letterboxed clap clap clap
Hope for their sake their arguments resonate with the moderate liberal voters who switched (a small percentage) or they are screwed
This after dutton basically sneering at them for 2 1/2 years
Short version: amateur hour
Do you take issue with billionaires backing people or parties?Teals were backed by a billionaire funder
They were simply to help the worst government we've ever had in Australia. get elected in 2022
Thank heavens some real common sense. Everyone should vote for one of the major parties, all we get with independents is groups of single purpose ideals, groups like the Greens who are right off the wall now,not Green anymore.Along with mis and disinformation, campaign financing is, IMO, the main barrier to a healthier democracy. I would love it to be reformed. Just not in the way Labor is trying to do.
We get the type like the maddening and definitely not doing anything for anyone who voted for it. Lidia Thorpe.
For starters lying. About energy. And pricesDo you take issue with billionaires backing people or parties?
Such as Rinehart, Stokes, Harvey, Packer, Palmer, Pratt, Murdoch etc.
Is Holmes a Court a billionaire?
What are the three most negatively impactful policies of this Government, in your opinion?