Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I would take that in a beating heartHow about we offer them Hopper for McCrae
Pick 1, Pick 3, Pick 6, Pick 10 is probable at this stage. From snippet of info.
Freo very confident Bolton deal is being agreed in principle. Framework at least been done.
No way I'm paying 6 +9 for 2 on its own. Either add a fringe player we like or a 2nd rounder.6 & 20 Rioli (possibility of winkling 13 instead of 20 if we stump us a heap of cash)
9 & 10 Bolton (maybe a 2nd added if we pay enough salary)
14 Brisbane trade
Gives us 1-6-9-10-14-20-21-22
Baker + 10 for 3
6 + 9 for 2
Leaves 1-2-3-14-20-21-22 (Graham compo)
14-20 are 1st round picks, with the added bonus of the first 2 picks on the 2nd night.
HuhPies asked for pick 13 for Noble
Pies asked for pick 13 for Noble
isnt he the campaigner they got in the mid season draft and he couldnt get a gamePies asked for pick 13 for Noble
assuming we select midfielders with our first 3, what player would your choice for pick 10 be?Pick 1, Pick 3, Pick 6, Pick 10 is probable at this stage. From snippet of info.
Freo very confident Bolton deal is being agreed in principle. Framework at least been done.
I agree, stick with 1, 6, 9, plus the other picks in the teens, we have so many gaps in our list.Take Ashcroft and Lombard out of it. In no particular order: O’Sullivan, Smith, Langford, Smillie, Trainor, Reid, Lalor, Armstrong and Draper are the next nine players. If we have 1, 6 and 9, we are getting three of them.
For peanuts, hell bulldogs will probably offer their first along with McRae so Geelong pay his wage with their bottomless capProbably go to the Cats and play elite footy FFS
Just because a player is tied to a club already doesn't mean they don't exist. You're not getting the 10th best kid. You're getting the 13th best kid.That is incorrect - of the players available (excluding Father and sons etc) we have the tenth opportunity to draft a player - it may mean 12 or 13 selection but it represents the tenth available player
they may aswell be invisible, the only players that exist are the ones that are available, that should be the main focus not the number of the pick or if it drops down 1 or 2 spots for player that will never be oursJust because a player is tied to a club already doesn't mean they don't exist. You're not getting the 10th best kid. You're getting the 13th best kid.
Keep in mind too that Saints are going to get a compo pick, which pushes things out again.
Not sure on the maths there. If we have pick 1 and only 99% chance of getting the player we want at 2, Toce has to be using heroinAt pick 2 you are 99% getting the player you want. Those percentages drop every pick.
Hypothetically speaking, we take FOS at 1. At pick 6 and 9 we are guaranteed to get two of the eight players I mentioned. Therefore, there is little point trading up one of those picks for 3. We will have an earlier pick but we lose a regarded player from the eight that I mentioned. It’s not worth it.Don’t you mean you’d take 2 over the top of FOS?
Needs to be considered when you're trading picks.they may aswell be invisible, the only players that exist are the ones that are available, that should be the main focus not the number of the pick or if it drops down 1 or 2 spots for player that will never be ours
No I meant if we have pick 1 and North have pick 2, North are 99% likely to get the player they want. The further that pick slips the less likely it becomes.Not sure on the maths there. If we have pick 1 and only 99% chance of getting the player we want at 2, Toce has to be using heroin
What about when Essendon pick a guy at 9 that we rate at 30? What if we don't rate Kako as a first rounder?Needs to be considered when you're trading picks.
Gold Coast will come hard for Balta imoHe's right though. The system suggests we should let him go for pick 2 and then sign an equivalent FA next year and we've just plucked pick 2 out of our ass.
There should be incentive to match.
I reckon Pies. GrossGold Coast will come hard for Balta imo
Yeah true they need a youngish kpd too.I reckon Pies. Gross
Gold Coast will come hard for Balta imo
We'll have more money available than both.I reckon Pies. Gross
Of course but have to be sensible with it.We'll have more money available than both.
Not what I want, but how I see it playing out assuming we get our expected trades done and every other club holds their picks:Exactly. Norf need KPP not midfielders. So 2 is probably a reach for the best KPP, but 6 isn't. Then they get a bonus pick. They'd be all over a deal like that. Unless they think Melbourne will beat them to the punch.
Richmond - midfielder
Norf - KP
WC - Midfielder or KP (likely one from WA but they'll trade back)
Adelaide - Midfielder
Melbourne - KP