Its 1.7% but really its being propped up by the Greens vote. He will be fine.What was the margin in the Dutton's electorate last election?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its 1.7% but really its being propped up by the Greens vote. He will be fine.What was the margin in the Dutton's electorate last election?
You seriously think Tim Wilson will get back in?
What is about Wilson that is 'far-right'?sadly, it’s possible. the libs are pouring in big bucks, spreading misinformation, and targeting her at a personal level. wilson is a self-obsessed far-rightist who did sfa for his electorate cos he thought his blue-ribbon seat was his for life.
the issue daniel has is that a lot of libs voted for her cos they loathed morrison. that factor doesn’t apply now. although many don’t like wilson. so here’s hoping.
Its 1.7% but really its being propped up by the Greens vote. He will be fine.
If you don't think that Labor HQ will be desperately trying to distance themselves from the Greens and Teals during the election campaign, then all I can say is please volunteer to be a Labor adviser.
I will repeat - Being associated with the Greens and Teals is a certain vote LOSER for the swing voter.
He holds it with a 3.4% margin however the swing needed is 1.7%.Quite the ‘advice giver’ aren’t you? I suggest you study basics before getting onto ‘big stuff’
Dutton holds he seat with a 3% margin not 1.7%
Abbott was only 'deeply unpopular' with those that never would have voted for the Coalition anyway. If someone had said this time last year that Trump would win the election as well as the overall vote and both houses then you would have said they were crazy.
Expect a similar rout in Australia at the next election. And unlike the Democrats, Labor have been given due warning.
What is about Wilson that is 'far-right'?
He holds it with a 3.4% margin however the swing needed is 1.7%.
When party people talk about electoral seats they generally talk in the context of 'swing needed', not current margin.
sadly, it’s possible. the libs are pouring in big bucks, spreading misinformation, and targeting her at a personal level. wilson is a self-obsessed far-rightist who did sfa for his electorate cos he thought his blue-ribbon seat was his for life.
the issue daniel has is that a lot of libs voted for her cos they loathed morrison. that factor doesn’t apply now. although many don’t like wilson. so here’s hoping.
I think the Coalition will win even without the teal seats. We are going to see 5-10% swings against Labor in the suburban seats. There are almost 40 seats held by Labor with a margin under 10%.
Abbott was only 'deeply unpopular' with those that never would have voted for the Coalition anyway. If someone had said this time last year that Trump would win the election as well as the overall vote and both houses then you would have said they were crazy.
Expect a similar rout in Australia at the next election. And unlike the Democrats, Labor have been given due warning.
It will take something ot of the ordinary to achieve that.
But never say never. Abbott was deeply unpopular and didn’t have a great ministerial record either.
I say Abbott because he and Rudd were the only recent changes to get close to 5% overall
Rudd swung 23 seats, Abbott 18. Something in that range taken directly off Labor
Actually, they're quite different. The Teals serve the class interests of high income earners, whereas the Greens serve the class interests of low and middle income earners. These interests happen to intersect for things like climate change and political corruption that harm everybody, but don't necessarily intersect on things like taxation and the power of corporations.Media advertising and campaigning is done at the holisitic level - not at the seat level. Associating Teals and/or Greens (although they are both the same really) with Labor helps LNP in the outer suburban Labor seats which are the main seats in town this election.
Haha - The Greens pretend they are class warriors but the reality is they know that none of their proposals re tax would ever be enacted. Therefore their incomes will always be protected.Actually, they're quite different. The Teals serve the class interests of high income earners, whereas the Greens serve the class interests of low and middle income earners. These interests happen to intersect for things like climate change and political corruption that harm everybody, but don't necessarily intersect on things like taxation and the power of corporations.
You seem to be very adept at reading minds. You could make a very lucrative career out of that.Haha - The Greens pretend they are class warriors but the reality is they know that none of their proposals re tax would ever be enacted. Therefore their incomes will always be protected.
If anything, they are even more elitist than the Teals.