Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Given all our players are leaving because Yze is no good, then you could only think that Kingsley is worse than Yze given they're losing so many players having just finished top 4 this year.Perryman, Cumming, Peatling, Haynes, O'Halloran, Stone, Derksen all leavng the giants, quite a lot
Cause he hasn't sacked Yze or Livingstone yet.Why is J ORourke an idiot again?
Exactly, by taking that ground it also inadvertently puts more of a spotlight on Baker and Bolton's terrible speeches. But instead the whole focus is the Prez being a bit loose and the two guys who are actually leaving kind of get off scott-freeIf I was the RFC president I would have said to Dan Rioli, you are always a Richmond man and if you want to come back you are welcome as is Baker and Graham and all the others
Bit of a difference in terms of the calibre of players leaving, but yeah not ideal for the giants even if they are mostly depth or role playersGiven all our players are leaving because Yze is no good, then you could only think that Kingsley is worse than Yze given they're losing so many players having just finished top 4 this year.
We do need Lynch though.we do not need Lynch, and if he leaves he still is a Richmond man
If he goes to Lions and wins more premierships he is more of a Richmond man because RFC should be the club enabling premierships which is why players come here in the first place, apart from being drafted!!!
pay his salary to
If Lynch left it would bolster our forward line development.
Daly said he would be interested in Lynch amongst others.
If Brisbane got Lynch it allows them to have a crack while they develop others as well given his age
Exactly, by taking that ground it also inadvertently puts more of a spotlight on Baker and Bolton's terrible speeches. But instead the whole focus is the Prez being a bit loose and the two guys who are actually leaving kind of get off scott-free
we do not need a strong character, a big physical presence and a leader, we have othersWe do need Lynch though.
Lynch isn’t just a key forward.
He is a leader, a strong character, a big physical presence on the field, he understands the game and how key position forwards need to play. Say we draft a highly touted young KPF, you want them playing next to Lynch for the first year or 2 over someone like Samson, Lefau, Kozi who are all rookies in their own rights when it comes to being a tall forward.
What happens if that young forward has a patch at the start of his career and would benefit from a wise head protecting him on game day or providing development during the week at training. I can tell you Max King would be a far better player had Lynch been playing in the same team during his early years.
Riewoldt had Richo, Lynch had Riewoldt, who ever is next in line will get 1-2 years from the big man.
Brisbane do not deserve Lynch.
Ryan has buckleys of replacing Daniher especially up forward, laughableDid hear earlier in the year that Brisbane had some interest in Sampson Ryan.
Which kind of makes sense, considering their ruck/kpf stocks
As we’ve seen this year though he’s a long way off being a regular AFL player.
Re Lynch going, about the same chance as Cotch said Dusty was to GC.
It makes sense re: Noble trade but... why? Collingwood have Tom McGuane who's projected to be an early pick next year. Surely they need the points for him?Adelaide have done very well to get Cummings and Peatling. Very good depth.
I’ll say this about Pick 12 from GC.
They want to trade this into next years draft.
Collingwood have offered Noble and a F1 for Pick 12 and a late pick or pick swap. I think that deal is ideal for GC and the way they are thinking.
We should aim for Pick 6 and Pick 20. Pick 12 is not able to be obtained for us.
With Daniher going....Did hear earlier in the year that Brisbane had some interest in Sampson Ryan.
Which kind of makes sense, considering their ruck/kpf stocks
you do not follow RFC do you???It makes sense re: Noble trade but... why? Collingwood have Tom McGuane who's projected to be an early pick next year. Surely they need the points for him?
I would sign that deal incredibly fast if I was GC.
pies are cunning trying to tie Noble with 12 to create ambiguityAdelaide have done very well to get Cummings and Peatling. Very good depth.
I’ll say this about Pick 12 from GC.
They want to trade this into next years draft.
Collingwood have offered Noble and a F1 for Pick 12 and a late pick or pick swap. I think that deal is ideal for GC and the way they are thinking.
We should aim for Pick 6 and Pick 20. Pick 12 is not able to be obtained for us.
Points value sure but would’ve thought they could ask Pies to juice it given the reported competition for 12 this year. And if McGuane does end up Top 6 they wouldn’t want to hold their ‘25 first anywayIt makes sense re: Noble trade but... why? Collingwood have Tom McGuane who's projected to be an early pick next year. Surely they need the points for him?
I would sign that deal incredibly fast if I was GC.
who do the pies like at 12? travaglia or a KPP?Adelaide have done very well to get Cummings and Peatling. Very good depth.
I’ll say this about Pick 12 from GC.
They want to trade this into next years draft.
Collingwood have offered Noble and a F1 for Pick 12 and a late pick or pick swap. I think that deal is ideal for GC and the way they are thinking.
We should aim for Pick 6 and Pick 20. Pick 12 is not able to be obtained for us.
who do the pies like at 12? travaglia or a KPP?
Are you trolling?we do not need a strong character, a big physical presence and a leader, we have others
We have Lefu and others ready to develop more as well as who we pick up
our youngsters are getting smothered by a lack of opportunity
Points value sure but would’ve thought they could ask Pies to juice it given the reported competition for 12 this year. And if McGuane does end up Top 6 they wouldn’t want to hold their ‘25 first anyway
Pies have never played finals after trading a future 1stAdelaide have done very well to get Cummings and Peatling. Very good depth.
I’ll say this about Pick 12 from GC.
They want to trade this into next years draft.
Collingwood have offered Noble and a F1 for Pick 12 and a late pick or pick swap. I think that deal is ideal for GC and the way they are thinking.
We should aim for Pick 6 and Pick 20. Pick 12 is not able to be obtained for us.
no I am not rolling because newsflash, Lynch is in his thirties, we are not in a current window and I am all about winning premierships ahead and see 2025 as opportunity and developemnt for RFC and others thinking otherwise are counterproductive helping us finishing ninth and becoming FreoAre you trolling?
We have Lefau… fresh off an ACL rupture, his 2nd. Even if he had good knees, he is not the no.1 forward. The key Defenders are just too big/strong for him, he’s more of a big bodied medium tall that leads at the ball.
Our youngsters need senior players to help them develop. Make sure they are doing all the things outside of the footy club to be a professional athlete. Lynch is a standard setter in the gym and training. You take him away and then the standards drop, then the young kids start to slack off and their development gets hindered.
Having players like Lynch, Prestia, Broad, Vlastuin and Nank take the pressure off the young players and also the coach. There’s veterans for each line. Almost like an onfield coach for the young players.
Probably not a business to aspire to, given the past fortnight or so...So if Fremantle want to shop at Harrods, they are going to need to forget about looking for bargain prices.
I'd probably trade Lynch to Lions for a F1 if he wanted to go.
port are going to want more than just pick 12, how do they find another 1st?Dan Houston