Trade Hypotheticals *MERGED THREADS*

Remove this Banner Ad

Re: Mitch Thorp?

I would doubt he will be traded unless a club wishes to put an offer to the Hawks that they could not refuse.

He is contracted for 1 more year and next year its time for him to perform and show improvement.

In regards to his attitude problem, he is still young and immature but a very confident young man. Has the passion to make it in the AFL but his body is letting him down. Mitch need to learn and focus in his preparation and the talent will speak for themselves.

As for his injury, I would assume the Hawks will be patient with it similiar to Dowler.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: Mitch Thorp?

I would doubt he will be traded unless a club wishes to put an offer to the Hawks that they could not refuse.

He is contracted for 1 more year and next year its time for him to perform and show improvement.

In regards to his attitude problem, he is still young and immature but a very confident young man. Has the passion to make it in the AFL but his body is letting him down. Mitch need to learn and focus in his preparation and the talent will speak for themselves.

As for his injury, I would assume the Hawks will be patient with it similiar to Dowler.

One of the problems Hawthorn face is to find some key defenders and to do that they will need to make some decisions and Thorp may be one of the options that they will look at trading as right now this may be the difference between being a real flag threat in 2010, as the Hawks look quite thin down back.
 
Re: Mitch Thorp?

The problem with someone like Thorp is the problem that any club faces with a talented young draftee.

After investing so much time and effort into a player (particularly a Top 10 pick), clubs are always reluctant to trade them away for a lower pick - given the off chance that they could end up a star.

With that in mind, clubs will always look to keep the player for as long as he possibly can, in the hope that he eventually shows something.

Thorp is an enormous talent, he just needs to get his body right. Who knows whether that will happen, but hopefully it will be with us.

And then other clubs don't want to pay full freight because of injury problems. At the end of the day, it's unlikely that a trade will get done in these circumstances - the Hawks (rightly) think he's worth a bit because of what he could become) and other clubs (rightly) don't think he's worth as much because of the risk.
 
Re: Mitch Thorp?

One of the problems Hawthorn face is to find some key defenders and to do that they will need to make some decisions and Thorp may be one of the options that they will look at trading as right now this may be the difference between being a real flag threat in 2010, as the Hawks look quite thin down back.

IMO, defenders are not a pressing need.

Croad may or may not return. Lisle, Schoenmaker, Gilham are options. However Lisle and Schoey need a few years in the system to be established. Dowler could be option but is better placed forward. Thorp is an unknown due to his injury and the trump card is Roughead could be used.

Rucks is the major problem. This is were Sam Jacobs, Hampson or Warnock are of interest. I doubt the Hawks are willing to trade a forward like Dowler or Thorp for these players unless 1st rounder is offered. That is just my opinion.
 
Re: Mitch Thorp?

Why are you talking about Essendon?

Team fail. :rolleyes:

Fair point. Been a while since a team has ****ed up as bigtime as your lot following a flag. Humiliating to be pulling out the various excuses all season.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Gibson to leave Norf

and Waverly bound apparently.

The Hawks are gonna be bidding aggressively, (~800k over 3yrs). So you think the Carlton Board should have a shot at out bidding, and if so what would you give?

Personally, I think they should have a crack at him, maybe even offer up first round draft pick.

He'd plug a lot of gaps in our defense.
 
Re: Gibson to leave Norf

Gibson is very overrated and I think over the last few years he has had the most goals kicked on him out of all the full backs.

Much rather have a crack at lake or goose maguire to be honest.

You put waite and jamo back in our team and our back 6 look a whole lot better.
 
Re: Gibson to leave Norf

Is more an athletic defender that punches above his weight class than a genuine key position player IMO. Much like Thornton and Bower. I think he is pretty good but not what we need especially when it comes to a bidding war.
 
Re: Gibson to leave Norf

Good player but not the sort of defender that we need. As ODN said, he'd be competing with Thornton and Bower and the difference between GIbson and those 2 is not a difference worth trading or trying to out-bid another club.

If he somehow found his way to the club then of course I'd welcome him but to trade for him and enter a bidding war for his services would be a ridiculous decision by the club.
 
Re: Gibson to leave Norf

Lake would be awesome, but Dogs are clamping hard on him. My argument for a first round would be that having him in the backline would give Waite more time up front and playing CHF.

Its more of a band-aid solution as developing Kreuzer into that would take a couple of seasons. Think it would be good for a flag tilt.

But Hawks seem a certainty at this stage.
 
Re: Gibson to leave Norf

YES!!! Let's get another defender!!! :D :D :D

Then we can play Jamison, Bower, Austin, Thornton, Waite and Gibson in the backline together!! Good luck beating the height of that backline I tells ya!!

Fingers crossed the ball doesn't hit the ground though
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Trade Hypotheticals *MERGED THREADS*

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top