Sir_Loin
🏆🏆🏆
TBF I imagine that this offer has something to do with "demanding pick 20".
40 + Tarrant gets it done.
just reminding us who holds the power here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
TBF I imagine that this offer has something to do with "demanding pick 20".
40 + Tarrant gets it done.
Ok, wonder how we think we could retain him?he’s not a restricted free agent. He accepts our offer or goes to the PSD if we can’t get a trade done. There’s no matching.
Nah - its a common negotiation tactic - he who blinks first loses. So most deals are done at the very last moment - usually the club that blinks first are the ones that stand to benefit the most - or in this case have the most to loseAnd here we are, eating it up
Reading every article, listening to an afl in house radio station and every news article that comes out from multiple media outlets all essentially saying nothing we all didn’t already speculate or have been discussing for the past couple of weeks
Ok, wonder how we think we could retain him?
he accepts the contract offer we’ve made him. The club have no rights to retain him, CCJ and north hold all the cards
Not sure why we’re playing games with North. They hold all the power. Just take 38 + Tarrant and be done with it.
that’s a midfield that strikes fear into the opposition
You can't use that excuse with the offer they're giving him. "Yeh we're going to offer him a $2million contract but hey hes only played 9 games so hes really worth peanuts". ****ing scummy northNorth reasons the 22-year-old player has only played nine games since being drafted in 2017.
If we do that then they probably refuse to trade Tarrant, making us take him as a free agent and losing the Chol pick in the process.Disagree, don’t roll over to them, we don’t get what we want we walk him. Let’s see how that works for them in the future trades.
I get it now. So we potentially are thinking that if we offer what North have to CCJ then he probably picks us? That that's a worst case scenario, but better than losing him for nothing?
Sam Mitchell must figure it's so awful that he may as well go the nuclear option heading into next season and be done with as many of them as he can offload.
They nearly rolled our vfl kid midfieldthat’s a midfield that strikes fear into the opposition
imagine if he has put them in the market and they’re all still there next year haha
Hope he got front ended they might cease to exist in a cpl years lolfu** norf and ccj , they can keep their Melbourne bitter slab offer and let him walk
They nearly rolled out vfl kid midfield
Holy sh*t!
North's offer was a future 3rd and wanted a future 4th back?
Honestly, there's posturing, then there's flat out insulting another club.
You only make enemies and it's why clubs don't operate this way.
Don't get me wrong, CCJ is gone and we all know it - but I do find it strange that there was no official nomination by him or his management of a trade.
As I said, it's probably nothing but seems to be an anomoly? Don't recall this in the past? Maybe just speaks volumes of discontent behind close doors of what in play here - considering how RFC took the COVID hit for him.
This won't end well.